Talk:MJOLNIR (B): Difference between revisions

Talk:MJOLNIR (B) (edit)

Revision as of 19:06, November 10, 2014

376 bytes added , 10 years ago

→‎Title

Imrane-117

6,257

edits

Revision as of 18:32, November 10, 2014 (edit) Imrane-117 (talk \| contribs) (→‎Title) ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:06, November 10, 2014 (edit) (undo) Imrane-117 (talk \| contribs) (→‎Title) Newer edit →
Line 146:		Line 146:

	Now we have to make a choice, because there is really such a thing as a MJOLNIR [B] armor according to Halo Waypoint (Fred's page), both for the Mark IV and Mark V. As stated earlier by Braidenvl, the term "Mark IV" didn't exist, but I think it's somehow irrelevant because names have often been applied retroactively. I suggest moving the page to "MJOLNIR Powered Assault Armor/(B) variant", simply. Like we do for other armors. And this time, we can't really accuse 343i of canonizing Halopedia's speculation, because we did refrain from doing anything risky. I have to say I'm glad that they made this choice, in my head it had always been like this, although due to the above conversation I never really tried to force this into the wiki, for obvious reasons. [[User:Imrane-117\|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117\|talk]]) 17:32, 10 November 2014 (EST)		Now we have to make a choice, because there is really such a thing as a MJOLNIR [B] armor according to Halo Waypoint (Fred's page), both for the Mark IV and Mark V. As stated earlier by Braidenvl, the term "Mark IV" didn't exist, but I think it's somehow irrelevant because names have often been applied retroactively. I suggest moving the page to "MJOLNIR Powered Assault Armor/(B) variant", simply. Like we do for other armors. And this time, we can't really accuse 343i of canonizing Halopedia's speculation, because we did refrain from doing anything risky. I have to say I'm glad that they made this choice, in my head it had always been like this, although due to the above conversation I never really tried to force this into the wiki, for obvious reasons. [[User:Imrane-117\|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117\|talk]]) 17:32, 10 November 2014 (EST)

			:I wonder if they should really get separate pages. As I suggested, we usually put Mark IV, V and VI variants on the same page, for example "[[MJOLNIR Powered Assault Armor/V variant\|V variant]]". In this case, wouldn't "(B) variant" be able to group both Mark IV(B) and Mark V(B)? [[User:Imrane-117\|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117\|talk]]) 18:06, 10 November 2014 (EST)