User talk:CIA391: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:20, February 7, 2017

Multiple Edits

Please avoid making multiple edits to an article. If you are not sure how your edit will look, use the preview feature. Thanks.--Spartacus ^{Talk • Contribs} 15:48, 1 March 2015 (EST)

I'll keep that in mind. I hardly use this place often so I apologise. I am more used to it now thoughCIA391 00:38, 2 March 2015 (GMT)

Dude

Do you have a problem? --90.193.149.135 07:31, 27 January 2017 (EST)

Explain.

Um I am just doing my job here. But to describe my reverts in reference with that current IP address of yours.

A) You added stuff into pages that didnt make sense in the sentence it was in.(like that aint bad, we all have off days on that)

B) You added sentences that without a source or image to prove that its fact.(I have never seen a source call Pure forms "Hitler forms", plus that specific example is kinda unacceptable without a source to back it up) -CIA391 (talk) 08:18, 27 January 2017 (EST)

Covenant performance against the Flood

Would Halopedia think less of an edit that pointed out that if the Human-Covenant war played differently and Hunters were more involved, the Covenant would have a better chance of containing the flood as the Hunters are the most successful warriors when combating the parasite? --Jarr (talk) 18:10, 7 February 2017 (EST)

Well seeing as that sadly goes into fanon(fan fiction) and not actual events, or media released by Bungie/343i/Microsoft, it would be best to leave it out. If you understand that logic.-CIA391 (talk) 18:12, 7 February 2017 (EST)

Very vaguely understand but I'm not sure if it counts as fanon when looking at the modded action between Flood Tank Forms and Hunters and having the Hunters school them every time - or is that a conversation for Halo Nation? I just thought it could be useful given the two warriors are foils for each other physically and functionally --Jarr (talk) 18:18, 7 February 2017 (EST)

That battle wasn't rigged by the guy who made the video but it's a statistically fair test that proves the Hunters' worth as warriors - could be worth saying in the gameplay section (it's proven on this video etc.) if not in the story could be seen on the same level as that easter egg Grunt on the final Halo3 mission Halo. --Jarr (talk) 18: 20, 7 February 2017 (EST)

Revision as of 18:18, February 7, 2017 (edit) Jarr (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Covenant performance against the Flood) ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:20, February 7, 2017 (edit) (undo) Jarr (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Covenant performance against the Flood) Newer edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Very vaguely understand but I'm not sure if it counts as fanon when looking at the modded action between Flood Tank Forms and Hunters and having the Hunters school them every time - or is that a conversation for Halo Nation? I just thought it could be useful given the two warriors are foils for each other physically and functionally --[[User:Jarr\|Jarr]] ([[User talk:Jarr\|talk]]) 18:18, 7 February 2017 (EST)		Very vaguely understand but I'm not sure if it counts as fanon when looking at the modded action between Flood Tank Forms and Hunters and having the Hunters school them every time - or is that a conversation for Halo Nation? I just thought it could be useful given the two warriors are foils for each other physically and functionally --[[User:Jarr\|Jarr]] ([[User talk:Jarr\|talk]]) 18:18, 7 February 2017 (EST)

			; That battle wasn't rigged by the guy who made the video but it's a statistically fair test that proves the Hunters' worth as warriors - could be worth saying in the gameplay section (it's proven on this video etc.) if not in the story could be seen on the same level as that easter egg Grunt on the final Halo3 mission Halo. --[[User:Jarr\|Jarr]] ([[User talk:Jarr\|talk]]) 18:20, 7 February 2017 (EST)