Editing Talk:SPARTAN-B312
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archived | {{Archived}} | ||
== S-312's superior == | == S-312's superior == | ||
Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
... needs to be revised on two counts. Firstly, the introduction as well as the opening quote needs to be reverted to its previous revision. The current quote would fit nicely in the "Death" section whereas the previous section fits nicely with his overall personality (or what's left of it to the player's imagination). The introduction should be the most condensed paragraph about the subject and its job should be to introduce the subject to readers. There is no need of an overview/summary of his biography/characterisation in the introduction. | ... needs to be revised on two counts. Firstly, the introduction as well as the opening quote needs to be reverted to its previous revision. The current quote would fit nicely in the "Death" section whereas the previous section fits nicely with his overall personality (or what's left of it to the player's imagination). The introduction should be the most condensed paragraph about the subject and its job should be to introduce the subject to readers. There is no need of an overview/summary of his biography/characterisation in the introduction. | ||
Secondly, this image needs to be altered: Noble Six should be in his default configuration. We've already discussed about this years ago. On the subject of "what we've agreed years ago", it should be noted that we've also agreed that his birth date provided in GameInformer is [[Talk:SPARTAN-B312/Archive_1#Date_of_Birth|likely to be an error made by the editor]]. | Secondly, [[:File:Noble_Six_Arrives.png|this image needs to be altered]]: Noble Six should be in his default configuration. We've already discussed about this years ago. On the subject of "what we've agreed years ago", it should be noted that we've also agreed that his birth date provided in GameInformer is [[Talk:SPARTAN-B312/Archive_1#Date_of_Birth|likely to be an error made by the editor]]. | ||
Oh, congrats Tuckers on becoming an administrator. All those red buttons!! — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 09:35, 15 July 2013 (EDT) | Oh, congrats Tuckers on becoming an administrator. All those red buttons!! — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 09:35, 15 July 2013 (EDT) | ||
Line 65: | Line 64: | ||
:: I'll try and figure out what my userpage is (still new to wiki stuff) and I'll upload some of the better ones. I think I already have some from your list. I would like to ask what should be represented in the Noble Six's article. Since 343i (and Bungie before them) only considers Noble Six to be male from a canonical standpoint within the fiction and that female Six is only a gameplay option for players, is it appropriate to have female Six pics in the character article of only on a Halo Reach Video Game type of page that includes info like Theater and Forge? - [[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 22:59, 19 July 2013 (EDT) | :: I'll try and figure out what my userpage is (still new to wiki stuff) and I'll upload some of the better ones. I think I already have some from your list. I would like to ask what should be represented in the Noble Six's article. Since 343i (and Bungie before them) only considers Noble Six to be male from a canonical standpoint within the fiction and that female Six is only a gameplay option for players, is it appropriate to have female Six pics in the character article of only on a Halo Reach Video Game type of page that includes info like Theater and Forge? - [[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 22:59, 19 July 2013 (EDT) | ||
:Figured it out faster than I thought. Pics up for your review/inclusion on my UserWiki:ScaleMaster117]]. - [[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 23:34, 19 July 2013 (EDT) | :Figured it out faster than I thought. Pics up for your review/inclusion on my [[UserWiki:ScaleMaster117]]. - [[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 23:34, 19 July 2013 (EDT) | ||
Thanks! I review them all. But I don't understand your question. What do you mean by "a Halo Reach Video Game type of page"? [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 14:27, 20 July 2013 (EDT) | Thanks! I review them all. But I don't understand your question. What do you mean by "a Halo Reach Video Game type of page"? [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 14:27, 20 July 2013 (EDT) | ||
Line 94: | Line 93: | ||
:::Kindly provide a source to back up your statement. Until then, cease edit warring. [[User:Auguststorm1945|Auguststorm1945]] ([[User talk:Auguststorm1945|talk]]) 21:03, 25 September 2013 (EDT) | :::Kindly provide a source to back up your statement. Until then, cease edit warring. [[User:Auguststorm1945|Auguststorm1945]] ([[User talk:Auguststorm1945|talk]]) 21:03, 25 September 2013 (EDT) | ||
::DC, there is a difference between gameplay mechanics and non-canon. In ''Halo 3'', when and where the Arbiter appears depends on whether you're playing solo or cooperative campaign, but neither would be canonically incorrect. Conversely, in ''Halo: Combat Evolved'', there are clearly two Spartans visible in cooperative play, and yet you wouldn't say that there were two Spartans present on Alpha Halo. But in ''Halo: Reach'', the fact that Noble Six's role to the plot is actually the pivotal point of the campaign, then you can't say that he/she is non-canon. Because if you're going to confuse gameplay mechanics and non-canon, then you could very well say that no one actually delivered Cortana to Captain Keyes at the end of ''Halo: Reach'', therefore the events of all games that came after (chronologically) did not happen. Which, of course, is ridiculous. | ::DC, there is a difference between gameplay mechanics and non-canon. In ''Halo 3'', when and where the Arbiter appears depends on whether you're playing solo or cooperative campaign, but neither would be canonically incorrect. Conversely, in ''Halo: Combat Evolved'', there are clearly two Spartans visible in cooperative play, and yet you wouldn't say that there were two Spartans present on Alpha Halo. But in ''Halo: Reach'', the fact that Noble Six's role to the plot is actually the pivotal point of the campaign, then you can't say that he/she is non-canon. Because if you're going to confuse gameplay mechanics and non-canon, then you could very well say that no one actually delivered Cortana to Captain Keyes at the end of ''Halo: Reach'', therefore the events of all games that came after (chronologically) did not happen. Which, of course, is ridiculous. {{Sonasig}} 21:09, 25 September 2013 (EDT) | ||
::::You've both misinterpreted my meaning in that there is no canon Noble Six. There's no canon ''identity'' '''of''' Noble Six. It is whatever the player presents him or her as. Noble Six is you in other words. --[[User:DC Ambrose|DC Ambrose]] ([[User talk:DC Ambrose|talk]]) 21:36, 25 September 2013 (EDT) | ::::You've both misinterpreted my meaning in that there is no canon Noble Six. There's no canon ''identity'' '''of''' Noble Six. It is whatever the player presents him or her as. Noble Six is you in other words. --[[User:DC Ambrose|DC Ambrose]] ([[User talk:DC Ambrose|talk]]) 21:36, 25 September 2013 (EDT) | ||
Line 137: | Line 136: | ||
:He still probably nodded offscreen. If the line hadn't been truthful, Kat would've responded with something like: "It's mine" instead or "Me too". [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 21:09, 7 September 2015 (EDT) | :He still probably nodded offscreen. If the line hadn't been truthful, Kat would've responded with something like: "It's mine" instead or "Me too". [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 21:09, 7 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
Good chance he concurred if she responded with "Me too" [[User:Alertfiend|Alertfiend]] ([[User talk:Alertfiend|talk]]) 21:28, 7 September 2015 (EDT) | Good chance he concurred if she responded with "Me too" [[User:Alertfiend|Alertfiend]] ([[User talk:Alertfiend|talk]]) 21:28, 7 September 2015 (EDT) | ||