Data Drop/POA1: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{| style="border: 1px dashed #999999; background:#F2F3F4; padding:7px; font-family: monospace;" align="center" width="600px"
{| style="border: 1px dashed #999999; background:#F2F3F4; padding:7px; font-family: monospace; font-size:13px;" align="center" width="600px"
|SHIP NAME: [[UNSC Pillar of Autumn|UNSC PILLAR OF AUTUMN]]
|SHIP NAME: [[UNSC Pillar of Autumn|UNSC PILLAR OF AUTUMN]]



Revision as of 20:43, October 27, 2012

SHIP NAME: UNSC PILLAR OF AUTUMN


REGISTRY: C-709
CLASS: Halcyon-class Light Cruiser
LAUNCH DATE: December 1, 2510
REFIT DATE: March 19, 2550

LENGTH: 1,171m
BEAM: 352m

ENGINE CONFIG:

Mark II Hanley-Messer DFR (3)
Series V CODEN/SFTE – Main (1)


ARMAMENT:

MAC (1)
Missile Delivery System (10 pods x 24 missiles, M58 “Archer”)
Point Defense System (40 guns, 50mm M910 PDN)


Not terribly surprised at this selection due the over-bulked, overmassed honeycomb interstitial framework. It’s ironic, I suppose, that the same absurd design that forced this ship into the scrap yard years ago is resurrecting it for RED FLAG.

A cruiser was an obvious choice, as noted in my prelim, but the reason she opted for a Halcyon - this particular Halcyon, in fact – is because it can take an incredible beating without suffering functional compromise far longer than any other ships we current field.

She might be slow and cumbersome, but she’s a real beast, especially now that they’ve tweaked her armament. Good choice.