Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 16: |
Line 16: |
| ::Sounds good. I'll still work on the [[User:Sith Venator/Draft|draft]] until then.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 00:43, 23 October 2014 (EDT) | | ::Sounds good. I'll still work on the [[User:Sith Venator/Draft|draft]] until then.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 00:43, 23 October 2014 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
| I know it has been a few months, but I wanted to throw my two cents in. First of all, in regards to [[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] on August of 2014, I would take anything Palace Hotel says with a grain of salt. Remember it is an alternate telling of Halo 2, so it's not explicitly canon. Second I don't usually like retcons at all but with the gathering of more information, the statement from Catalog, and the very appearance of the Type 36 in comparison to the Type 47, I would say 343 has retconned the Scarab from Halo 2 as being a Super Scarab. They appear the same in design and size and both sport super powered main guns in comparison to the Halo 3 type scarab. | | I know it has been a few months, but I wanted to through my two cents in. First of all, in regards to [[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] on August of 2014, I would take anything Palace Hotel says with a grain of salt. Remember it is an alternate telling of Halo 2, so it's not explicitly canon. Second I don't usually like retcons at all but with the gathering of more information, the statement from Catalog, and the very appearance of the Type 36 in comparison to the Type 47, I would say 343 has retconned the Scarab from Halo 2 as being a Super Scarab. They appear the same in design and size and both sport super powered main guns in comparison to the Halo 3 type scarab. |
|
| |
|
| I know I am a junior member, so what I say doesn't mean much at all. But I just wanted to throw in my support of including the Halo 2 Scarab in the Type 36 article. Of course I do understand if we do not have enough information to do so.[[User:Rprince418|Rprince418]] ([[User talk:Rprince418|talk]]) 10:56, 10 November 2014 (EST) | | I know I am a junior member, so what I say doesn't mean much at all. But I just wanted to throw in my support of including the Halo 2 Scarab in the Type 36 article. Of course I do understand if we do not have enough information to do so.[[User:Rprince418|Rprince418]] ([[User talk:Rprince418|talk]]) 10:56, 10 November 2014 (EST) |
|
| |
| :''"I know I am a junior member, so what I say doesn't mean much at all."'': Veterancy on this wiki means nothing (save for the occasional "get a life!"). What matters is what you can contribute to the wiki. Just have to clarify this.— <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 11:11, 10 November 2014 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ::Thanks. Also, Sith Venator I do have a suggestion on the draft. The main picture you have is very cool, but in my opinion does not make for a good main picture. The smog is covering up most of the vehicle. I would suggest putting the one you have below it, with the white background. It may not be as neat, but it gives a better view of the Scarab. I would keep the current main picture and put it in the gallery section however as it is neat and relevant to the article in question. However that is just what I would do and just a suggestion at that. Obviously the end result is up to you.[[User:Rprince418|Rprince418]] ([[User talk:Rprince418|talk]]) 18:08, 10 November 2014 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| :::As he said, it's only a draft made on his personal page, so this bad image would almost certainly never make it as the official page's main image. Anyway we'll probably get a better image of the ''Halo 2 Anniversary'' Scarab in the near future. Or at least, I hope so. I can't stand 343i's stance on not having Campaign Theater anymore. We'll have to rely on cinematics and, possibly, renders if Blur ever release some of their development stuff (not certain). More generally, I do suspect than the Scarab's designation was retconned, simply due to the fact that the ''Halo 2'' and the ''Halo 3'' versions look too different. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 18:34, 10 November 2014 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ::::Yah, thanks for clarification. Like I said, I am new to this so I am still getting used to the procedure. If I ever come across as bossy or pushy, I apologize as that's not my intent. If I knew I had the authorization to do it, I would also try to change the page. But since he beat me to it and I would probably accidentally add information that is not confirmed, I feel like it's best for me to sit back and observe until I get enough experience. As such Sith is doing a great job on the draft, I just didn't know how they went. And that pisses me off about theater too. I liked to get different angles on things that happened on the game.[[User:Rprince418|Rprince418]] ([[User talk:Rprince418|talk]]) 18:59, 10 November 2014 (EST)
| |