Editing Talk:Covenant Bomb
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{FactOrFictionTalk|17:25, 1 January 2007|[[User:RelentlessRecusant|RR]]|I've heard it only as the "Covenant Bomb" from ''Cairo Station'', the level. The Matter/Antimatter designation I've never heard before.}} | |||
*What's disputed about the article? | *What's disputed about the article? | ||
Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
*Technically, he is disputing the name, saying that he has never heard it called an "Anti-Matter Bomb".--'''[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rot]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Rotaretilbo|Brandon]]</sup> 06:35, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | *Technically, he is disputing the name, saying that he has never heard it called an "Anti-Matter Bomb".--'''[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rot]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Rotaretilbo|Brandon]]</sup> 06:35, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
**Well what else are we gonna call it. Covenant Bomb is cr*p. We can hardly call in the Matter Bomb, That sounds like the target expands, crazy. | **Well what else are we gonna call it. Covenant Bomb is cr*p. We can hardly call in the Matter Bomb, That sounds like the target expands, crazy. {{UserForerunner}} 19:55 17/2/07 | ||
Its too scientisfic, I only heard it once in Dan Brown's Angels and demons | Its too scientisfic, I only heard it once in Dan Brown's Angels and demons | ||
Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
[[User:Raptor117|Raptor117]] 17:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC) | [[User:Raptor117|Raptor117]] 17:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
*Raptor is right, You do not need that much Anti-Matter just take out a space station. However We cannot say it's disputed, Bungie is the one that made it that big. -- | *Raptor is right, You do not need that much Anti-Matter just take out a space station. However We cannot say it's disputed, Bungie is the one that made it that big. --[[Image:Wraith.png|40px]] [[user:WRAITH|<font color="#D3D3D3">WR</font><font color="#A9A9A9">A</font><font color="#808080">IT</font><font color="#000000">H</font>]] <sup>''[[user talk:WRAITH|<font color=silver>COMM</font>]]''</sup> <sub>''[[Special:Contributions/WRAITH|<font color=black>CONTRIBS</font>]]''</sub> 18:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
::Yes, we can say it's disputed--no one ever says that this bomb uses anti-matter. --<b>[[User:Guesty-Persony-Thingy|<font color="000000">GPT</font>]]<sub>([[User talk:Guesty-Persony-Thingy|<font color="000000">talk</font>]])</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Guesty-Persony-Thingy|<font color="000000">(eating)]]</font></sup></b> 04:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | ::Yes, we can say it's disputed--no one ever says that this bomb uses anti-matter. --<b>[[User:Guesty-Persony-Thingy|<font color="000000">GPT</font>]]<sub>([[User talk:Guesty-Persony-Thingy|<font color="000000">talk</font>]])</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Guesty-Persony-Thingy|<font color="000000">(eating)]]</font></sup></b> 04:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
Line 42: | Line 43: | ||
== Antimatter Charge Merger== | == Antimatter Charge Merger== | ||
The | The Halo Encyclopedia shows a picture of the Covenant Bomb with a description and heading as an Antimatter Charge. This does not appear to be an unintentional error but rather an intentional clarification. So what does everybody think? Should the articles be merged? I think so. --[[File:Emblem 1.jpg|20px]][[User:Rusty-112|<font color="Blue">'''Rusty'''</font>]][[User:Rusty-112|<font color="Red">'''-'''</font>]][[UserWiki:Rusty-112|<font color="Blue">'''112'''</font>]] 02:07, October 29, 2009 (UTC) | ||
it does? cool! Merge away! [[User talk:Galacticdominator|Galactic]] 17:13, October 29, 2009 (UTC) | it does? cool! Merge away! [[User talk:Galacticdominator|Galactic]] 17:13, October 29, 2009 (UTC) | ||
:To Galactic, don't just vote without thinking the outcome of the merger. To Rusty, are you sure that this is an intentional clarification? Because we know for a fact that the Encyclopaedia messed up several images... well, based on what I heard in the Talk Page of the Encyclopaedia...--<font face="century gothic"><font color="red">[[User:-Ascension-|<font color="#666666">Lol</font>]]@[[User talk:-Ascension-|<font color="#666666">Phailure</font>]]</font></font> 17:55, October 29, 2009 (UTC) | :To Galactic, don't just vote without thinking the outcome of the merger. To Rusty, are you sure that this is an intentional clarification? Because we know for a fact that the Encyclopaedia messed up several images... well, based on what I heard in the Talk Page of the Encyclopaedia...--<font face="century gothic"><font color="red">[[User:-Ascension-|<font color="#666666">Lol</font>]]@[[User talk:-Ascension-|<font color="#666666">Phailure</font>]]</font></font> 17:55, October 29, 2009 (UTC) | ||