Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 19: |
Line 19: |
|
| |
|
| :::::This is no different than multiplayer being "canon". Yes, when you go in you are told you are the first recruits to enter this ship.[[User:TheEld|TheEld]] ([[User talk:TheEld|talk]]) 18:34, August 6, 2019 (EDT)TheEld | | :::::This is no different than multiplayer being "canon". Yes, when you go in you are told you are the first recruits to enter this ship.[[User:TheEld|TheEld]] ([[User talk:TheEld|talk]]) 18:34, August 6, 2019 (EDT)TheEld |
|
| |
| ::::::If you and a group of friends are playing multiplayer though, you're a bunch of Spartans: friends sitting on a couch with dew and doritos aren't canon characters.(Even multiplayer is iffy as we don't add Spartan characters that people create, to the wiki as canon characters, nor the games/events they play.)
| |
|
| |
| ::::::At outpost discovery you're literally you in real life, that's the difference and where the question of "where do we draw the line" arises.[[User:Editorguy|Editorguy]] ([[User talk:Editorguy|talk]]) 19:10, August 13, 2019 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| [Indent reset] You're making false equivalences. This is a specific story being told, and would be better applicable to what Fireteam Crimson and Spartan Ops is. No, *your* spartan crimson isn't the person in the event, but the event itself is canon. As with anything, you have to give Outpost a high degree of abstraction anyway - it's unlikely the in-universe hall of history would literally have a real Infection Form or Index in a simple piece of glass, or that the "pelican experience" is just people sat in a room. If 343 set a story that says in XYZ specific war games match, your spartan did A, B and C those events would be very much canon - in the same way, this event is in the sense that there was a Covenant AI at one of the events and Gabriela helped shut it down.[[User:BaconShelf|BaconShelf]] ([[User talk:BaconShelf|talk]]) 20:00, August 13, 2019 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Name == | | == Name == |
Line 32: |
Line 26: |
| ::This page has been made for the AI and [[Gabriela Castaneda]] now exists for the admiral.[[User:BaconShelf|BaconShelf]] ([[User talk:BaconShelf|talk]]) 10:05, August 6, 2019 (EDT) | | ::This page has been made for the AI and [[Gabriela Castaneda]] now exists for the admiral.[[User:BaconShelf|BaconShelf]] ([[User talk:BaconShelf|talk]]) 10:05, August 6, 2019 (EDT) |
| :::No specific rank, no, just "Admiral". I'll get the image I took at Outpost to CIA this week for use as an official source.[[User:Toa Freak|Toa Freak]] ([[User talk:Toa Freak|talk]]) 18:01, August 8, 2019 (EDT) | | :::No specific rank, no, just "Admiral". I'll get the image I took at Outpost to CIA this week for use as an official source.[[User:Toa Freak|Toa Freak]] ([[User talk:Toa Freak|talk]]) 18:01, August 8, 2019 (EDT) |
| ::::That's great, thanks a lot! [[User:BaconShelf|BaconShelf]] ([[User talk:BaconShelf|talk]]) 19:06, August 8, 2019 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Smart or not? ==
| |
|
| |
| Has it been confirmed whether Gabriela is a Smart AI or not? I recall that when I added that detail to the Lone Wolf related article(s) I did, that detail was edited out because at least at that point it hadn't been confirmed, but this page has it there, and I was curious as to what the source was, if that's the case, since at the end of the sentence the two source links are for Lone Wolf #3 & #4, which don't confirm it. If there is a source, I'd be happy to go back through and add it to the other articles she's mentioned in, for the sake of consistency, or otherwise remove it from this page. [[User:Corey-067|Corey-067]] ([[User talk:Corey-067|talk]]) 21:13, August 13, 2019 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| [[Gabriela Castaneda]][[User:TheEld|TheEld]] ([[User talk:TheEld|talk]]) 21:18, August 13, 2019 (EDT)TheEld2
| |
|
| |
| Thank you. I was in the process of deleting my question because I realised it'd already been answered indirectly in other places when you answered. Appreciate the help. [[User:Corey-067|Corey-067]] ([[User talk:Corey-067|talk]]) 21:22, August 13, 2019 (EDT)
| |