Forum:An important question about consistency formatting: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
Covenant PhD (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Covenant PhD (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
:I personally prefer the first format. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 08:45, 26 August 2016 (EDT) | :I personally prefer the first format. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 08:45, 26 August 2016 (EDT) | ||
::Sorry, I didn't clarify that well xD. It's two separate questions. Point form for each belligerent or no point form for each belligerent (*UNSC or UNSC)? Short form for each belligerent or full name for each belligerent(UNSC or United Nations Space Command)? | ::Sorry, I didn't clarify that well xD. It's two separate questions. Point form for each belligerent or no point form for each belligerent (*UNSC or UNSC)? Short form for each belligerent or full name for each belligerent(UNSC or United Nations Space Command)? | ||
::If by first form you mean the first example I provided, I like that one too since it's more clear.[[User:Editorguy|Editorguy]] ([[User talk:Editorguy|talk]]) 08:52, 26 August 2016 (EDT) |
Revision as of 07:52, August 26, 2016
Forums: Index → Community Proposal → An important question about consistency formatting |
I see a lot of inconsistent formatting on the wiki. I'm curious as to wich format we are sticking too with these two questions.
1. In battles, when we list the belligerents. Should we use point form for each faction? or should we not use point form. See the first two examples on the right.
An important question about consistency formatting | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
An important question about consistency formatting | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
2. In battles, when we list the belligerents. Should we show the short form of a faction, or the full name. I see UNSC being used sometimes, and United Nations Space Command being used in other times. Which one should we use? See the third example.
Whichever one we use, I'll be happy to take the time to go though each article and keep the format consistent. Which formats are we choosing?
An important question about consistency formatting | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
- I personally prefer the first format. --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 08:45, 26 August 2016 (EDT)
- Sorry, I didn't clarify that well xD. It's two separate questions. Point form for each belligerent or no point form for each belligerent (*UNSC or UNSC)? Short form for each belligerent or full name for each belligerent(UNSC or United Nations Space Command)?
- If by first form you mean the first example I provided, I like that one too since it's more clear.Editorguy (talk) 08:52, 26 August 2016 (EDT)