Editing Talk:M831 Troop Transport Warthog
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Guys, i think that all of you have not seen the e3 campaign trailer, because the tt warthog has 1 driver seat, and '''3''' passenger seats(2 in the place of the machine gun. | Guys, i think that all of you have not seen the e3 campaign trailer, because the tt warthog has 1 driver seat, and '''3''' passenger seats(2 in the place of the machine gun. | ||
[[User:Spartan-007|Spartan-G007]] | [[User:Spartan-007|Spartan-G007]] [[Image:kpisalasergod2.gif|35px]] <sup>[http://live.xbox.com/en-GB/profile/profile.aspx?pp=0&GamerTag=SpartanG007 <font color=green>XBL gamertag:SpartanG007</font>]</sup> | ||
:Incorrect. The TT Warthog has six seats in the E3 2007 demo and all other occurrences. 1 driver. 1 shotgun passenger. 4 back passengers. -[[User:Azathoth|The Dark Lord Azathoth]] 12:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | :Incorrect. The TT Warthog has six seats in the E3 2007 demo and all other occurrences. 1 driver. 1 shotgun passenger. 4 back passengers. -[[User:Azathoth|The Dark Lord Azathoth]] 12:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
I played Tsavo Highway. It only carries a total of 4 passengers: 1 in the standard "shotgun" seat, 2 in the seats in the back, facing sideways, and an extra one sitting over the edge on the back, facing backwards. There are '''NOT''' 4 passengers in the back. This originally mislead me when I played it the first time. | I played Tsavo Highway. It only carries a total of 4 passengers: 1 in the standard "shotgun" seat, 2 in the seats in the back, facing sideways, and an extra one sitting over the edge on the back, facing backwards. There are '''NOT''' 4 passengers in the back. This originally mislead me when I played it the first time. | ||
[[User:E93|<font color="Green">Eduardo Jimenez</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:E93|<font color="Blue">Comm</font>]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/E93|<font color=Gray>Contributions</font>]]</sub> | [[User:E93|<font color="Green">Eduardo Jimenez</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:E93|<font color="Blue">Comm</font>]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/E93|<font color=Gray>Contributions</font>]]</sub>[[Image:Marine_Corp_CPL.JPG|20px]][[Halopedia:UNSC of Halopedia/C Company|<font color="#000000">C Company</font>]] | ||
you also cant get in the back | you also cant get in the back | ||
(gruntlover87) | (gruntlover87) | ||
So, if you the actual player can't get in the back, this sounds kinda useless. The whole reason they put it in was for the 4 player co-op and you can't even load them all in. That's stupid! --[[User:Lordofmonsterisland| <font color="green">Lordofmonsterisland</font> | So, if you the actual player can't get in the back, this sounds kinda useless. The whole reason they put it in was for the 4 player co-op and you can't even load them all in. That's stupid! --[[User:Lordofmonsterisland| <font color="green">Lordofmonsterisland]]</font>[[User talk:Lordofmonsterisland| <font color="green">"Roar to me"</font>]] 20:31, 16 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
If you look at it it actually seems to be able to carry alot more marines than it can, however, its limited at three, and seeing as how Spartans or Elites can't get in the back, it doesn't matter :P. --[[User:Ajax 013|Ajax 013]] 20:53, 16 October 2007 (UTC) | If you look at it it actually seems to be able to carry alot more marines than it can, however, its limited at three, and seeing as how Spartans or Elites can't get in the back, it doesn't matter :P. --[[User:Ajax 013|Ajax 013]] 20:53, 16 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
Line 40: | Line 39: | ||
== Good weapon combos == | == Good weapon combos == | ||
My personal favorite is quad missile launchers (possible on The Storm) and is useful against everything. Any better suggestions for load outs. | My personal favorite is quad missile launchers (possible on The Storm) and is useful against everything. Any better suggestions for load outs. | ||
== TT W in Multiplayer == | == TT W in Multiplayer == | ||
Line 49: | Line 48: | ||
[[User:JaBrwok|JaBrwok]] 11:01, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | [[User:JaBrwok|JaBrwok]] 11:01, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
:um, you forgot that the warthog can't hold any player-controlled passengers in the rear. So you can only get 2 people across the battlefield: the driver and the passenger. Unless Bungie puts that in a new map such that you can seat in the rear...--[[User:Spartan781|'''<font color="LightGrey">Sp</font><font color="DarkGray">art</font><font color="Gray">an-</font><font color="Black">781</font>''']] | :um, you forgot that the warthog can't hold any player-controlled passengers in the rear. So you can only get 2 people across the battlefield: the driver and the passenger. Unless Bungie puts that in a new map such that you can seat in the rear...--[[User:Spartan781|'''<font color="LightGrey">Sp</font><font color="DarkGray">art</font><font color="Gray">an-</font><font color="Black">781</font>''']] [[Image:Seaman.png|25px]] <sup>[[User talk:Spartan781|<font color="black" face="Arial">Comm</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Spartan781|<font color="black" face="Arial">CSV</font>]]</sub> 13:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
Of course they would change that so the TT Hog wouldnt be so useless as it usaully is in Campaign. But you do see my point dont you? it would be pretty sweet havin a TT full of Spartans or Elites ready to engage the enemy. They should also bring back Coagulation in a map pack, Valhalla just doesnt cut it. | Of course they would change that so the TT Hog wouldnt be so useless as it usaully is in Campaign. But you do see my point dont you? it would be pretty sweet havin a TT full of Spartans or Elites ready to engage the enemy. They should also bring back Coagulation in a map pack, Valhalla just doesnt cut it. | ||
Line 72: | Line 71: | ||
== Mass? == | == Mass? == | ||
It is understandable how the transport warthog would weigh either more or less than the regular M12 LRV model, considering it lacks the chaingun and its ammunition. However, even with the roll cage, and the seats added in, would it really weigh twice as much as the chaingun model? All things considered, it should weigh considerably less, perhaps even less than the normal variant. | It is understandable how the transport warthog would weigh either more or less than the regular M12 LRV model, considering it lacks the chaingun and its ammunition. However, even with the roll cage, and the seats added in, would it really weigh twice as much as the chaingun model? All things considered, it should weigh considerably less, perhaps even less than the normal variant. | ||
== Confirmed to be in Halo 3: ODST? == | == Confirmed to be in Halo 3: ODST? == | ||
I saw on the Halo 3: ODST article that the M831 Troop Transport Warthog was listed among other vehicles that are supposed to be in the actual game, but there is no actual evidence supplied on either the Halo 3: ODST article nor the Troop Transport Warthog's article. It would be nice if someone could post some evidence confirming that this variant of the Warthog is indeed in the ODST game, especially since I always choose to drive this variant on Halo 3 whenever possible over the LRV and Gauss variants and am hoping that I can drive it on the ODST game as well. Thanks! --[[Special:Contributions/67.166.207.210|67.166.207.210]] 04:36, September 3, 2009 (UTC) | I saw on the Halo 3: ODST article that the M831 Troop Transport Warthog was listed among other vehicles that are supposed to be in the actual game, but there is no actual evidence supplied on either the Halo 3: ODST article nor the Troop Transport Warthog's article. It would be nice if someone could post some evidence confirming that this variant of the Warthog is indeed in the ODST game, especially since I always choose to drive this variant on Halo 3 whenever possible over the LRV and Gauss variants and am hoping that I can drive it on the ODST game as well. Thanks! --[[Special:Contributions/67.166.207.210|67.166.207.210]] 04:36, September 3, 2009 (UTC) | ||