Editing Talk:Glitches

== Matortheeternal ==
:''This conversation is more relevant to the page than the user, I think, which is why I have opted to put it on a talk page rather than use his UserTalk or social profile comments.''
Matortheeternal, I have added the appropriate Citation Needed notices to your edit. You failed to [[Help:References|cite any sources]], opting only to add an all-caps HTML comment saying how your edit should not be removed as you're "an expert in the field of glitches in ''Halo: Combat Evolved''". (By the way, all-caps is unprofessional and [[Wiktionary:unbecoming|unbecoming]] an expert in nearly any field.)

I don't mean to sound antagonistic, but by what standards are you an "expert"? What is the definition of the word "expert" as it relates to what I like to call glitchology? What are the qualifications? Have you demonstrated an above-average knowledge of glitches? I do not mean to sound hostile; I am merely trying to point out that a wikieditor's declaration of their own expertise is nowhere near as reliable as a cited source.

So if you can find a website that documents at least seven thousand glitches in ''Halo: Combat Evolved'' ''and'' at least four hundred glitches in Blood Gulch, then by all means, add the appropriate REF tags and remove the <code><nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki></code> template codes. Until then, the edit ''must'' continue to be marked with "citation needed", assuming that other editors don't opt to delete it entirely.

Also, to counter an anticipated response, I am aware that Halopedia has more relaxed standards for when and where sources are required; this is because many video game concepts, such as the natures of particular glitches as well as terminology such as [[lag]], [[Betrayal|teamkilling]], etc., are not formally documented in a source that can be reliably cited. However, ''exact'' details (such as, say, an attempted approximation of the number of glitches in a particular aspect of a game) can and should be held to a somewhat elevated standard. <span style="background:#AADDAA;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><b>File:DavidJCobb_Emblem.svg|16px]] [[User:DavidJCobb|<span style="color:#000;position:relative;top:.15em">DavidJCobb&nbsp;</span>]]</b></span> 20:04, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

So how would I go about proving that I am an expert and how would I go about documenting 400 stunts on blood gulch.  And even more extensively, how would I go about proving that my estimate is correct?  I forsaw this discussion or just plain out deletion of my comment.  Perhaps I shouldn't have made it, but I was thoroughly enflamed by the fact that this article said that there were "not very many" glitches in halo combat evolved.  From my expierence, halo: combat evolved has had more glitches then any other game.  I will happily show/send videos of glitches to your hearts content.  I have been glitching in halo: combat evolved for over 3 years now, and I know what I am talking about.  Please, tell me how I can provide references for my figures.  I will be releasing a movie within the next few weeks which is a complete tutorial for 400 stunts on blood gulch.  And I am currently coordinating the halo: combat evolved glitching community into an organized state so we can begin the documentation of the thousands of glitches present in the game.  I am currently working on my own wiki for glitches in halo: combat evolved.  Reason being that I could not effectively work on documenting them on halopedia because of people who doubted my expierence.  I am sure that some people will not allow the references needed tag to be removed untill I have over 7000 stunts documented on the new wiki, stuntopedia.  But hopefully I can convince halopedians to allow me to add my knowledge of glitchology (we call it stunting in h1...) to halopedia.  Good day...  [[User talk:Matortheeternal|Matortheeternal]] 21:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

==Glitch on "The Library" in HCEA==

Just was playing through the level "The Library" in HCEA, and in one section towards the end of the level, there is a wall that is not a solid object, and as such the player can step through the wall and view other parts of the Library. Or at least, it was so for me. I was battling Flood combat and carrier forms, and backed up and through the wall, which was very weird and unexpected. Has this happened to anyone else before, besides me? If so, then a section should be made in the article to account for this, or even a template list of glitches in HCEA. This is just one of what I believe there to be many if one was to do some research online and find even more HCEA glitches, or at least one can hope, or something. Definitely should be noted, one way or another. Oh, and it was on "Easy" difficulty. Don't know about Normal or higher difficulties. I'd like for some others to verify that this glitch exists, and not an isolated coincidence. --'''''[[User:Xamikaze330|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Halo;">Xamikaze330</span>]]''''' <small>['''''[[User talk:Xamikaze330|<font color="Blue">Transmission</font>]]'''''|'''''[[Special:Contributions/Xamikaze330|<font color="Green">Commencing</font>]]''''']</small> 13:22, 14 February 2014 (EST)Xamikaze330
:Forgot to mention that the glitch is encountered in the remastered graphics Campaign, but not present on Classic, as there is supposed to be an alcove with a hidden rocket launcher along with two dead Flood Combat Forms, which there was. Glitch explained. Question is, should it be considered a glitch for HCEA, or not? --'''''[[User:Xamikaze330|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Halo;">Xamikaze330</span>]]''''' <small>['''''[[User talk:Xamikaze330|<font color="Blue">Transmission</font>]]'''''|'''''[[Special:Contributions/Xamikaze330|<font color="Green">Commencing</font>]]''''']</small> 13:28, 14 February 2014 (EST)Xamikaze330

== UST ==

So, that video I was talking about back in 2009 to prove my figures.  Yeah, I finally finished it.  [http://bgmovie.yolasite.com UST Official Website].  Can we get this fixed now?  [[User:Matortheeternal|Matortheeternal]] ([[User talk:Matortheeternal|talk]]) 19:42, 7 August 2014 (EDT)