You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with
other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 70: |
Line 70: |
|
| |
|
| :Agreed. Should the megablock images of the variants be used for each article main image (at least for now)?--'''''[[User:Killamin7i|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Arial;">Killamin</span><span style="color:red; font-family: Arial;">7</span><span style="color:black; font-family: Arial;">i</span>]]''''' [[User talk:Killamin7i|<font color="Gray">///</font>]] 10:01, 10 March 2015 (EDT) | | :Agreed. Should the megablock images of the variants be used for each article main image (at least for now)?--'''''[[User:Killamin7i|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Arial;">Killamin</span><span style="color:red; font-family: Arial;">7</span><span style="color:black; font-family: Arial;">i</span>]]''''' [[User talk:Killamin7i|<font color="Gray">///</font>]] 10:01, 10 March 2015 (EDT) |
|
| |
| ::My vote is for '''Mark III Cyclops''', pretty much the same set up as [[Mark IX Mantis ADS]]. Also I'm not sure if each variant really warrants a new article.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 15:18, 10 March 2015 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| :::I agree with '''Mark III Cyclops'''. And I don't think each variant should get its own article, similar to what we did with the Warthog article and its variants. - [[User:NightHammer|NightHammer]] ([[User talk:NightHammer|talk]]) 15:29, 10 March 2015 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ::::I also felt it needed to be renamed. Mark III Cyclops sounds good. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 18:17, 10 March 2015 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| :::::I'll make it so.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 18:54, 10 March 2015 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| :"Mark III Cyclops" is a little misleading, however, as it suggests the vehicle in question is the third model of the "Cyclops" line when that's just the name for the HRUNTING Mark III exoskeleton (the preceding suits weren't supposedly called Cyclops). Same with the "Mark IX Mantis" title. I'd rather have gone with HRUNTING Mark III Cyclops (indicating it's "Mark III" of the HRUNTING, not Cyclops, series) or just Cyclops; if we're going for brevity the "Mark III" feels extraneous. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 00:36, 11 March 2015 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ::If we renamed it HRUNTING Mark III Cyclops would you also want to rename the Mark IX Mantis ADS page?[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 00:41, 11 March 2015 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| :::Yeah, based on the same reasoning (vehicles in the HRUNTING/YGGDRASIL series other than the "IX" model weren't called Mantis). I'd be fine with just "Cyclops" and "Mantis" as titles, but I suppose it's best to include the HRUNTING/YGGDRASIL stuff for the sake of consistency. Hence we'd get '''HRUNTING Mark III Cyclops''' and '''HRUNTING/YGGDRASIL Mark IX Mantis'''. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 02:11, 11 March 2015 (EDT)
| |