Editing Talk:SPARTAN-B312
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archived | {{Archived}} | ||
== S-312's superior == | == S-312's superior == | ||
| Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
... needs to be revised on two counts. Firstly, the introduction as well as the opening quote needs to be reverted to its previous revision. The current quote would fit nicely in the "Death" section whereas the previous section fits nicely with his overall personality (or what's left of it to the player's imagination). The introduction should be the most condensed paragraph about the subject and its job should be to introduce the subject to readers. There is no need of an overview/summary of his biography/characterisation in the introduction. | ... needs to be revised on two counts. Firstly, the introduction as well as the opening quote needs to be reverted to its previous revision. The current quote would fit nicely in the "Death" section whereas the previous section fits nicely with his overall personality (or what's left of it to the player's imagination). The introduction should be the most condensed paragraph about the subject and its job should be to introduce the subject to readers. There is no need of an overview/summary of his biography/characterisation in the introduction. | ||
Secondly, this image needs to be altered: Noble Six should be in his default configuration. We've already discussed about this years ago. On the subject of "what we've agreed years ago", it should be noted that we've also agreed that his birth date provided in GameInformer is [[Talk:SPARTAN-B312/Archive_1#Date_of_Birth|likely to be an error made by the editor]]. | Secondly, [[:File:Noble_Six_Arrives.png|this image needs to be altered]]: Noble Six should be in his default configuration. We've already discussed about this years ago. On the subject of "what we've agreed years ago", it should be noted that we've also agreed that his birth date provided in GameInformer is [[Talk:SPARTAN-B312/Archive_1#Date_of_Birth|likely to be an error made by the editor]]. | ||
Oh, congrats Tuckers on becoming an administrator. All those red buttons!! — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 09:35, 15 July 2013 (EDT) | Oh, congrats Tuckers on becoming an administrator. All those red buttons!! — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 09:35, 15 July 2013 (EDT) | ||
| Line 94: | Line 93: | ||
:::Kindly provide a source to back up your statement. Until then, cease edit warring. [[User:Auguststorm1945|Auguststorm1945]] ([[User talk:Auguststorm1945|talk]]) 21:03, 25 September 2013 (EDT) | :::Kindly provide a source to back up your statement. Until then, cease edit warring. [[User:Auguststorm1945|Auguststorm1945]] ([[User talk:Auguststorm1945|talk]]) 21:03, 25 September 2013 (EDT) | ||
::DC, there is a difference between gameplay mechanics and non-canon. In ''Halo 3'', when and where the Arbiter appears depends on whether you're playing solo or cooperative campaign, but neither would be canonically incorrect. Conversely, in ''Halo: Combat Evolved'', there are clearly two Spartans visible in cooperative play, and yet you wouldn't say that there were two Spartans present on Alpha Halo. But in ''Halo: Reach'', the fact that Noble Six's role to the plot is actually the pivotal point of the campaign, then you can't say that he/she is non-canon. Because if you're going to confuse gameplay mechanics and non-canon, then you could very well say that no one actually delivered Cortana to Captain Keyes at the end of ''Halo: Reach'', therefore the events of all games that came after (chronologically) did not happen. Which, of course, is ridiculous. | ::DC, there is a difference between gameplay mechanics and non-canon. In ''Halo 3'', when and where the Arbiter appears depends on whether you're playing solo or cooperative campaign, but neither would be canonically incorrect. Conversely, in ''Halo: Combat Evolved'', there are clearly two Spartans visible in cooperative play, and yet you wouldn't say that there were two Spartans present on Alpha Halo. But in ''Halo: Reach'', the fact that Noble Six's role to the plot is actually the pivotal point of the campaign, then you can't say that he/she is non-canon. Because if you're going to confuse gameplay mechanics and non-canon, then you could very well say that no one actually delivered Cortana to Captain Keyes at the end of ''Halo: Reach'', therefore the events of all games that came after (chronologically) did not happen. Which, of course, is ridiculous. {{Sonasig}} 21:09, 25 September 2013 (EDT) | ||
::::You've both misinterpreted my meaning in that there is no canon Noble Six. There's no canon ''identity'' '''of''' Noble Six. It is whatever the player presents him or her as. Noble Six is you in other words. --[[User:DC Ambrose|DC Ambrose]] ([[User talk:DC Ambrose|talk]]) 21:36, 25 September 2013 (EDT) | ::::You've both misinterpreted my meaning in that there is no canon Noble Six. There's no canon ''identity'' '''of''' Noble Six. It is whatever the player presents him or her as. Noble Six is you in other words. --[[User:DC Ambrose|DC Ambrose]] ([[User talk:DC Ambrose|talk]]) 21:36, 25 September 2013 (EDT) | ||
| Line 143: | Line 142: | ||
Invoking [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor Occam's Razor], the simplest answer is "Six concurred so Kat said 'Me too'", not "Kat completely ignored Six and so her line about Six was basically with no context or good reason for including it and forces the listener to ignore her when she could've just said something different". Therefore, we go with the former. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 14:03, 9 September 2015 (EDT) | Invoking [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor Occam's Razor], the simplest answer is "Six concurred so Kat said 'Me too'", not "Kat completely ignored Six and so her line about Six was basically with no context or good reason for including it and forces the listener to ignore her when she could've just said something different". Therefore, we go with the former. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 14:03, 9 September 2015 (EDT) | ||