Editing Talk:Marcus Stacker

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 318: Line 318:
:::''"we don't even have any evidence that Stacker was present on Installation 04 in the first place"'' - Yes we do. The CE character was named Stacker by Bungie, and since it is possible for this Stacker to appear (with his voice and face) in two campaign levels, we have evidence that Stacker was present on Installation 04.
:::''"we don't even have any evidence that Stacker was present on Installation 04 in the first place"'' - Yes we do. The CE character was named Stacker by Bungie, and since it is possible for this Stacker to appear (with his voice and face) in two campaign levels, we have evidence that Stacker was present on Installation 04.


:::The decision to ''judge his possible appearances as non-canon'' has huge implications in our Canon policy and how we present canon information we get from games. It cannot be taken so lightly, because it would affect how we extract canon information from gameplay. I know this was based on a conversations on Discord, and we need to hear opinions from other members. —<span style="font-family: Eurostile;">'''[[User:Spartan331|<span style="color:#000;">SPARTAN</span>]][[User talk:Spartan331|<span style="color:#888;">331</span>]]'''</span> 05:35, March 26, 2020 (EDT)
:::The decision to ''judge his possible appearances as non-canon'' has huge implications in our Canon Policy and how we present canon information we get from games. It cannot be taken so lightly, because it would affect how we extract canon information from gameplay. I know this was based on a conversations on Discord, and we need to hear opinions from other members. —<span style="font-family: Eurostile;">'''[[User:Spartan331|<span style="color:#000;">SPARTAN</span>]][[User talk:Spartan331|<span style="color:#888;">331</span>]]'''</span> 05:35, March 26, 2020 (EDT)


:::: Of course we don't only use in-universe sources, I never implied that. And I would hold that the source you linked isn't evidence to suggest any in-universe name is intended, rather just nicknaming him after his Voice Actor. "Voice of the Grunt" and "Voice of Sarge" don't exactly indicate a strict format to those outtake labels. Here's an incredibly similar source where a Bungie employee refers to Sergeant Banks as "Sergeant Jones" for example despite calling other characters by their in-universe names: http://nikon.bungie.org/misc/voices.html
:::: Of course we don't only use in-universe sources, I never implied that. And I would hold that the source you linked isn't evidence to suggest any in-universe name is intended, rather just nicknaming him after his Voice Actor. "Voice of the Grunt" and "Voice of Sarge" don't exactly indicate a strict format to those outtake labels. Here's an incredibly similar source where a Bungie employee refers to Sergeant Banks as "Sergeant Jones" for example despite calling other characters by their in-universe names: http://nikon.bungie.org/misc/voices.html
Line 334: Line 334:
:::::”And I would hold that the source you linked isn't evidence to suggest any in-universe name is intended, rather just nicknaming him after his Voice Actor.” - Except you shouldn’t, because all of the other video have names which tied the ‘’’established names’’’ of in-universe characters to their voice actors (Cortana to Jen Taylor, McKaige to Dubbo, Wicklund to Jenkins, Diaz to Mendoza). In fact, this might be the only place where Wicklund is credited for playing Jenkins. You are saying that information (which also contains ‘’working titles/names’’, as in not-yet finalised names for characters who haven’t been named in 2001, such as [[Samuel Marcus]] as “Cryp Tech”) posted on HBO by a Bungie employee in 2001 cannot be overwritten by information (most rote recently updated ones) on Bungie.net, posted by a Bungie employee in 2007. That’s ridiculous.
:::::”And I would hold that the source you linked isn't evidence to suggest any in-universe name is intended, rather just nicknaming him after his Voice Actor.” - Except you shouldn’t, because all of the other video have names which tied the ‘’’established names’’’ of in-universe characters to their voice actors (Cortana to Jen Taylor, McKaige to Dubbo, Wicklund to Jenkins, Diaz to Mendoza). In fact, this might be the only place where Wicklund is credited for playing Jenkins. You are saying that information (which also contains ‘’working titles/names’’, as in not-yet finalised names for characters who haven’t been named in 2001, such as [[Samuel Marcus]] as “Cryp Tech”) posted on HBO by a Bungie employee in 2001 cannot be overwritten by information (most rote recently updated ones) on Bungie.net, posted by a Bungie employee in 2007. That’s ridiculous.


:::::Your entire argument hinges on the fact that CE Stacker wasn’t named in the game files or dialogue. Except isn’t the first time we have had in-game characters named retroactively outside of the retail game: [[Parker]], [[Waller]], [[Zuka Zamamee]], [[Ardo 'Moretumee]], [[Avitus]], [[Cethegus]]. And once again, just because the perfect Stacker (correct face and appearance) can’t spawn on some play through, doesn’t mean we can ignore the cases where the perfect Stacker ‘’does’’ spawn (this making a canon appearance).
:::::Your entire argument hinges on the fact that CE Stacker wasn’t named in the game files or dialogue. Except isn’t the first time we have had in-game characters named retroactively outside of the retail game: [[Parker]], [[Waller]], [[Zuka Zamamee]], [[Ardo 'Moretumee]], [[Thrallslayer]], [[Cethegus]]. And once again, just because the perfect Stacker (correct face and appearance) can’t spawn on some play through, doesn’t mean we can ignore the cases where the perfect Stacker ‘’does’’ spawn (this making a canon appearance).


:::::I think we’ve both made our cases. I’ll go ahead and make it a proper vote and proposal. —<span style="font-family: Eurostile;">'''[[User:Spartan331|<span style="color:#000;">SPARTAN</span>]][[User talk:Spartan331|<span style="color:#888;">331</span>]]'''</span> 09:07, March 26, 2020 (EDT)
:::::I think we’ve both made our cases. I’ll go ahead and make it a proper vote and proposal. —<span style="font-family: Eurostile;">'''[[User:Spartan331|<span style="color:#000;">SPARTAN</span>]][[User talk:Spartan331|<span style="color:#888;">331</span>]]'''</span> 09:07, March 26, 2020 (EDT)
Line 347: Line 347:
*{{Support}} [[User:Editorguy|Editorguy]] ([[User talk:Editorguy|talk]]) 18:01, March 26, 2020 (EDT)
*{{Support}} [[User:Editorguy|Editorguy]] ([[User talk:Editorguy|talk]]) 18:01, March 26, 2020 (EDT)


*{{Support}} Given Bungie clearly intend it to be the same character (dubious canonicity/ easter egg status and all). This support is with the proviso that we just dubcanon the section regarding Installation 04, and add a production notes section explaining everything. Any "Unnamed marine sergeant" page that may hypothetically be made I wouldn't class as noteworthy enough for a full page IMO, so I'd rather keep the info here. But once again this is with the assumption we add a Semi-canon notice to the relevant information. I'd rather just give the reader ''all'' of the information, properly explain it all then let them decide what approach makes sense. [[User:BaconShelf|BaconShelf]] ([[User talk:BaconShelf|talk]]) 19:02, March 26, 2020 (EDT)
*{{Support}} Given Bungie clearly intend it to be the same character (dubious canonicity/ easter egg status and all). This support is with the proviso that we just dubcanon the section regarding Installation 04, and add a production notes section explaining everything. Any "Unnamed marine sergeant" page that may hypothetically be made I wouldn't class as noteworthy enough for a full page IMO, so I'd rather keep the info here. But once again this is with the assumption we add a semicanon notice to the relevant information. I'd rather just give the reader ''all'' of the information, properly explain it all then let them decide what approach makes sense. [[User:BaconShelf|BaconShelf]] ([[User talk:BaconShelf|talk]]) 19:02, March 26, 2020 (EDT)


::Absolutely. The info has to be mentioned here. Just not unambiguously in the biography section.[[User:TheEld|TheEld]] ([[User talk:TheEld|talk]]) 19:24, March 26, 2020 (EDT)TheEld
::Absolutely. The info has to be mentioned here. Just not unambiguously in the biography section.[[User:TheEld|TheEld]] ([[User talk:TheEld|talk]]) 19:24, March 26, 2020 (EDT)TheEld


:: Part of my argument is that the CE Marine Sergeant doesn't even have a strong case to be considered an individual character in his own right. He already represents two other Marines as well as his (hypothetical) self. I find it incredibly dubious that it was ever intended to represent one in-universe character. Even ''before'' The Flood, this guy is scripted to die in Silent Chartographer. To be clear, my proposal would still give the reader all information, just not in the in-universe Biography section. [[User:JiMMyPaZ|JiMMyPaZ]] ([[User talk:JiMMyPaZ|talk]]) 19:31, March 26, 2020 (EDT)
:: Part of my argument is that the CE Marine Sergeant doesn't even have a strong case to be considered an individual character in his own right. He already represents two other Marines as well as his (hypothetical) self. I find it incredibly dubious that it was ever intended to represent one in-universe character. Even ''before'' The Flood, this guy is scripted to die in Silent Chartographer. To be clear, my proposal would still give the reader all information, just not in the in-universe Biography section. [[User:JiMMyPaZ|JiMMyPaZ]] ([[User talk:JiMMyPaZ|talk]]) 19:31, March 26, 2020 (EDT)
*{{Support}} I have a few comments further below that illustrate my support. -[[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 10:30, March 29, 2020 (EDT)


===Neutral===
===Neutral===
*{{Neutral}} We could go the route where we move all the cases where its impossible for Stacker being at a local on I04 into its own area on the page. Explaining what he does and how he was replaced in said media. Kinda better than outright killing the info but also following what the oppose people are suggesting.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 10:29, March 29, 2020 (EDT)


===Oppose===
===Oppose===
Line 383: Line 380:


:::: I maintain that it's most likely referring to the gameplay model only. The model depicted is ''scripted''  to die in ''The Silent Cartographer'' yet still has a chance to appear in later missions. It even has a different voice if it spawns on ''Assault on the Control Room''. Would you agree that Bungie didn't intend for the "Sergeant Stacker" model to represent a single in-universe character, but multiple different people ScaleMaster117? [[User:JiMMyPaZ|JiMMyPaZ]] ([[User talk:JiMMyPaZ|talk]]) 23:34, March 26, 2020 (EDT)
:::: I maintain that it's most likely referring to the gameplay model only. The model depicted is ''scripted''  to die in ''The Silent Cartographer'' yet still has a chance to appear in later missions. It even has a different voice if it spawns on ''Assault on the Control Room''. Would you agree that Bungie didn't intend for the "Sergeant Stacker" model to represent a single in-universe character, but multiple different people ScaleMaster117? [[User:JiMMyPaZ|JiMMyPaZ]] ([[User talk:JiMMyPaZ|talk]]) 23:34, March 26, 2020 (EDT)
:::::Yes, the pic above is the figure packaging I meant...you found it before I could dig out mine. In my opinion, I think even Sgt. Johnson was almost as much a throwaway 'character' in the sense that Bungie had no idea the game/franchise would become the hit that it did. Johnson was able to be 'killed' as well in various missions. I would think (and the evidence seems to show) that as Johnson became a beloved character, so too did Stacker. The action figure pretty definitively links the game model's face with the plastic sculpt. And Pete Stacker is the voice and namesake for the character. It's all pretty well linked for me. What has to be done though is the realization that the Marines are vulnerable NPCs in Halo 1. (Even Captain Keyes could be killed as we all know, yet story-wise that's not supposed to happen by the player.) It wasn't until Halo 2 that they made characters invulnerable. In Halo 2 game code, Miranda and Johnson had a weight attribute of 10,000 whereas the Chief was something like 150 and Marines were 70 or 75....I'd have to see if the program would fire up to verify, I'm going from memory, but I think the 10,000 value meant the character was incapable of being killed by player (or NPC) weapons fire. This was not the case in Halo 1. Long story short, my opinion is that we should be looking at Sgt. Stacker as an individual character in Halo 1 who was not killed (in the fiction) even if he could be killed via the game's mechanics. -[[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 11:37, March 28, 2020 (EDT)
:::::: That's the very thing though, it's not just that "he could be killed via the game's mechanics." Marines in Silent Chartographer are killed off through dialogue and a kill script, ie the game goes out of it's way to kill them, in both the gameplay and the narrative. It seems quite a lot different to me Johnson being able to die in gameplay.[[User:JiMMyPaZ|JiMMyPaZ]] ([[User talk:JiMMyPaZ|talk]]) 04:26, March 29, 2020 (EDT)
:::::::I'm not understanding how information about Stacker will be enhanced on Halopedia by muddying the waters over his being a character in Halo 1 or not. Clearly he is in later games. It's not terribly harmful to consider him a character in Halo 1. It was clearly Bungie's intent with making the action figure him specifically rather than a generic nameless marine. To me, it would make things more confusing leaving him out of it. I would think just a trivia note saying something about how the marine bodies, heads, and voices could be swapped around would let readers know that Halo 1 was not as forward-planned as subsequent games because the popularity of Halo was a complete unknown at the time. -[[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 10:30, March 29, 2020 (EDT)
::::::::Apologies for the late reponse. I'd completely forgotten about this vote, until topic came up yet again on the Discord today, which reminded me. My thoughts are, given all the evidence shown, that Bungie's intent is clear; the Marine Sergeant in CE is meant to be Stacker. However, I still remain unconvinced that nowadays, 343 would consider that to be the case in a canonical sense. Consequently, I would personally favour moving the info about his CE appearance to the production notes section. {{User:Dab1001/Sig2}} 10:09, April 17, 2020 (EDT)

Please note that all contributions to Halopedia are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see Halopedia:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

To view or search uploaded images go to the list of images. Uploads and deletions are also logged in the upload log. For help including images on a page see Help:Images. For a sound file, use this code: [[Media:File.ogg]].

Do not copy text from other websites without permission. It will be deleted.