Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| ::Its alright. Side note, doing that many edits on your first day really gives admins and so on heart attacks(especially after a situation we had recently). If you want a suggestion, if was you slow down. See what is reverted/kept, and base future edits on that. Cause seriously that helped me around my early days friend. :) I like don't see any bad intent from ye after all.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 17:27, 7 February 2017 (EST) | | ::Its alright. Side note, doing that many edits on your first day really gives admins and so on heart attacks(especially after a situation we had recently). If you want a suggestion, if was you slow down. See what is reverted/kept, and base future edits on that. Cause seriously that helped me around my early days friend. :) I like don't see any bad intent from ye after all.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 17:27, 7 February 2017 (EST) |
|
| |
| All right, will make sure to bear that advice in mind and calm the speed down. Thanks bud. I tend to be quite passionate regarding categories and consistency; what makes a victory more significant than another as you say on the Mombasa page etc. --[[User:Jarr|Jarr]] ([[User talk:Jarr|talk]]) 17:31, 7 February 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Word replacing ==
| |
|
| |
| Hi, okay sooo, I don't wanna be mean or anything buuuut.
| |
|
| |
| Most, if not all of your edits are just you replacing words with synonyms for no reason. While I will [http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Community_Central:Assume_good_faith assume good faith] of you, it might be hard for others to do so as it comes across as either: trying to increase edit count to rank up or trolling. The edit on the Covenant page "Following the death of the Prophet of Regret, the Prophet of Truth '''naughtily''' gave the Jiralhanae command over the Covenant's fleets." definitely seems a bit fishy.
| |
|
| |
| So you might wanna be more professional with your edits, alright? Seeing your funny edits gave me a good laugh xD But try to be a bit more serious about it yeah? Just some advice[[User:Editorguy|Editorguy]] ([[User talk:Editorguy|talk]]) 17:31, 7 February 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Oh right, I put naughtily because I thought whas Truth did was very much a dick move to do to the race that had protected his kind for so long. --[[User:Jarr|Jarr]] ([[User talk:Jarr|talk]]) 17:32, 7 February 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| :It '''was''' a dick move xD but describing it as "naughtily" comes across as '''very''' unprofessional haha xD. The only opinions we can have in articles are opinions of other characters.[[User:Editorguy|Editorguy]] ([[User talk:Editorguy|talk]]) 17:34, 7 February 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Was the New Labour reference with regards to ONI too far do you think? I mean it was reverted but I thought it was a reasonable brownie-point contextual reference a bit like how at one time trivia compared WW2 to the Human-Covenant War --[[User:Jarr|Jarr]] ([[User talk:Jarr|talk]]) 17:36, 7 February 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| :I didn't see that edit. But anything that is trivia-esque belongs in the trivia section of articles. Or you can make a section if it doesn't exist.[[User:Editorguy|Editorguy]] ([[User talk:Editorguy|talk]]) 17:38, 7 February 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Thing is I did put it in the trivia section but I think that Alertfriend fella reverted it --[[User:Jarr|Jarr]] ([[User talk:Jarr|talk]]) 17:38, 7 February 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| It was reverted because it was factually incorrect. [[User:Alertfiend|Alertfiend]] - Warning, my comments may appear passive aggressive. <small>([[User talk:AlertFiend|Converse]]) </small> 17:41, 7 February 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| So how could I factually correct it? The comparison is legit after all if you think Iraq War --[[User:Jarr|Jarr]] ([[User talk:Jarr|talk]]) 17:42, 7 February 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| :I'm sorry, I can't assume good faith of you anymore, you're totally trolling xD I'm staying out of this mess.[[User:Editorguy|Editorguy]] ([[User talk:Editorguy|talk]]) 17:45, 7 February 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| I'm not trolling mate seriously. There was a Did you Know section that talked about ONI tricking the Navy into attacking a Jackal base under a false pretext. --[[User:Jarr|Jarr]] ([[User talk:Jarr|talk]]) 17:46, 7 February 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| The two events are no where near comparable when you line up what caused it, what happened, and the aftermath. So no, they are not legit when compared. [[User:Alertfiend|Alertfiend]] - Warning, my comments may appear passive aggressive. <small>([[User talk:AlertFiend|Converse]]) </small> 17:50, 7 February 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Their's always the integrity and the build up to it though. Reason for the operation. --[[User:Jarr|Jarr]] ([[User talk:Jarr|talk]]) 17:51, 7 February 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ==Minor note==
| |
| For future use, use ":"(a colons) to help make reading talk pages easier friend. I do admit took me awhile to learn that myself as I avoided using talk pages for ages. xD
| |
|
| |
| For example a conversation could look like this.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 17:55, 7 February 2017 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Hello this is Chris.-- 0 colon
| |
| :I am John.-- 1 colon
| |
| ::I am Kelly.-- 2 colons
| |
| :::I am Fred.-- 3 colons
| |
|
| |
| (indent reset)I am Linda.-- Resetting indents so they don't cause problems with the conversation.
| |
|
| |
| == Just out of interest ==
| |
|
| |
| Who threw the first punch in the Forerunner-Precursor war, who was more in the wrong? Forerunners for throwing a tantrum over not being chosen, or Precursors for not anticipating the Forerunners rising against them and being overconfident? --[[User:Jarr|Jarr]] ([[User talk:Jarr|talk]]) 18:31, 7 February 2017 (EST)
| |