| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==Untitled==
| |
| This is like Star Wars VI in that it is an unfinished superweapon capable of firing. | | This is like Star Wars VI in that it is an unfinished superweapon capable of firing. |
|
| |
|
| Line 16: |
Line 15: |
| :That same question came up on the original 04 page and they decided were against it, if I memory right --[[User:MCDBBlits|MCDBBlits]] 22:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC) | | :That same question came up on the original 04 page and they decided were against it, if I memory right --[[User:MCDBBlits|MCDBBlits]] 22:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| ::They are two different distinct Halos, thus two different articles. --<b>[[User:ED|<font color="black">E</font>]][[User talk:ED|<font color="black">D</font>]]File:ArmyROTC.gif|15px]]</b> 06:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC) | | ::They are two different distinct Halos, thus two different articles. --<b>[[User:ED|<font color="black">E</font>]][[User talk:ED|<font color="black">D</font>]][[Image:ArmyROTC.gif|15px]]</b> 06:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| ==Probable taken time== | | ==Probable taken time== |
| Isn't that a speculation? [[User:Master Chief Petty Officer|<font color="Silver">Master</font><font color="DarkGray">Chief</font>'''<font color="Gray">Petty</font><font color="DimGray">Officer</font>''']]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Master Chief Petty Officer|<font color="RoyalBlue">Spartan Contribution</font>]]</sub> 13:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC) | | Isn't that a speculation? [[User:Master Chief Petty Officer|'''<font color="Silver">'''Master'''</font><font color="DarkGray">'''Chief'''</font><font color="Gray">Petty</font><font color="DimGray">Officer</font>''']]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Master Chief Petty Officer|<font color="RoyalBlue">Spartan Contribution</font>]]</sub> 13:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| Indeed it is but I though it was useful and overlooked, that people don't really know anything about. I mean we all know what installations do, the environment and stuff like that, but we don't know the time taken to do this in, (you could say that is speculation what the environment on each ring is like) --[[User:Megidra|Megidra]] 22:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | | Indeed it is but I though it was useful and overlooked, that people don't really know anything about. I mean we all know what installations do, the environment and stuff like that, but we don't know the time taken to do this in, (you could say that is speculation what the environment on each ring is like) --[[User:Megidra|Megidra]] 22:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC) |
| Line 25: |
Line 24: |
| == 343 Rampancy == | | == 343 Rampancy == |
|
| |
|
| I think we can remove the speculation of 343 being programed to protect the installation above all else. If the forerunners decided to use a last ditch galactic annihilation approach its safe to presume they value containing flood over protecting their installations as evidenced by the Ark's programing to build more in the event of one's demise. | | I think we can remove the speculation of 343 being programed to protect the installation above all else. If the forerunners decided to use a last ditch galactic annihilation approach its safe to presume they value containing flood over protecting their installations as evidenced by the Ark's programing to build more in the event of one's demise. |
|
| |
|
| But the Ark was put in danger, without it no new Halos could be built. Also, you need to sign your posts. [[User:Smothmoth|Smothmoth]] 22:55, 3 May 2008 (UTC) | | But the Ark was put in danger, without it no new Halos could be built. Also, you need to sign your posts. [[User:Smothmoth|Smothmoth]] 22:55, 3 May 2008 (UTC) |
| Line 33: |
Line 32: |
| is why it was out of range of the other instilations. why would it be made that way? | | is why it was out of range of the other instilations. why would it be made that way? |
|
| |
|
| It would likely be sent through slipspace to it's predicesor's location, and was built outside of the galaxy becouse that's where the Ark is. [[User:24.144.151.36|24.144.151.36]] 05:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC) | | It would likely be sent through slipspace to it's predicesor's location, and was built outside of the galaxy becouse that's where the Ark is. [[User:24.144.151.36|24.144.151.36]] 05:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| == Other Replacement Halos? == | | == Other Replacement Halos? == |
| Line 40: |
Line 39: |
|
| |
|
| Also, here is further evidence. On Avalanche, the Ark and the Milky Way are missing, possibly meaning the Ark repaired itself, made another replacement, and sent it away back into the galaxy when the replacement was able to complete itself. That means that the Ark probably would already have pre-prepared designs in it, because otherwise it would probably look even more different every new copy. [[User talk:HaloArray|HaloArray]] 22:10, September 13, 2009 (UTC) | | Also, here is further evidence. On Avalanche, the Ark and the Milky Way are missing, possibly meaning the Ark repaired itself, made another replacement, and sent it away back into the galaxy when the replacement was able to complete itself. That means that the Ark probably would already have pre-prepared designs in it, because otherwise it would probably look even more different every new copy. [[User talk:HaloArray|HaloArray]] 22:10, September 13, 2009 (UTC) |
|
| |
| ==04 II or 04B==
| |
|
| |
| now, as to my knowledge, the name Installation 04 II has no canon reference, while 04B is used in the [[Halo Encyclopaedia]] the ruling on which is: use, unless there is something before that contradicts, so, if i'm wrong, where is 04B called "04 II?" --[[User talk:WhellerNG|WhellerNG]] 20:28, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :You probably should've used the talk page before instead of undoing edits/moves without explanation. I didn't know the source, as I do not have the Halo Encyclopedia. <b>[[User:Smoke.|<span style="color:Gray; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Smoke</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Smoke.|<span style="color:Gray; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Sound off!</span>]]</sup></b> 21:18, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :: I'm sorry, I thought the fact I cited the source was enough--[[User talk:WhellerNG|WhellerNG]] 21:46, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ::: Actual, in conventional naming, Installation 04A would refer to the second, B would be a third. NCC-1701-A USS Enterprise was the replacement to NCC-1701 USS Enterprise. If a house was separated, you'd get 1. Church lane and 1A. Church lane. The Simpson's had an ''Area 51A'' Airforce base.-- '''[[User:Forerunner|<font color="blue">Fore</font>]]''[[User talk:Forerunner|<font color="green">run</font>]]''[[Special:Contributions/Forerunner|<font color="red">ner</font>]]''' 22:43, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ==What?==
| |
|
| |
| In the article it says "The ring was also not connected to the other Installations, allowing a tactical pulse to be fired without triggering the other 6 Installations. It is never revealed if this is an option available to completed installations as well although it is likely the second Installation 04 merely had not been set up with this network yet, as it was incomplete; a logical precaution considering the effects of a misfire." But you learn in Halo 2 that all the Halo rings CAN be fired together but only from the ark, meaning that they don't all fire if only one is activated. The mentioned paragraph needs to be removed as it's not a characteristic of the unfinished ring, it's just how the halo network works. [[Special:Contributions/92.238.202.23|92.238.202.23]] 12:31, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ==Status==
| |
| The picture displaying the hologram of Installation 4...is this Installation 4, or 4B? I thought it was 4, and had red parts to indicate it was out of commission (aka destroyed), but then again, the red parts could mean incomplete areas of 4B. <small><span style="border: 2px solid black; -moz-border-radius:24px">[[User:orionf22|'''<span style="background-color:#787878; color:white; -moz-border-radius-topleft:24px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:24px"> ΘяɪɸɴF22 </span>''']][http://halopedian.com/User:orionf22<span style="background-color:#787878; color:firebrick; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:24px; -moz-border-radius-topright:24px"> Me </span>][[User talk:orionf22|<span style="background-color:#787878; color:firebrick; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:24px; -moz-border-radius-topleft:24px"> Talk </span>]][[Special:Contributions/orionf22|<span style="background-color:#787878; color:firebrick"> Contributions </span>]][http://xfire.com/clans/coag<span style="background-color:#787878; color:gold; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:24px; -moz-border-radius-topright:24px"> <b>CAG</b> </span>]</span></small> 15:12, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :It is very/most likely that it is the hologram of Installation 04B.- <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Subtank|<font color="gold"><font color="#FF4F00">5</font>əb<font color="#FF4F00">'7</font>aŋk</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Subtank|<font color="#FF4F00">7alk</font>]])</sup></font> 15:15, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ==Why the hell doesnt raid on installation 04b have its own article==
| |
|
| |
| Basically what the title says, if raid on high charity can have its own article, why is there a title saying raid on installation 04b that only leads to installation 04b and not the battle itself why? --[[User talk:CookieMonstersayshello|CookieMonstersayshello]] 06:54, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| I think that everyone agrees there should be, just everybody's too lazy (or just haven't gotten) to write it. If you want it so badly, then go ahead! Write it. I don't know man, but it keeps me up at night. [[User:Vegerot|<span style="color:midnightblue; font-weight:bold">Vegerot</span>]] ([[User talk:Vegerot|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]]) 13:03, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| I will. --[[User talk:CookieMonstersayshello|CookieMonstersayshello]] 07:46, 6 August 2011 (EDT) I tried, its not very good but its a start. --[[User talk:CookieMonstersayshello|CookieMonstersayshello]] 08:02, 6 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Monitor ==
| |
| CookieMonster's edit just got me thinking. Is 343 Guilty Spark the "official" monitor of Installation 04B? The second 04 clearly uses the same codes as the original, as 343 can still operate it. But think about it. First of all, if 343 Guilty Spark didn't somehow contact the Ark before the replacement was built, then wouldn't Installation 00 have assumed that he was destroyed, and have made a new one. Second, when Spark was chatting with the Monitor of the Ark, the Monitor (or whatever thing was warning Spark) there made no mention what-so-ever of the new Halo. Meaning three things, either 1. Spark was talking to another sub-routine of the Monitor, which had nothing to do with Installation 04B, so that part of the Monitor wouldn't have told him. Or 2. It was never '''planning''' on telling him about it, because it had already (or in the process of) created a new Monitor for the installation. Or the third possibility, for some reason or another, 343 Guilty Spark was not '''ALLOWED''' to be the Monitor of an installation again, maybe it had to do with the fact that that Monitor didn't think Spark was "mature" enough to handle another installation, or thought that since he lost one installation he would probably lose another. Or, maybe it was pre-programed for the Monitor of the Ark that when constructing a replacement Halo that "when making a new Halo, there must ALWAYS be a new Monitor to go with it, no old monitors allowed." Possible because: A. The Forerunners thought if one managed to get destroyed, it should have a new monitor, because the old Monitor would probably lose it again. Or, to minimize the chance that the old monitor was "compromised" by the Gravemind (actually, now that I think about it, this actually makes a lot of sense). Wait, but also, after reading about how much, "personality" each monitor had (from the adjunct of Halo: The Flood and the new Halo Terminals). It seems as though monitors of that caliber would be hard to build, don't you think? But also, the Ark is probably one of the most advanced things made by the Forerunners, so it may have had the capability to just spit them out on a conveyor belt or something.
| |
|
| |
| Guys, this all came to me in a matter of minuets after reading that one post (to think, one question mark inspired all this). So if I think of some more, I'll be sure to add it. I don't know man, but it keeps me up at night. [[User:Vegerot|<span style="color:midnightblue; font-weight:bold">Vegerot</span>]] ([[User talk:Vegerot|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]]) 13:27, 5 August 2011 (EDT)!!!
| |
|
| |
| :I'd say that he assumed ''de facto'' caretakership of the ring. While he wasn't created got that ring, he still assumed responsibility for it - if the 04B ring had its own monitor up and running, we should have seen it in the rontrol room - both 343 and 2401 seen to have been designed to automatically associated reclaimers with the superweapon.-- '''[[User:Forerunner|<font color="blue">Fore</font>]]''[[User talk:Forerunner|<font color="green">run</font>]]''[[Special:Contributions/Forerunner|<font color="red">ner</font>]]''''' 14:00, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| I know. But maybe the original Monitor was out and about wondering the Installation, checking to see if there were any problems with it. When '''WHA-BLAM!!''' the whole fucking Installation starts caving in on itself. And true, Spark assumed responsibility for the ring, I could kidnap a kid and accept responsibility for him too, that doesn't mean that when the parents come back they're not gonna throw me in jail. Spark could have said, "OK, this is my installation, I'm gonna run and take care of it just like my original one." But that doesn't mean that he was actually allowed to. And think about that other stuff I said. I don't know man, but it keeps me up at night. [[User:Vegerot|<span style="color:midnightblue; font-weight:bold">Vegerot</span>]] ([[User talk:Vegerot|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]]) 14:09, 5 August 2011 (EDT)!
| |
|
| |
| I put de facto on the end, he may not "officially" been the monitor of installation 04B but as Forerunner said he assumed de facto caretakership of the ring. --[[User talk:CookieMonstersayshello|CookieMonstersayshello]] 03:32, 7 August 2011 (EDT)
| |