Editing Talk:Sangheili General
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
It looks like someone used the multiplayer gold coloring, went to Custom Games, and took a snapshot of himself. [[User talk:Missing Mandible|Missing Mandible]] 16:33, 15 April 2011 (EDT) | It looks like someone used the multiplayer gold coloring, went to Custom Games, and took a snapshot of himself. [[User talk:Missing Mandible|Missing Mandible]] 16:33, 15 April 2011 (EDT) | ||
:We're in the process of improving images. See Forum:Pictures Wanted!.— <span style="font-size:120%; font-family:Palatino Linotype; font-style:italic;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 16:49, 15 April 2011 (EDT) | :We're in the process of improving images. See [[Forum:Pictures Wanted!]].— <span style="font-size:120%; font-family:Palatino Linotype; font-style:italic;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 16:49, 15 April 2011 (EDT) | ||
::But you can't just use images from Multiplayer. This is not the correct coloring for the General Rank. It is better trying to get images from the Campaign or Firefight, rather than Multiplayer-espescially because you cannot imitate accurately the real deal when its coloring is not available in the multiplayer setting. [[User talk:Missing Mandible|Missing Mandible]] 16:48, 16 April 2011 (EDT) | ::But you can't just use images from Multiplayer. This is not the correct coloring for the General Rank. It is better trying to get images from the Campaign or Firefight, rather than Multiplayer-espescially because you cannot imitate accurately the real deal when its coloring is not available in the multiplayer setting. [[User talk:Missing Mandible|Missing Mandible]] 16:48, 16 April 2011 (EDT) | ||
:::As I said before, we're in the process of improving images. As such, not everything would be 100% accurate. >.> | :::As I said before, we're in the process of improving images. As such, not everything would be 100% accurate. >.> | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
While I don't really agree that it's a big deal, I do think it's a valid point that the coloring on the multiplayer version is slightly off - The Campaign version has two tones of gold, while the one in the snapshot has one solid tone. I get that the wiki is in the process of image renovation and all, but I don't think there's really any advantages to using a multiplayer model over the Campaign model for the article image. After all, there should be some decent neutrally-posed Generals in Campaign ''somewhere'' [[User talk:SPARTAN-347|SPARTAN-347]] 23:43, 16 April 2011 (EDT) | While I don't really agree that it's a big deal, I do think it's a valid point that the coloring on the multiplayer version is slightly off - The Campaign version has two tones of gold, while the one in the snapshot has one solid tone. I get that the wiki is in the process of image renovation and all, but I don't think there's really any advantages to using a multiplayer model over the Campaign model for the article image. After all, there should be some decent neutrally-posed Generals in Campaign ''somewhere'' [[User talk:SPARTAN-347|SPARTAN-347]] 23:43, 16 April 2011 (EDT) | ||