Talk:History of the United Nations Space Command: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
(Created page with "==Merge to UNSC== The content of this article would be better off in United Nations Space Command's history section, with some of the more in-depth bits being distributed ...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Merge to UNSC== | ==Merge to UNSC== | ||
The content of this article would be better off in [[United Nations Space Command]]'s history section, with some of the more in-depth bits being distributed to the [[human colonies]] and [[Insurrection]] pages. This page is already woefully out of date in terms of new info and it would be much easier to update it if it were located in a single article as opposed to two separate ones. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 23:48, 18 February 2014 (EST) | The content of this article would be better off in [[United Nations Space Command]]'s history section, with some of the more in-depth bits being distributed to the [[human colonies]] and [[Insurrection]] pages. This page is already woefully out of date in terms of new info and it would be much easier to update it if it were located in a single article as opposed to two separate ones. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 23:48, 18 February 2014 (EST) | ||
:Makes sense to me, especially when the article is way out of date.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 01:54, 19 February 2014 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 01:54, February 19, 2014
Merge to UNSC
The content of this article would be better off in United Nations Space Command's history section, with some of the more in-depth bits being distributed to the human colonies and Insurrection pages. This page is already woefully out of date in terms of new info and it would be much easier to update it if it were located in a single article as opposed to two separate ones. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 23:48, 18 February 2014 (EST)