Editing Talk:List of Ships
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This seems rather redundant when we already have [[:Category:Star Ships]]. --[[User:Dragonclaws|Dragonclaws]] 02:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
:I created this because I felt that that category is a disaster, no offense intended. This will be a centralized core of starship information, by race (human or the joint races of the Covenant, classification (Marathon-class Cruiser, etc...), and will provide basic info for everyy ship. Thanks. Cheers, '''[[User:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="red">Relentless</font>]][[User talk:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="blue">Recusant</font>]][[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]]''' 12:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
This seems rather redundant when we already have Category:Star Ships. --[[User:Dragonclaws|Dragonclaws]] 02:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
:I created this because I felt that that category is a disaster, no offense intended. This will be a centralized core of starship information, by race (human or the joint races of the Covenant, classification (Marathon-class Cruiser, etc...), and will provide basic info for everyy ship. Thanks. Cheers, '''[[User:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="red">Relentless</font>]][[User talk:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="blue">Recusant</font>]] | |||
I think this is nicly laid out --[[User:Climax Viod|Climax Viod]] 21:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC) | I think this is nicly laid out --[[User:Climax Viod|Climax Viod]] 21:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
Line 11: | Line 8: | ||
All UNSC APOC FFG Missile Frigates have 3 Shiva Tactical Nuclear Missile Launchers --[[User:DarkAngel|DarkAngel]] 12:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC) | All UNSC APOC FFG Missile Frigates have 3 Shiva Tactical Nuclear Missile Launchers --[[User:DarkAngel|DarkAngel]] 12:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
== | == Halyon class == | ||
I added the description, may need some clean up, btw Halo needs to be added to Destroyed on Pillar of autumn. Also an article should be added to describe the armor of a halyon class ship, it is useful. I might make it at around 6 EST. -[[User:Lt.O'Brien|Lt.O'Brien]] 22:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC) | I added the description, may need some clean up, btw Halo needs to be added to Destroyed on Pillar of autumn. Also an article should be added to describe the armor of a halyon class ship, it is useful. I might make it at around 6 EST. -[[User:Lt.O'Brien|Lt.O'Brien]] 22:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
Line 19: | Line 16: | ||
The Halcyon summary seems somewhat confusing as it mixes the original Halycon and the refit, giving the impression this class is fairly useless. That is correct for the original but the refit made this class significantly more combat capable. I think the first paragraph should refer to the Halcyon-class ships in their original status (not very combat capable) and then the second paragrah should address the refitted version mentioning its honeycomb armour structure for the refit and focussing on its MAC's ability to fire three rounds per charge and the high speed overburn of the engines --[[User:Johnmcl7|Johnmcl7]] 03:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC) | The Halcyon summary seems somewhat confusing as it mixes the original Halycon and the refit, giving the impression this class is fairly useless. That is correct for the original but the refit made this class significantly more combat capable. I think the first paragraph should refer to the Halcyon-class ships in their original status (not very combat capable) and then the second paragrah should address the refitted version mentioning its honeycomb armour structure for the refit and focussing on its MAC's ability to fire three rounds per charge and the high speed overburn of the engines --[[User:Johnmcl7|Johnmcl7]] 03:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Ship | == Ship weapons == | ||
Guys i know that you are completly deidicated to canon, even tho the ships in FLCE are designed on how books etc describe them they arent correct to every last detail. However all the weapons and the amount each ship can carry could problerly be asked for off Sully, the mods designer, and these are correct. -- [[User:DarkAngel|DarkAngel]] 16:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC). | Guys i know that you are completly deidicated to canon, even tho the ships in FLCE are designed on how books etc describe them they arent correct to every last detail. However all the weapons and the amount each ship can carry could problerly be asked for off Sully, the mods designer, and these are correct. -- [[User:DarkAngel|DarkAngel]] 16:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC). | ||
== Complete Ship | == Complete Ship list == | ||
Im am currently on a project to list all Covenant and UNSC ships. --[[User:DarkAngel|DarkAngel]] 12:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC) | Im am currently on a project to list all Covenant and UNSC ships. --[[User:DarkAngel|DarkAngel]] 12:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
Line 30: | Line 27: | ||
:In TFoR, it is referred to as a specific ship, the ship that John's team hides aboard to get into the Eridanus Secundus asteroid base. In FS, it is suddenly and inexplicably the name for a class of ship, the ''Laden''-class freighter. Probably an oversight on Nylund's part. -[[User:Azathoth|Azathoth]] 15:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC) | :In TFoR, it is referred to as a specific ship, the ship that John's team hides aboard to get into the Eridanus Secundus asteroid base. In FS, it is suddenly and inexplicably the name for a class of ship, the ''Laden''-class freighter. Probably an oversight on Nylund's part. -[[User:Azathoth|Azathoth]] 15:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
This might be of help [[http:// | This might be of help [[http://halo.wikia.com/wiki/Letter_-_Re:Parabola%2C_Laden%2C_and_Station_Jefferson| Letters of Canon]][[User:Raptor117|Raptor117]] 00:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
==What | ==What th?== | ||
How Come there is 2 titles saying carrier? | How Come there is 2 titles saying carrier? | ||
Line 63: | Line 60: | ||
Should In Amber Clad be listed as destroyed; as a far I know High Charity and so to I.A.C. should still be intact. I think Unoperational would be a better status. RSVP. [[User:Fork|Fork]] 00:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC) | Should In Amber Clad be listed as destroyed; as a far I know High Charity and so to I.A.C. should still be intact. I think Unoperational would be a better status. RSVP. [[User:Fork|Fork]] 00:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Meh Starship page! == | |||
== | |||
I was working on cleaning this up a while back, and forgot about it... but anyway, it's at User:Guesty-Persony-Thingy/List of Starships, and IMO it's better, because it doesn't have info about different ship classes, and it's just a list, as the name says. Should we change it to be like that, or something else? [[User:24.251.106.233|24.251.106.233]] 04:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | I was working on cleaning this up a while back, and forgot about it... but anyway, it's at User:Guesty-Persony-Thingy/List of Starships, and IMO it's better, because it doesn't have info about different ship classes, and it's just a list, as the name says. Should we change it to be like that, or something else? [[User:24.251.106.233|24.251.106.233]] 04:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
Line 73: | Line 68: | ||
No offensive to the guys who want to keep this page, but we REALLY need a new improvement drive!!! This one has been up ever since my memory can remember. What else is there to fix? It's also hard to get promoted in the COH and UNSCOH when there is nothing to majorly improve. [[User:Fork|Fork]] 22:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | No offensive to the guys who want to keep this page, but we REALLY need a new improvement drive!!! This one has been up ever since my memory can remember. What else is there to fix? It's also hard to get promoted in the COH and UNSCOH when there is nothing to majorly improve. [[User:Fork|Fork]] 22:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Umm... there's a reason the CoH and UoH have their own improvement articles... '''[[ | :Umm... there's a reason the CoH and UoH have their own improvement articles... '''[[w:c:halo:User:Guesty-Persony-Thingy|<font color="#000000">G</font><font color="#770000"><sup>ü</sup></font><font color="#cc0000">é</font><font color="#ff0000"><sub>ß</sub></font><font color="#ff3333">Ł</font><font color="#ff6666"><sup>¥</sup></font>]]-[[w:c:halo:User talk:Guesty-Persony-Thingy|<font color="#9999ff">∏</font><font color="#6666ff"><sub>é</sub></font><font color="#3333ff">Ґ</font><font color="#0000ff"><sup>∫</sup></font><font color="#0000cc">ø</font><font color="#000066"><sub>ñ</sub></font><font color="#000000">¥</font>]]-[[Special:Contributions/Guesty-Persony-Thingy|<font color="#000000"><sup>†</sup></font><font color="#007700">ħ</font><font color="#00cc00"><sub>î</sub></font><font color="#00ff00">И</font><font color="#44ff44"><sup>g</sup></font><font color="#99ff99">¥</font>]]''' 22:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | ||