Editing Talk:Michael Stanforth
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't think he would leave the battle of reach--[[User:Ryanngreenday|Ryanngreenday]] 22:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC) | I don't think he would leave the battle of reach--[[User:Ryanngreenday|Ryanngreenday]] 22:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
:Well Reach was in FLEETCOM sector one, Stanforth commanded sector three. He may have gone back to his command before the fight. -[[User:ED|ED]] 23:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | :Well Reach was in FLEETCOM sector one, Stanforth commanded sector three. He may have gone back to his command before the fight. -[[User:ED|ED]] 23:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
At first glance this appears to be a different person from Hieronymus Michael, who would have been only 16 at the time; it seems plausible that Harold was his father, or another relative. However a problem arises in that Harold's [[Service Number]] is exactly the same as Hieronymous Michael's, 00834-19223-HS. Both men also commanded ships called the UNSC ''Leviathan'', though admittedly several decades apart. | At first glance this appears to be a different person from Hieronymus Michael, who would have been only 16 at the time; it seems plausible that Harold was his father, or another relative. However a problem arises in that Harold's [[Service Number]] is exactly the same as Hieronymous Michael's, 00834-19223-HS. Both men also commanded ships called the UNSC ''Leviathan'', though admittedly several decades apart. | ||
So what's the answer? Is Harold a seperate person who deserves his own page? Or is this a case of contradictory information on the same person? I personally think the answer is the former. Their ages are simply too far apart to be the same person, and Micheal's ''Leviathan'' was a [[Marathon-class Cruiser]], which was not around in 2503. The Service number is likely just an oversight. What does everyone else think?--[[File:Emblem 1.jpg|20px]][[User:Rusty-112|<span style="background:blue; font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt;color:white;">''' Rusty '''</span>]][[User talk:Rusty-112|<span style="background:blue; font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt;color:red;">''' - '''</span>]]UserWiki:Rusty-112|<span style="background:blue; font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt;color:white;">''' 112 '''</span>]] 20:11, May 4, 2010 (UTC) | So what's the answer? Is Harold a seperate person who deserves his own page? Or is this a case of contradictory information on the same person? I personally think the answer is the former. Their ages are simply too far apart to be the same person, and Micheal's ''Leviathan'' was a [[Marathon-class Cruiser]], which was not around in 2503. The Service number is likely just an oversight. What does everyone else think?--[[File:Emblem 1.jpg|20px]][[User:Rusty-112|<span style="background:blue; font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt;color:white;">''' Rusty '''</span>]][[User talk:Rusty-112|<span style="background:blue; font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt;color:red;">''' - '''</span>]][[UserWiki:Rusty-112|<span style="background:blue; font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt;color:white;">''' 112 '''</span>]] 20:11, May 4, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:*I agree with you, at first site of his name in ''Evolutions'', I thought it was his father. --[[user:Sgt.T.N.Biscuits|Gunnery Sergeant]] [[user_talk:Sgt.T.N.Biscuits|Pete Stacker]], [[Special:Contributions/Sgt.T.N.Biscuits|UNSC Marine Corps]] 03:10, May 5, 2010 (UTC) | :*I agree with you, at first site of his name in ''Evolutions'', I thought it was his father. --[[user:Sgt.T.N.Biscuits|Gunnery Sergeant]] [[user_talk:Sgt.T.N.Biscuits|Pete Stacker]], [[Special:Contributions/Sgt.T.N.Biscuits|UNSC Marine Corps]] 03:10, May 5, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:: The two are likely related. they may have even been intended to be the same person. who knows? but for an in-universe perspective, the Service number is likely an error.--[[User talk:WhellerNG|WhellerNG]] 21:24, August 3, 2010 (UTC) | :: The two are likely related. they may have even been intended to be the same person. who knows? but for an in-universe perspective, the Service number is likely an error.--[[User talk:WhellerNG|WhellerNG]] 21:24, August 3, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Line 46: | Line 45: | ||
Herefor it seems highly likely to me that unnamed vice admiral mentioned in Halsey's journal is in fact Stanforth.--[[User talk:Thijsbos|Thijsbos]] 11:08, 29 October 2010 (EDT) | Herefor it seems highly likely to me that unnamed vice admiral mentioned in Halsey's journal is in fact Stanforth.--[[User talk:Thijsbos|Thijsbos]] 11:08, 29 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
:I would agree that they are very likely the same person. - | :I would agree that they are very likely the same person. - [[File:Black Mesa.jpg|28px]] [[User:Halo-343|<span style="color: purple; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 128%;">'''Halo-343'''</span>]] [[User talk:Halo-343|<font color="green">('''Talk''')</font>]] 11:50, 29 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
:: Jugus did so too. Is ok if I update this page with content from the Unnamed Vice Admiral page?--[[User talk:Thijsbos|Thijsbos]] 13:07, 29 October 2010 (EDT) | :: Jugus did so too. Is ok if I update this page with content from the [[Unnamed Vice Admiral]] page?--[[User talk:Thijsbos|Thijsbos]] 13:07, 29 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
:::Yeah. With all the similarities, I think it's safe to say they're one and the same. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 12:00, 4 November 2010 (EDT) | :::Yeah. With all the similarities, I think it's safe to say they're one and the same. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 12:00, 4 November 2010 (EDT) | ||
Line 68: | Line 67: | ||
'''A: Vice Admiral Michael Stanforth was born on 15 July, 2486. (CANON FODDER 4-4-15). | '''A: Vice Admiral Michael Stanforth was born on 15 July, 2486. (CANON FODDER 4-4-15). | ||
We have to add another inconsistency, because the ONI memorial says 3 July 2486. Also, 343 had a chance to solve all the inconsistencies, but they didn't, why? At this point we may reconsider the existence of two Stanforth, they could be father and son to explain the similar name, and Parangosky maybe calls the vice admiral "Harold" as "Harold junior" in a sort of colloquial nostalgia to his father. | We have to add another inconsistency, because the ONI memorial says 3 July 2486. Also, 343 had a chance to solve all the inconsistencies, but they didn't, why? At this point we may reconsider the existence of two Stanforth, they could be father and son to explain the similar name, and Parangosky maybe calls the vice admiral "Harold" as "Harold junior" in a sort of colloquial nostalgia to his father. | ||