891
edits
Talk:Halberd-class light destroyer: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
NightHammer (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::No, that should be good enough. The reference is to page 19 which in my version is just a mostly blank page with PART 1 written on it. I checked the next page with text, page 21, but there's no description of the destroyer. If you could reference the portion that refers to the arrow shape of the hull, that will be sufficient to cement this as a Halberd-class I think. -[[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 16:02, 21 February 2015 (EST) | ::No, that should be good enough. The reference is to page 19 which in my version is just a mostly blank page with PART 1 written on it. I checked the next page with text, page 21, but there's no description of the destroyer. If you could reference the portion that refers to the arrow shape of the hull, that will be sufficient to cement this as a Halberd-class I think. -[[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 16:02, 21 February 2015 (EST) | ||
:::Page 26 (I referenced the page in the article itself in the "Superstructure and hull" section). I just used page 19 as a generic reference for the ship itself, although that could be changed. - [[User:NightHammer|NightHammer]] ([[User talk:NightHammer|talk]]) 16:10, 21 February 2015 (EST) | :::Page 26 (I referenced the page in the article itself in the "Superstructure and hull" section). I just used page 19 as a generic reference for the ship itself, although that could be changed. - [[User:NightHammer|NightHammer]] ([[User talk:NightHammer|talk]]) 16:10, 21 February 2015 (EST) | ||
::::The reference to page 26 would do it. Nice find! -[[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 16:12, 21 February 2015 (EST) | |||