You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with
other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 6: |
Line 6: |
|
| |
|
| The Rank of Field Master seems similer to the British rank of Field Marshal which is obove General, the American equivelent is General of the Army --[[User:Climax Viod|Climax Viod]] 18:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC) | | The Rank of Field Master seems similer to the British rank of Field Marshal which is obove General, the American equivelent is General of the Army --[[User:Climax Viod|Climax Viod]] 18:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Field Master appears to be an office/position, not an actual rank (much like how brigade commander is the office but Colonel or Brigadier General is the actual rank). [[User:Idolo|Idolo]] 01:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| It may be possible that, after the great schism, Zealot ranks can be distinguished by armour type. Field Master would lead assaults so might wear gold coloured assault armour etc. This is only an idea.-- [[User:Joshua 029|Joshua 029]] 19:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Merge with Field Marshall ==
| |
|
| |
| Should we merge this page with Field Marshall? They share nearly identical names, and are both classes of Zealot, so isn't it safe to assume they're the same?[[User talk:SPARTAN-347|SPARTAN-347]] 04:09, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| I disagree Field Marshall seems to be a actual rank unlike field master which seems to be a job [[User talk:Admiralmorris|Admiralmorris]] 18:54, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
| |