15,413
edits
Template talk:Timeline: Difference between revisions
→Revert to previous design
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
:Agreed. I'm particularly uncomfortable about the use of our informal era system in such a prominent place, and with the "Previous" and "Next" arrows, the template should be easy enough to navigate now even without the subsections. --[[User:Jugus|Jugus]] ([[User talk:Jugus|talk]]) 13:46, 13 September 2016 (EDT) | :Agreed. I'm particularly uncomfortable about the use of our informal era system in such a prominent place, and with the "Previous" and "Next" arrows, the template should be easy enough to navigate now even without the subsections. --[[User:Jugus|Jugus]] ([[User talk:Jugus|talk]]) 13:46, 13 September 2016 (EDT) | ||
::I agree with the point about Era names and intend to change those, I was more or less using them as a placeholder (best idea there would be to divide the list into BCE and CE). However, I think the list should at least be divided up in some way into common years, as well as separating the years with real-world only events (there's only ''two'' duplicates, 1999 and 2004). Previous and next only works if the reader wishes to go directly to the next or previous year. However, if the reader intends to go from 2552 to 852 BCE or vice-versa, that's quite a lot of scrolling (which is a pain since the scrollbar always defaults to the top), which will only get longer with the addition of more years.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 14:02, 13 September 2016 (EDT) | |||