Editing Talk:Point Blank-class prowler
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This isn't a [[UNSC Prowler]]? --[[User:Omrifere|Omrifere]] 00:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC) | This isn't a [[UNSC Prowler]]? --[[User:Omrifere|Omrifere]] 00:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
No it is not. A UNSC Prowler is much smaller than a Destroyer. The exsictance of this type of ship is undeniable. Please read Ghosts of Onyx. --[[User:UNSC AI|Will]] 20:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | No it is not. A UNSC Prowler is much smaller than a Destroyer. The exsictance of this type of ship is undeniable. Please read Ghosts of Onyx. --[[User:UNSC AI|Will]] 20:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
:yes. Cheers, <tt>[[user:RelentlessRecusant|49 Proximal Secant]]<sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:RelentlessRecusant|oracle]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup></tt> | :yes. Cheers, <tt>[[user:RelentlessRecusant|49 Proximal Secant]]<sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:RelentlessRecusant|oracle]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup></tt>[[Image:H3 Monitor.PNG|25px]] 17:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Possibility of Falsehood == | == Possibility of Falsehood == | ||
Some of the specs posted in the ship's chart maybe incorrect. I'm openly admitting this, becuase since it is a ''Prowler''-class i used some info from normal [[UNSC Prowler]]s. Althought this is just a possiblty cause i assumed things, but everything else is correct. Just there may be some flasehoods in the chart. --[[User:Donut THX 1138]] | Some of the specs posted in the ship's chart maybe incorrect. I'm openly admitting this, becuase since it is a ''Prowler''-class i used some info from normal [[UNSC Prowler]]s. Althought this is just a possiblty cause i assumed things, but everything else is correct. Just there may be some flasehoods in the chart. --[[User:Donut THX 1138]] [[Image:Donut 7.JPG|35px]] 01:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
I also have a problem with "Only some twenty officers in the entire galaxy had ever seen the ship." That line only applies to the high security Faraday Cage/conference room on board the ''Point of No Return'' and not the actual ship itself. (Just think about it. A cruiser which would need to be crewed by less than 20 people. Virtually impossible) As such I shall be amending this article accordingly. -- [[User:TheObviousOne|TheObviousOne]] 00:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | I also have a problem with "Only some twenty officers in the entire galaxy had ever seen the ship." That line only applies to the high security Faraday Cage/conference room on board the ''Point of No Return'' and not the actual ship itself. (Just think about it. A cruiser which would need to be crewed by less than 20 people. Virtually impossible) As such I shall be amending this article accordingly. -- [[User:TheObviousOne|TheObviousOne]] 00:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
Actually, a ships is mainly run by crewman. The only officers aboard a ship are those in the bridge and a select few others. The ''[[Pillar of Autumn]]'', for example, had a total of six or so officers. | Actually, a ships is mainly run by crewman. The only officers aboard a ship are those in the bridge and a select few others. The ''[[Pillar of Autumn]]'', for example, had a total of six or so officers. | ||
:--'''[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rot]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Rotaretilbo|Brandon]]</sup> 05:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | :--'''[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rot]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Rotaretilbo|Brandon]]</sup> 05:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | ||