User talk:CIA391: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:12, February 7, 2017

Multiple Edits

Please avoid making multiple edits to an article. If you are not sure how your edit will look, use the preview feature. Thanks.--Spartacus ^{Talk • Contribs} 15:48, 1 March 2015 (EST)

I'll keep that in mind. I hardly use this place often so I apologise. I am more used to it now thoughCIA391 00:38, 2 March 2015 (GMT)

Dude

Do you have a problem? --90.193.149.135 07:31, 27 January 2017 (EST)

Explain.

Um I am just doing my job here. But to describe my reverts in reference with that current IP address of yours.

A) You added stuff into pages that didnt make sense in the sentence it was in.(like that aint bad, we all have off days on that)

B) You added sentences that without a source or image to prove that its fact.(I have never seen a source call Pure forms "Hitler forms", plus that specific example is kinda unacceptable without a source to back it up) -CIA391 (talk) 08:18, 27 January 2017 (EST)

Covenant performance against the Flood

Would Halopedia think less of an edit that pointed out that if the Human-Covenant war played differently and Hunters were more involved, the Covenant would have a better chance of containing the flood as the Hunters are the most successful warriors when combating the parasite? --Jarr (talk) 18:10, 7 February 2017 (EST)

Well seeing as that sadly goes into fanon(fan fiction) and not actual events, or media released by Bungie/343i/Microsoft, it would be best to leave it out. If you understand that logic.-CIA391 (talk) 18:12, 7 February 2017 (EST)

Revision as of 18:10, February 7, 2017 (edit) Jarr (talk \| contribs) (→‎Covenant performance against the Flood: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:12, February 7, 2017 (edit) (undo) CIA391 (talk \| contribs) (→‎Covenant performance against the Flood) Newer edit →
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Would Halopedia think less of an edit that pointed out that if the Human-Covenant war played differently and Hunters were more involved, the Covenant would have a better chance of containing the flood as the Hunters are the most successful warriors when combating the parasite? --[[User:Jarr\|Jarr]] ([[User talk:Jarr\|talk]]) 18:10, 7 February 2017 (EST)		Would Halopedia think less of an edit that pointed out that if the Human-Covenant war played differently and Hunters were more involved, the Covenant would have a better chance of containing the flood as the Hunters are the most successful warriors when combating the parasite? --[[User:Jarr\|Jarr]] ([[User talk:Jarr\|talk]]) 18:10, 7 February 2017 (EST)

			:Well seeing as that sadly goes into fanon(fan fiction) and not actual events, or media released by Bungie/343i/Microsoft, it would be best to leave it out. If you understand that logic.-[[User:CIA391\|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391\|talk]]) 18:12, 7 February 2017 (EST)