File talk:HCE-AlphaHalo-RingDetail.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

(→‎Lighting: new section)
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


Regarding the recent reversion of the lighting/color correction: I am well aware that the image appears the way it does in ''The Art of Halo''. However, I also believe it's rather counterproductive to recreate obvious printing imperfections as opposed to replicating the actual coloration from the [[Halo: Combat Evolved|original source]]. Now, for some bizarre reason, this exact image does not appear to exist online in high resolution (if it did, I would've uploaded that instead) - [http://b3.img.v4.skyrock.net/3555/70053555/pics/3097717803_2_3_QthoUAZO.jpg 899 x 506] is the biggest version that Google image search can provide. But even a cursory look at [https://www.google.com/search?hl=fi&q=installation+04&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSYgmKIGsUfMfnUhpOCxCwjKcIGjwKOggBEhTBB6EEqgewBJQHnQSkBJcE9gaNBxogZvcTNKtBici4GriDv2Wjg-Y2p4xHiVCNhTV4er-5iAcMCxCOrv4IGgAMIYdERDJ9BBDW&sa=X&ei=hyjEUZGFOuXJ4ATQ_oHoCA&ved=0CCUQ2A4oAQ&biw=1920&bih=922 the results] (or for that matter, the ''Halo: Combat Evolved'' main menu) makes it obvious that the coloring is supposed to be much darker. It's not a huge issue, but since we have this as the main image, the washed out coloration is a little distracting. ---[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 06:41, 21 June 2013 (EDT)
Regarding the recent reversion of the lighting/color correction: I am well aware that the image appears the way it does in ''The Art of Halo''. However, I also believe it's rather counterproductive to recreate obvious printing imperfections as opposed to replicating the actual coloration from the [[Halo: Combat Evolved|original source]]. Now, for some bizarre reason, this exact image does not appear to exist online in high resolution (if it did, I would've uploaded that instead) - [http://b3.img.v4.skyrock.net/3555/70053555/pics/3097717803_2_3_QthoUAZO.jpg 899 x 506] is the biggest version that Google image search can provide. But even a cursory look at [https://www.google.com/search?hl=fi&q=installation+04&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSYgmKIGsUfMfnUhpOCxCwjKcIGjwKOggBEhTBB6EEqgewBJQHnQSkBJcE9gaNBxogZvcTNKtBici4GriDv2Wjg-Y2p4xHiVCNhTV4er-5iAcMCxCOrv4IGgAMIYdERDJ9BBDW&sa=X&ei=hyjEUZGFOuXJ4ATQ_oHoCA&ved=0CCUQ2A4oAQ&biw=1920&bih=922 the results] (or for that matter, the ''Halo: Combat Evolved'' main menu) makes it obvious that the coloring is supposed to be much darker. It's not a huge issue, but since we have this as the main image, the washed out coloration is a little distracting. ---[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 06:41, 21 June 2013 (EDT)
:Very well. I will upload a new one with the darker lighting, along with most of the white blemishes removed. --'''''[[User:Xamikaze330|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Halo;">Xamikaze330</span>]]''''' <small>['''''[[User talk:Xamikaze330|<font color="Blue">Transmit</font>]]'''''|'''''[[Special:Contributions/Xamikaze330|<font color="Green">Files</font>]]''''']</small> 11:35, 21 June 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330

Revision as of 10:35, June 21, 2013

Lighting

Regarding the recent reversion of the lighting/color correction: I am well aware that the image appears the way it does in The Art of Halo. However, I also believe it's rather counterproductive to recreate obvious printing imperfections as opposed to replicating the actual coloration from the original source. Now, for some bizarre reason, this exact image does not appear to exist online in high resolution (if it did, I would've uploaded that instead) - 899 x 506 is the biggest version that Google image search can provide. But even a cursory look at the results (or for that matter, the Halo: Combat Evolved main menu) makes it obvious that the coloring is supposed to be much darker. It's not a huge issue, but since we have this as the main image, the washed out coloration is a little distracting. ---Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 06:41, 21 June 2013 (EDT)

Very well. I will upload a new one with the darker lighting, along with most of the white blemishes removed. --Xamikaze330 [Transmit|Files] 11:35, 21 June 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330