7,301
edits
Talk:Blooding Years: Difference between revisions
→Can we have a citation for the Blooding Years being ongoing?
Covenant PhD (talk | contribs) |
Covenant PhD (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
:Mdama is dead, Mdama's faction is entirely destroyed, Telcam is dead, Arbiter and his faction are doing well. That is plenty of evidence to suggest that the war could very well be over. | :Mdama is dead, Mdama's faction is entirely destroyed, Telcam is dead, Arbiter and his faction are doing well. That is plenty of evidence to suggest that the war could very well be over. | ||
:I have presented evidence suggesting, what evidence do you have to say that it's ongoing? The burden of proof is placed upon the claim with less/no evidence. If you have no evidence, my argument overpowers yours.[[User:Editorguy|Editorguy]] ([[User talk:Editorguy|talk]]) 20:33, 22 November 2016 (EST) | :I have presented evidence suggesting, what evidence do you have to say that it's ongoing? The burden of proof is placed upon the claim with less/no evidence. If you have no evidence, my argument overpowers yours. | ||
:It's also important to keep in mind, I'm not even editing to REMOVE that the war is ongoing, simply asking for citations to be placed where it says ongoing. It's expected that it should be cited, the fact that a citation can't even be found for it raises a red flag. That's where you should be looking to prove me wrong, with a citation, not with "because it is". [[User:Editorguy|Editorguy]] ([[User talk:Editorguy|talk]]) 20:33, 22 November 2016 (EST) | |||
=== Sub-section: Regarding the recent knowledge that Jul 'Mdama and Avu Med 'Telcam have been killed === | === Sub-section: Regarding the recent knowledge that Jul 'Mdama and Avu Med 'Telcam have been killed === | ||