| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==Fixes==
| |
| Things that need to be fixed:
| |
| 1. <s>4 sides in the battle - MC not included in table</s>
| |
| 2. <s>No mention of end result (Truth escape, Tartarus escape, MC escape, Gravemind victory, etc)</s>
| |
| 3. <s>Extension in general</s>
| |
| --[[User:206.75.46.254|206.75.46.254]] 19:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :Now it just needs a cleanup. --[[User:Forgottenlord|Forgottenlord]] 00:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ==Proposed Name Change==
| |
| Okay, this has been bugging me for a bit, but I do not think this should be called the "First" Battle of High Charity, it should simply be the "Battle of High Charity". The second fight on High Charity in Halo 3 is sometimes referred to as the "Second Battle of High Charity", but I don't think it meets the criteria of a true battle. The second fight was more of a raid than anything else. You had one or two guys fighting the Flood, not two armies clashing with each other like in a true battle. The second fight was a raid, a rescue mission, and therefore that should be left as a raid and this should be merely "Battle of High Charity", because int this first fight, you did have full-fledged armies fighting for control.
| |
|
| |
| Does anyone think that this makes more sense?[[User talk:Fire Eater|Fire Eater]] 23:59, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| Well I sorta see where your coming from, however generally the term "battle" means a skirmish in a conflict and even the raid of high charit was like a skirmish in a sense. I think you should stick with "First Battle of High Charity" to be honest.
| |
|
| |
| ==Rename vote==
| |
| The rename template's been on the page for a while now. I'd go ahead and move it right now, but I guess we should hold a vote just in case someone has anything against moving it.--[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 11:45, 14 April 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| {{Support}} - As the template says. The second engagement was merely a one-man raid. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 11:45, 14 April 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| :{{Support}} - I agree completely. --[[User talk:Braidenvl|"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have." -Thomas Jefferson]] 11:50, 14 April 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| {{support}} - All the way guys! [[User:Vegerot|<span style="color:midnightblue; font-weight:bold">Vegerot</span>]] ([[User talk:Vegerot|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]]) 12:21, 14 April 2011 (EDT)!!
| |
|
| |
| ==Request to Merge== | | ==Request to Merge== |
| This should be merged with the Battle of Installation 05. Its not really a separate battle, all the events are apart of one another. [[User:Councilor 'Rumilee|Councilor 'Rumilee]] ([[User talk:Councilor 'Rumilee|talk]]) 10:50, 17 December 2015 (EST) | | This should be merged with the Battle of Installation 05. Its not really a separate battle, all the events are apart of one another. [[User:Councilor 'Rumilee|Councilor 'Rumilee]] ([[User talk:Councilor 'Rumilee|talk]]) 10:50, 17 December 2015 (EST) |
| :It's a battle that's part of another larger battle, just like the [[Battle of Mombasa]] and [[Battle of Havana]] are part of the [[Battle of Earth]], or the [[Battle at Szurdok Ridge]] is part of the [[Fall of Reach]]. The Battle of Installation 05 page is big enough without all the content of this page added to it. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 11:44, 22 December 2015 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ==Name==
| |
| I feel like this article is better named Fall of High Charity. More recent media calls it that, too. --AOK 14:43, 28 December 2015 (EST)
| |
| :Agreed. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 14:54, 28 December 2015 (EST)
| |
| Everyone in agreement? I can change it if you want. --AOK 11:50, 29 December 2015 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| :Sure, go ahead. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 12:01, 29 December 2015 (EST)
| |
| Alright, doing so right now.--AOK 14:15, 29 December 2015 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ::I like the new title, but if it's been used in official media, then someone should source it properly. I don't have any recent Covenant-focused novel. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 11:20, 8 February 2016 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| :::It is consistently referred to the fall of High Charity in ''Shadow of Intent'', while I believe "Battle of High Charity" was only used once in the ''Encyclopedia''. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 17:19, 12 February 2016 (EST)
| |