Editing Talk:Halo: Reach

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Archived|multi=Archives<br />[[/Archive 1|1]] • [[/Archive 2|2]] • [[/Archive 3|3]]}}<!-- Please do not touch this -->
{{Archived}}<!-- Please do not touch this -->


== Canonholes in Reach ==
== Canonholes in Reach ==
Line 77: Line 77:


::I realise most of the points have been addressed, but I thought I'd add my two cents.
::I realise most of the points have been addressed, but I thought I'd add my two cents.
::#This "MAC in orbit" debate seems a relic of the Halo Wars debates, and my answer is the same here as it is there - the force a kinetic projectile imparts is based on its mass and velocity. It's not inconceivable that the UNSC uses lower-velocity shots that impart enough kinetic energy to smash a Covenant corvette, but not enough to crack the planet's crust apart. Using the full force would be a tremendous waste anyway. At the least, they may have [[halofanon:THOR Weapon System|orbiting kinetic satellites]] for the expressed purpose of reactive orbital bombardment. We know that at least frigate-grade MAC weapons in atmosphere is a big deal, from Jorge's reaction, but why would the UNSC use weapons that produce so much collateral damage, when they need pinpoint precision?
::#This "MAC in orbit" debate seems a relic of the Halo Wars debates, and my answer is the same here as it is there - the force a kinetic projectile imparts is based on its mass and velocity. It's not inconceivable that the UNSC uses lower-velocity shots that impart enough kinetic energy to smash a Covenant corvette, but not enough to crack the planet's crust apart. Using the full force would be a tremendous waste anyway. At the least, they may have [[w:c:halofanon:THOR Weapon System|orbiting kinetic satellites]] for the expressed purpose of reactive orbital bombardment. We know that at least frigate-grade MAC weapons in atmosphere is a big deal, from Jorge's reaction, but why would the UNSC use weapons that produce so much collateral damage, when they need pinpoint precision?
::#We've never seen any conclusive statement that it was only because they were on a Halo. Presumably the Prophets have many ways of protecting themselves - whether they understand the technology fully or not. I understand it to be using slipspace to "shunt" the teleportee to where they need to be, rather than particle disassembly and reassembly ala stereotypical teleportation, and the Covenant have a mastery of slipspace that humanity does not.
::#We've never seen any conclusive statement that it was only because they were on a Halo. Presumably the Prophets have many ways of protecting themselves - whether they understand the technology fully or not. I understand it to be using slipspace to "shunt" the teleportee to where they need to be, rather than particle disassembly and reassembly ala stereotypical teleportation, and the Covenant have a mastery of slipspace that humanity does not.
::#We've seen corvettes camouflage. ''We'' assumed that was the theoretical limit of size a ship could be and camouflaged. Nothing has said that this was true. It contradicts nothing.
::#We've seen corvettes camouflage. ''We'' assumed that was the theoretical limit of size a ship could be and camouflaged. Nothing has said that this was true. It contradicts nothing.
Line 85: Line 85:
::#Who ever said the M392 and the BR55 were even the same series? The DMR is much earlier, and is being replaced by the BR55. That doesn't make it the "test version", it makes it the BR55's predecessor. And notice that Halo Wars and Contact Harvest were based on a ''Marine'' perspective - the Army uses different materiel. The two branches have different requirements, different acquisition methods and aims, so it makes sense that their arsenals differ a little. I'd be surprised if they didn't.
::#Who ever said the M392 and the BR55 were even the same series? The DMR is much earlier, and is being replaced by the BR55. That doesn't make it the "test version", it makes it the BR55's predecessor. And notice that Halo Wars and Contact Harvest were based on a ''Marine'' perspective - the Army uses different materiel. The two branches have different requirements, different acquisition methods and aims, so it makes sense that their arsenals differ a little. I'd be surprised if they didn't.
::#You can't "Break" Canon. You can only add to it. Sometimes you need to modify some bits, clarify others, in the form of retcons, ie the dates of the Fall of Reach. But the only thing that can "break" it would be something major, ie; saying that the Master Chief is a enlisted as a Marine and was made a Spartan later, when we have so many other sources stating otherwise. That's an example of something that completely ignores the canon. Bungie didn't take the Halo Bible and throw it out the window. They looked through it, selected what they wanted to keep, partitioned others that they wanted to modify, and set to work.  
::#You can't "Break" Canon. You can only add to it. Sometimes you need to modify some bits, clarify others, in the form of retcons, ie the dates of the Fall of Reach. But the only thing that can "break" it would be something major, ie; saying that the Master Chief is a enlisted as a Marine and was made a Spartan later, when we have so many other sources stating otherwise. That's an example of something that completely ignores the canon. Bungie didn't take the Halo Bible and throw it out the window. They looked through it, selected what they wanted to keep, partitioned others that they wanted to modify, and set to work.  
::#I'm sorry, but this just seems like a huge overreaction. I'm not blaming you specifically for it, because its one a lot of fans share. But I think [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TheyChangedItNowItSucks TV Tropes] perfectly summarises this kind of thing. -- [[User:Specops306|<b><font color=indigo>Specops306</font></b>]] [[halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>Qur'a 'Morhek</sup></font></i></u>]] 23:51, 4 March 2011 (EST)
::#I'm sorry, but this just seems like a huge overreaction. I'm not blaming you specifically for it, because its one a lot of fans share. But I think [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TheyChangedItNowItSucks TV Tropes] perfectly summarises this kind of thing. -- [[User:Specops306|<b><font color=indigo>Specops306</font></b>]] [[w:c:halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>Qur'a 'Morhek</sup></font></i></u>]] 23:51, 4 March 2011 (EST)


: [[User:Vegerot|<span style="color:midnightblue; font-weight:bold">Vegerot</span>]] ([[User talk:Vegerot|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]])  20:19, 5 March 2011 (EST)While we have pretty much given him a good talking to on the technological portion of this. The big thing that I don't know is the timeline. Like the Pillar of Autumn landing. Or Gamma Station (or wherever they saw the big blob from one of the probes and blew themselves up) knowing about the Covenant yet apparently Noble Team was 1st, and then alerted FLEET COMMAND. Again, I'm not trying to be like Atlas and claim that this isn't canon. I'm just asking.
: [[User:Vegerot|<span style="color:midnightblue; font-weight:bold">Vegerot</span>]] ([[User talk:Vegerot|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]])  20:19, 5 March 2011 (EST)While we have pretty much given him a good talking to on the technological portion of this. The big thing that I don't know is the timeline. Like the Pillar of Autumn landing. Or Gamma Station (or wherever they saw the big blob from one of the probes and blew themselves up) knowing about the Covenant yet apparently Noble Team was 1st, and then alerted FLEET COMMAND. Again, I'm not trying to be like Atlas and claim that this isn't canon. I'm just asking.
Line 91: Line 91:
::Essentially, The Fall of Reach claimed that the planet was invaded in one day (a ridiculous proposition when you think of the logistics that would require), and that the rest of the campaign, well into September, was just guerrilla holdouts and desperate breaks through enemy lines. Reach stretches things out a bit, with a small expeditionary taskforce to pave the way arriving in July, skirmishes around their footholds in Viery, and then the arrival of an entire Covenant fleet, which matches with the FoR's events, retconning it so that these are reinforcements rather than the initial invasion. The Spartans, whose viewpoint we're given, don't know that this is a follow-up effort because they weren't told - their preparations for [[Operation: RED FLAG]] were too important to distract them with details like the battle for their home, and Halsey needed their minds focussed 100% on the mission. As for the Pillar of Autumn, we know that by the time it's cradled on Reach the Master Chief has already been taken back aboard - the cryotube is either him or, I think more likely, Linda. This is a brief stop, the recover part of Cortana, after which they head off to Alpha Halo.
::Essentially, The Fall of Reach claimed that the planet was invaded in one day (a ridiculous proposition when you think of the logistics that would require), and that the rest of the campaign, well into September, was just guerrilla holdouts and desperate breaks through enemy lines. Reach stretches things out a bit, with a small expeditionary taskforce to pave the way arriving in July, skirmishes around their footholds in Viery, and then the arrival of an entire Covenant fleet, which matches with the FoR's events, retconning it so that these are reinforcements rather than the initial invasion. The Spartans, whose viewpoint we're given, don't know that this is a follow-up effort because they weren't told - their preparations for [[Operation: RED FLAG]] were too important to distract them with details like the battle for their home, and Halsey needed their minds focussed 100% on the mission. As for the Pillar of Autumn, we know that by the time it's cradled on Reach the Master Chief has already been taken back aboard - the cryotube is either him or, I think more likely, Linda. This is a brief stop, the recover part of Cortana, after which they head off to Alpha Halo.


::Does that answer everything? -- [[User:Specops306|<b><font color=indigo>Specops306</font></b>]] [[halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>Qur'a 'Morhek</sup></font></i></u>]] 05:09, 6 March 2011 (EST)
::Does that answer everything? -- [[User:Specops306|<b><font color=indigo>Specops306</font></b>]] [[w:c:halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>Qur'a 'Morhek</sup></font></i></u>]] 05:09, 6 March 2011 (EST)


:: [[User:Vegerot|<span style="color:midnightblue; font-weight:bold">Vegerot</span>]] ([[User talk:Vegerot|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]])  12:32, 6 March 2011 (EST): Yeah, the only thing that I don't get now is Cortana. Because I read Dr. Halsey's Journal yet it doesn't make sense. Because if Halsey wanted the PoA to have the full Cortana then they would have had Cortana. If she wanted to keep part of Cortana, then she would have not asked NOBLE to retrieve her. Also, is it right to assume that ONI didn't create the SPARTAN-III variant of MJOLNIR with the Memory-processor superconductor layer, because that was almost half the cost of the armor. Also, Cortana could have just changed herself (as in updating her calculations, like in the Fall of Reach, when she says "in fact, now I have just made it a 98 percent chance") like she did with John-117 to speed SPARTAN-B312's reflexes and provide support in the Battle Field.
:: [[User:Vegerot|<span style="color:midnightblue; font-weight:bold">Vegerot</span>]] ([[User talk:Vegerot|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]])  12:32, 6 March 2011 (EST): Yeah, the only thing that I don't get now is Cortana. Because I read Dr. Halsey's Journal yet it doesn't make sense. Because if Halsey wanted the PoA to have the full Cortana then they would have had Cortana. If she wanted to keep part of Cortana, then she would have not asked NOBLE to retrieve her. Also, is it right to assume that ONI didn't create the SPARTAN-III variant of MJOLNIR with the Memory-processor superconductor layer, because that was almost half the cost of the armor. Also, Cortana could have just changed herself (as in updating her calculations, like in the Fall of Reach, when she says "in fact, now I have just made it a 98 percent chance") like she did with John-117 to speed SPARTAN-B312's reflexes and provide support in the Battle Field.
Line 97: Line 97:
:::Halsey divided Cortana because she needed her to finish archiving the data gathered from the relics under Sword Base. At the same time, Cortana needed to accomodate herself aboard the Pillar of Autumn, a lengthy process. The solution was to split her into two separate halves until Operation: RED FLAG was launched, at which point they would be reunited. The plan needed to be modified, because the unexpected arrival of Covenant reinforcements cut the two halves off from each other, and the results of the Sword Base dig turned out to be more important than anyone could guess, hence the involvement of Noble.
:::Halsey divided Cortana because she needed her to finish archiving the data gathered from the relics under Sword Base. At the same time, Cortana needed to accomodate herself aboard the Pillar of Autumn, a lengthy process. The solution was to split her into two separate halves until Operation: RED FLAG was launched, at which point they would be reunited. The plan needed to be modified, because the unexpected arrival of Covenant reinforcements cut the two halves off from each other, and the results of the Sword Base dig turned out to be more important than anyone could guess, hence the involvement of Noble.


:::And while I don't think it's explicitly stated, I don't think that Noble's MJOLNIR would need the equipment to support a Smart AI, otherwise Six would have uploaded Cortana to his suit rather than carry her in a rather fragile-looking container. It makes sense - that's what much of the cost and effort go into, so removing it would make sense from an economic point of view. Dot is a more primitive construct, and I don't know if she's even carried in combat anyway - I got the impression that she was stored elsewhere, perhaps on the Pelican, and communicating at range. Having ''every'' Spartan equipped with an AI would have been unrealistic - I think the plan was always that only John would carry Cortana. -- [[User:Specops306|<b><font color=indigo>Specops306</font></b>]] [[halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>Qur'a 'Morhek</sup></font></i></u>]] 23:01, 6 March 2011 (EST)
:::And while I don't think it's explicitly stated, I don't think that Noble's MJOLNIR would need the equipment to support a Smart AI, otherwise Six would have uploaded Cortana to his suit rather than carry her in a rather fragile-looking container. It makes sense - that's what much of the cost and effort go into, so removing it would make sense from an economic point of view. Dot is a more primitive construct, and I don't know if she's even carried in combat anyway - I got the impression that she was stored elsewhere, perhaps on the Pelican, and communicating at range. Having ''every'' Spartan equipped with an AI would have been unrealistic - I think the plan was always that only John would carry Cortana. -- [[User:Specops306|<b><font color=indigo>Specops306</font></b>]] [[w:c:halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>Qur'a 'Morhek</sup></font></i></u>]] 23:01, 6 March 2011 (EST)


::I got the impression that Dot was a military AI, not assigned to Noble but rather to the UNSC Army. She seems to reflect the mannerisms of a Dumb AI, and has access to be able to contact cameras and military surveillance equipment all over the planet. She may be attached to Reach instead, but one scene with Jorge implies she doesn't understand Hungarian, which could suggest she's assigned to the Army rather than to Reach (or maybe Jorge was just mumbling!) [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 19:49, 7 March 2011 (EST)
::I got the impression that Dot was a military AI, not assigned to Noble but rather to the UNSC Army. She seems to reflect the mannerisms of a Dumb AI, and has access to be able to contact cameras and military surveillance equipment all over the planet. She may be attached to Reach instead, but one scene with Jorge implies she doesn't understand Hungarian, which could suggest she's assigned to the Army rather than to Reach (or maybe Jorge was just mumbling!) [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 19:49, 7 March 2011 (EST)
Line 167: Line 167:
Many of these points are very viable but the one thing that still eats at me is the size of the Epsilon Eridani fleet. The reason for this is in Halo Reach the fleet is only shown as Savanah, Grafton and 3 or 4 other frigates a few of which are shown as battered and destroyed hulls. Not to mention the fact that the only orbital station shown is Anchor 9 where is the fleet and the SMACs!?--[[User talk:Thehalocodplayer|Thehalocodplayer]] 18:56, 9 March 2012 (EST)
Many of these points are very viable but the one thing that still eats at me is the size of the Epsilon Eridani fleet. The reason for this is in Halo Reach the fleet is only shown as Savanah, Grafton and 3 or 4 other frigates a few of which are shown as battered and destroyed hulls. Not to mention the fact that the only orbital station shown is Anchor 9 where is the fleet and the SMACs!?--[[User talk:Thehalocodplayer|Thehalocodplayer]] 18:56, 9 March 2012 (EST)


:You're basing your opinion on a very small sampling. You only ''see'' a few frigates and a space station in the game. That doesn't mean the rest of the fleet wasn't out there engaging the Covenant, only that Noble's activities were a sideshow to the much larger picture. -- [[User:Specops306|<b><font color=indigo>Specops306</font></b>]] [[halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>Qur'a 'Morhek</sup></font></i></u>]] 08:34, 17 March 2012 (EDT)
:You're basing your opinion on a very small sampling. You only ''see'' a few frigates and a space station in the game. That doesn't mean the rest of the fleet wasn't out there engaging the Covenant, only that Noble's activities were a sideshow to the much larger picture. -- [[User:Specops306|<b><font color=indigo>Specops306</font></b>]] [[w:c:halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>Qur'a 'Morhek</sup></font></i></u>]] 08:34, 17 March 2012 (EDT)


One of the Data Drops also implies the fleet was being kept on the opposite side of Reach from the battles in Viery, because those leading RED FLAG were trying to lure a Class-Five Covenant ship in. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 13:24, 17 March 2012 (EDT)
One of the Data Drops also implies the fleet was being kept on the opposite side of Reach from the battles in Viery, because those leading RED FLAG were trying to lure a Class-Five Covenant ship in. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 13:24, 17 March 2012 (EDT)
Line 185: Line 185:
::Ahh, thank you very much. I had been looking for ''Halo:Reach ranks'', or ''Halo:Reach ranking system'', and the such. Always putting the '''rank''' keyword before the '''Halo:Reach''' keyword. I will admit that I feel greatly daft right now. However as the saying goes: everyone makes mistakes. ... ... Right? Anyhow, thank you very much, and I'm sorry for bothering you. <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:dbrain64|<nowiki>Feeling daft</nowiki>]] 27th of December, 21:25 (UTC)
::Ahh, thank you very much. I had been looking for ''Halo:Reach ranks'', or ''Halo:Reach ranking system'', and the such. Always putting the '''rank''' keyword before the '''Halo:Reach''' keyword. I will admit that I feel greatly daft right now. However as the saying goes: everyone makes mistakes. ... ... Right? Anyhow, thank you very much, and I'm sorry for bothering you. <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:dbrain64|<nowiki>Feeling daft</nowiki>]] 27th of December, 21:25 (UTC)


That because there's a space in between "Halo:" and " Reach."  Halo: Reach. Vegerot goes RAWR! [[User:Vegerot|<span style="color:midnightblue; font-weight:bold">Vegerot</span>]] ([[User talk:Vegerot|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]])  18:30, 27 December 2011 (EST)!
That because there's a space in between "Halo:" and " Reach."  Halo: Reach. Vegerot goes RAWR! [[File:Icon-Vegito2.gif|21px]] [[User:Vegerot|<span style="color:midnightblue; font-weight:bold">Vegerot</span>]] ([[User talk:Vegerot|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]])  18:30, 27 December 2011 (EST)!


==Super-MACS?==
==Super-MACS?==
Line 193: Line 193:
::If they are not in a defensive sphere, which does seem unlikely, then they must have the ability to move. Otherwise, the main Covenant attack on Reach would have simply have taken place during a blind spot. Therefore, assuming that the SMACs must move, why would valuable and finite grounds assets be committed when the SMACs would eventually be able to move into position? {{Unsigned|Psycho60}}
::If they are not in a defensive sphere, which does seem unlikely, then they must have the ability to move. Otherwise, the main Covenant attack on Reach would have simply have taken place during a blind spot. Therefore, assuming that the SMACs must move, why would valuable and finite grounds assets be committed when the SMACs would eventually be able to move into position? {{Unsigned|Psycho60}}
:::ODP's have never actually been stated to be able to move. They are in a fixed geosynchronous orbit over the planet, as seen by Avery Johnson's comment in ''Halo 2'':  
:::ODP's have never actually been stated to be able to move. They are in a fixed geosynchronous orbit over the planet, as seen by Avery Johnson's comment in ''Halo 2'':  
{{Quote|The ''Cairo'' is one of 300 geosync platforms|Johnson}}.  
{{Quote|The ''Cairo'' is one of 300 geosync platforms|Johnson}}.  
:::Please sign your comments.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}}
:::Please sign your comments.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}}
Line 198: Line 199:
They can move if needed, but by the time they knew, it was too late.  Because it was already in atmosphere. '''[[User:Vegerot|<font color="blue">('''or so it says in the sacred caves''')</font> Vegerot!]]''''' 20:43, 28 February 2012 (EST)!
They can move if needed, but by the time they knew, it was too late.  Because it was already in atmosphere. '''[[User:Vegerot|<font color="blue">('''or so it says in the sacred caves''')</font> Vegerot!]]''''' 20:43, 28 February 2012 (EST)!


By definition, "''geosynchronous''" means that ODPs are constantly moving - the term actually means that they pass over the same place on the ground once every orbit. If they remained in place, they would be ''geostationary'', which they've never been described. On the other hand, we've also had no confirmation that they can move at all ''under their own power''. As such, it may be that the platforms meant for that area had already been destroyed and others wouldn't come into range before the supercarrier could finish offloading enough troops to swarm the generators powering them, or that the Covenant had found a glitch in the orbital pattern that meant none had a line of sight. -- [[User:Specops306|<b><font color=indigo>Specops306</font></b>]] [[halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>Qur'a 'Morhek</sup></font></i></u>]] 22:26, 28 February 2012 (EST)
By definition, "''geosynchronous''" means that ODPs are constantly moving - the term actually means that they pass over the same place on the ground once every orbit. If they remained in place, they would be ''geostationary'', which they've never been described. On the other hand, we've also had no confirmation that they can move at all ''under their own power''. As such, it may be that the platforms meant for that area had already been destroyed and others wouldn't come into range before the supercarrier could finish offloading enough troops to swarm the generators powering them, or that the Covenant had found a glitch in the orbital pattern that meant none had a line of sight. -- [[User:Specops306|<b><font color=indigo>Specops306</font></b>]] [[w:c:halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>Qur'a 'Morhek</sup></font></i></u>]] 22:26, 28 February 2012 (EST)


Even after some guns were destroyed in FoR. The other guns were still able to turn and target. They were even able to target ships that had used precision slipspace jumps to get in close. And wouldnt destroying a SMAC draw more attention to an assault that was supposed to be a suprise? And if none of the SMACS were destoryed, why would the UNSC allow for a blindspot on their second most important planet? [[User talk:Psycho60|Psycho60]] 14:27, 8 March 2012 (EST)
Even after some guns were destroyed in FoR. The other guns were still able to turn and target. They were even able to target ships that had used precision slipspace jumps to get in close. And wouldnt destroying a SMAC draw more attention to an assault that was supposed to be a suprise? And if none of the SMACS were destoryed, why would the UNSC allow for a blindspot on their second most important planet? [[User talk:Psycho60|Psycho60]] 14:27, 8 March 2012 (EST)
Line 206: Line 207:


Besides, would an SMAC really do all that much to a 27 kilometer meter long ship? [[User talk:Phalanx Actual|Phalanx Actual]] 18:41, 29 July 2012 (EDT)
Besides, would an SMAC really do all that much to a 27 kilometer meter long ship? [[User talk:Phalanx Actual|Phalanx Actual]] 18:41, 29 July 2012 (EDT)
== Hair length ==
Why do the female soldiers have hair descending from their helmets? They're not civilian supermodels, they're infantry. Logically they'd have their hair cut short or in some kinda bun, braid, etc.

Please note that all contributions to Halopedia are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see Halopedia:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

To view or search uploaded images go to the list of images. Uploads and deletions are also logged in the upload log. For help including images on a page see Help:Images. For a sound file, use this code: [[Media:File.ogg]].

Do not copy text from other websites without permission. It will be deleted.