35,266
edits
Talk:Covenant religion: Difference between revisions
→Objective?
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I know these discussions were years ago, but reading this I think that it's not objective enough: there are sections that read less like an encyclopedia and more like a dramatic retelling. It's cool, granted, but I feel like it doesn't meet the standards for the wiki's style of writing. Stuff like "Then, the unthinkable happened"; referring to the Halos as "sacred rings" outside quotation marks; saying "The Flood, or 'The Parasite' as referred to by members of the Covenant, are an unholy, virulent species" etc. Should this be changed or is there a purpose to it? -- [[User:126 Joyous Testimony|126 Joyous Testimony]] 22:09, 28 March 2017 (UTC) | I know these discussions were years ago, but reading this I think that it's not objective enough: there are sections that read less like an encyclopedia and more like a dramatic retelling. It's cool, granted, but I feel like it doesn't meet the standards for the wiki's style of writing. Stuff like "Then, the unthinkable happened"; referring to the Halos as "sacred rings" outside quotation marks; saying "The Flood, or 'The Parasite' as referred to by members of the Covenant, are an unholy, virulent species" etc. Should this be changed or is there a purpose to it? -- [[User:126 Joyous Testimony|126 Joyous Testimony]] 22:09, 28 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
:You're absolutely right, those parts should be altered to be more neutral. Even if this is a Covenant-focused article it shouldn't read like it's written from Covenant POV. --[[User:Jugus|Jugus]] ([[User talk:Jugus|talk]]) 00:40, 29 March 2017 (EDT) | |||
== Forerunner great journey; truth in terminals? == | == Forerunner great journey; truth in terminals? == | ||