Talk:Covenant army: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
(New page: On the introduced during great schism, the weapons were around before. Brute Shots, Spikers and Gravity Hammers have been mentioned before in books, a brute shot killing a spartan, Tartaru…) |
No edit summary |
||
| (17 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
On the introduced during great schism, the weapons were around before. Brute Shots, Spikers and Gravity Hammers have been mentioned before in books, a brute shot killing a spartan, Tartarus wielding a spiker, and well, HW and HR confirm the gravity hammer, and Maccebus's Fist of Rukt in CH). So should we fix it?[[Special:Contributions/69.144.238.157|69.144.238.157]] 22:09, August 3, 2010 (UTC) | On the introduced during great schism, the weapons were around before. Brute Shots, Spikers and Gravity Hammers have been mentioned before in books, a brute shot killing a spartan, Tartarus wielding a spiker, and well, HW and HR confirm the gravity hammer, and Maccebus's Fist of Rukt in CH). So should we fix it?[[Special:Contributions/69.144.238.157|69.144.238.157]] 22:09, August 3, 2010 (UTC) | ||
== War against humanity == | |||
Yo, Subtank I dont want an edit war so I'd just thought Id argue it over here... Errr may I ask why the thing i wrote on war against humanity got removed, its just that I thought it might give some insight on how the covenant army do against the humans an all that and I didnt make it biased in favour of the covenant I tried to do it from a neutral POV. So yeah, please reply when your ready. | |||
:Amended.— <span style="font-size:120%; font-family:Palatino Linotype; font-style:italic;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 14:17, 8 April 2011 (EDT) | |||
Ok, thanks and goodly worded too... --[[User talk:CookieMonstersayshello|CookieMonstersayshello]] 14:32, 8 April 2011 (EDT) | |||
:Note, just click that signature button once. You don't need to write your username after that. :P — <span style="font-size:120%; font-family:Palatino Linotype; font-style:italic;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 14:37, 8 April 2011 (EDT) | |||
K--[[User talk:CookieMonstersayshello|CookieMonstersayshello]] 15:42, 8 April 2011 (EDT) | |||
Why cant we just revert it to this: | |||
"The Covenant army play an important role in Covenant campaigns against humans and consist mostly of Unggoy and Kig-Yar (with a few Sangheili or Jiralhanae commanding them) and whilst they are considerably weaker than the humans, the other species though less in number, generally fare much better than the UNSC in combat situations. However, the presence of a Spartan or a special tactical manouver on the UNSC's part could easily swing the tide of the battle in their favour... " | |||
--[[User talk:CookieMonstersayshello|CookieMonstersayshello]] 09:55, 5 August 2011 (EDT) | |||
:The very reason why I revert your edits is simply because those additions do not focus at all to the history, but more towards the "behaviour" of the branch. That edit should be more on the Covenant Empire article on military campaign (i.e. [[Covenant_Empire#Military]].— <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 10:36, 5 August 2011 (EDT) | |||
Kk, sorry about that Subtank. --[[User talk:CookieMonstersayshello|CookieMonstersayshello]] 07:54, 6 August 2011 (EDT) | |||
== A merge proposal made on September 2013 == | |||
Just wondering what's the rationale behind the proposal. — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 21:13, 23 February 2014 (EST) | |||
:See Forum:Covenant military restructuring|this and parts of [[Talk:UNSC Defense Force#Do away with the UNSC ranking?|this discussion]]. It's basically to get rid of the branch-based Covenant military pages since there's scarcely any proof that the Covenant ever structured their forces the way humans do. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 22:59, 23 February 2014 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:28, August 2, 2017
On the introduced during great schism, the weapons were around before. Brute Shots, Spikers and Gravity Hammers have been mentioned before in books, a brute shot killing a spartan, Tartarus wielding a spiker, and well, HW and HR confirm the gravity hammer, and Maccebus's Fist of Rukt in CH). So should we fix it?69.144.238.157 22:09, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
War against humanity[edit]
Yo, Subtank I dont want an edit war so I'd just thought Id argue it over here... Errr may I ask why the thing i wrote on war against humanity got removed, its just that I thought it might give some insight on how the covenant army do against the humans an all that and I didnt make it biased in favour of the covenant I tried to do it from a neutral POV. So yeah, please reply when your ready.
- Amended.— subtank 14:17, 8 April 2011 (EDT)
Ok, thanks and goodly worded too... --CookieMonstersayshello 14:32, 8 April 2011 (EDT)
- Note, just click that signature button once. You don't need to write your username after that. :P — subtank 14:37, 8 April 2011 (EDT)
K--CookieMonstersayshello 15:42, 8 April 2011 (EDT)
Why cant we just revert it to this:
"The Covenant army play an important role in Covenant campaigns against humans and consist mostly of Unggoy and Kig-Yar (with a few Sangheili or Jiralhanae commanding them) and whilst they are considerably weaker than the humans, the other species though less in number, generally fare much better than the UNSC in combat situations. However, the presence of a Spartan or a special tactical manouver on the UNSC's part could easily swing the tide of the battle in their favour... "
--CookieMonstersayshello 09:55, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
- The very reason why I revert your edits is simply because those additions do not focus at all to the history, but more towards the "behaviour" of the branch. That edit should be more on the Covenant Empire article on military campaign (i.e. Covenant_Empire#Military.— subtank 10:36, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
Kk, sorry about that Subtank. --CookieMonstersayshello 07:54, 6 August 2011 (EDT)
A merge proposal made on September 2013[edit]
Just wondering what's the rationale behind the proposal. — subtank 21:13, 23 February 2014 (EST)
- See Forum:Covenant military restructuring|this and parts of this discussion. It's basically to get rid of the branch-based Covenant military pages since there's scarcely any proof that the Covenant ever structured their forces the way humans do. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 22:59, 23 February 2014 (EST)