You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with
other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 144: |
Line 144: |
| Guilty Spark did NOT go rampant. His programming told him to protect his Halo at any cost, and that's what he did, just like in Halo 1. | | Guilty Spark did NOT go rampant. His programming told him to protect his Halo at any cost, and that's what he did, just like in Halo 1. |
|
| |
|
| :He did, don't you think stopping the Flood would have higher priority than saving his little ring? And by the way, sign your posts. [[User talk:H91|H91]] 17:33, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| :He was also programmed to protect the reclaimers and help them activate the ring. Having to ignore the last two to keep it intact shows that he has gone against his programming. He did nothing of the sort in the first game, anyway - he was hunting down John and Cortana because AI constructs aren't allowed in the computer core. Hell, he only tried to stop the detonation of the Autumn directly once - the rest of his time went to trying to stop it by telling John that the information in the ship's computer would be a waste if it was destroyed.-- [[User talk:Forerunner|Forerunner]] 17:50, 21 December 2010 (EST)
| | |
| | He did, don't you think stopping the Flood would have higher priority than saving his little ring? And by the way, sign your posts. [[User talk:H91|H91]] 17:33, February 24, 2010 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| Guys! Spark Wasn't Rampant! Read this!! | | Guys! Spark Wasn't Rampant! Read this!! |