Editing Talk:Jeht 'Lcmutee
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
There isn't much known about this Arbiter who was responsible for the Taming of the Hunters, and much of the content in this article are reworded information from the Taming of the Hunters. As a result, there isn't much value of giving this Arbiter its own article since there is nothing much that can be added or expanded, and I doubt this article will ever receive any foreseeable expansion. It seems that the only reason why this Arbiter was given an article was simply because he was a notable person known for an event. While I do not contest the issue of notability, I would say that it is pretty much a trivial article since, as I said before, there is not much value for readers. As per our policy, "a content shall be deemed worthy of having its own article". However, just because it is notable does not mean that an article should be created as this is merely up to the editors. For such reasons, I think it is better to just remove this article from the wiki.— <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 14:19, 18 June 2014 (EDT) | There isn't much known about this Arbiter who was responsible for the Taming of the Hunters, and much of the content in this article are reworded information from the Taming of the Hunters. As a result, there isn't much value of giving this Arbiter its own article since there is nothing much that can be added or expanded, and I doubt this article will ever receive any foreseeable expansion. It seems that the only reason why this Arbiter was given an article was simply because he was a notable person known for an event. While I do not contest the issue of notability, I would say that it is pretty much a trivial article since, as I said before, there is not much value for readers. As per our policy, "a content shall be deemed worthy of having its own article". However, just because it is notable does not mean that an article should be created as this is merely up to the editors. For such reasons, I think it is better to just remove this article from the wiki.— <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 14:19, 18 June 2014 (EDT) | ||
:I'm a bit on the fence, though I'm generally leaning toward keeping it. It's true that most of the info can be found in other articles, but a specific page can act as an aggregate to have that disparate info in one place. And at the end of the day, what's the harm in having this page? I'm seeing there seems to be a general aversion going on as to the notability of unidentified characters - would we be having this discussion if we knew this Arbiter's name? --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 12:57, 19 June 2014 (EDT) | :I'm a bit on the fence, though I'm generally leaning toward keeping it. It's true that most of the info can be found in other articles, but a specific page can act as an aggregate to have that disparate info in one place. And at the end of the day, what's the harm in having this page? I'm seeing there seems to be a general aversion going on as to the notability of unidentified characters - would we be having this discussion if we knew this Arbiter's name? --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 12:57, 19 June 2014 (EDT) | ||