Talk:AIR ASSAULT-class Mjolnir: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
Sith Venator (talk | contribs) m (Sith Venator moved page Talk:MJOLNIR Powered Assault Armor/AA variant to Talk:AIR ASSAULT-class Mjolnir) |
(Big problem with Infobox) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Another Notable Similarity == | == Another Notable Similarity == | ||
This update is to help structure this article's recent Trivia highlights edit. The new Air Assault is also similar to Gray Team's "special" Mark IV MJOLNIR armor. You could essentially replace Mark V [GEN2] chest with AA, and the Stalker visor. --[[User:SpartanS36|SpartanS36]] ([[User talk:SpartanS36|talk]]) 03:05, 26 July 2013 (EDT) | This update is to help structure this article's recent Trivia highlights edit. The new Air Assault is also similar to Gray Team's "special" Mark IV MJOLNIR armor. You could essentially replace Mark V [GEN2] chest with AA, and the Stalker visor. --[[User:SpartanS36|SpartanS36]] ([[User talk:SpartanS36|talk]]) 03:05, 26 July 2013 (EDT) | ||
==Problem with Infobox== | |||
Technical specifications doesnt appear in any of the articles? Is that a design choice or a bug? --[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 19:36, 5 March 2013 (GMT) |
Revision as of 14:37, March 5, 2016
Gen 2
The Gen 2 Air Assault chest is modelled after the Mk.V prototype (Reach) default chest, and the shoulders are modelled after the FJ/Para shoulders. Since the Recruit (default) wrists and legs are modelled after the Reach default, if you equip full Air Assault you're wearing Kat's armour! Alex T Snow 22:36, 11 November 2012 (EST)
Another Notable Similarity
This update is to help structure this article's recent Trivia highlights edit. The new Air Assault is also similar to Gray Team's "special" Mark IV MJOLNIR armor. You could essentially replace Mark V [GEN2] chest with AA, and the Stalker visor. --SpartanS36 (talk) 03:05, 26 July 2013 (EDT)
Problem with Infobox
Technical specifications doesnt appear in any of the articles? Is that a design choice or a bug? --CIA391 (talk) 19:36, 5 March 2013 (GMT)