You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with
other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 7: |
Line 7: |
|
| |
|
| ==Deletion== | | ==Deletion== |
| We need to merge this page with Quito Space Tether and deleted it. This interrogation did indeed take place at the top of the tether.{{Unsigned|Japeth555}} | | We need to merge this page with Quito Space Tether and deleted it. This interrogation did indeed take place at the top of the tether. |
| :I propose that we keep this page and just rename it "Crimson Wing" as per the loot crate reveal. [[User:Lord Susto|<span style="color:orange">Lord Susto</span>]] 22:25, 26 October 2016 (EDT) | | :I propose that we keep this page and just rename it "Crimson Wing" as per the loot crate reveal. [[User:Lord Susto|<span style="color:orange">Lord Susto</span>]] 22:25, 26 October 2016 (EDT) |
| ::Or "Quito Terminus", since that's what the space station is called that the tether is actually connected to (the equivalent of the Tiara). Then just mention Crimson Wing on that page. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 22:51, 26 October 2016 (EDT)
| |
| :::I only removed a portion of the trivia about it sharing the geometry with Orbital. The station seen on the map is a civilian docking station, while Quito Terminus seems completely different. Who knows, it may actually be the same station.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 11:24, 1 November 2016 (EDT)
| |
| ::::The Loot Crate states it's an "ONI-appropriated wing" of the Quito Terminus, which would enable them to be the same location; ONI merely seized control of it during the battle. --[[User:Jugus|Jugus]] ([[User talk:Jugus|talk]]) 01:39, 3 November 2016 (EDT)
| |