Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| == Body armor or Attachment? == | | == Body armor or Attachment == |
|
| |
|
| In the article it is stated that CQB armor is a type of ground infantry body armor. It is also stated that CQB armor is an attachment to the MJOLNIR Mark VI armor. How can it be an attachment? It looks like a different type of armor like ODST armor. If it's an attachment to the MJOLNIR Mark VI armor then that would mean that only Spartans could use it instead of ground infantry since only Spartans could use the MJOLNIR armor. Really it looks like a separate set of armor. Where in canon is it stated that it is an attachment? Where in canon is it stated that any of the armor permutations are attachments for that matter? I think there is enough information and images to confirm that it's not only used by Spartans.--[[User talk:Darth Malice the Destroyer|Darth Malice the Destroyer]] 21:16, October 10, 2009 (UTC) | | In the article it is stated that CQB armor is a type of ground infantry body armor. It is also stated that CQB armor is an attachment to the MJOLNIR Mark VI armor. How can it be an attachment? It looks like a different type of armor like ODST armor. If it's an attachment to the MJOLNIR Mark VI armor then that would mean that only Spartans could use it instead of ground infantry since only Spartans could use the MJOLNIR armor. Really it looks like a separate set of armor. Where in canon is it stated that it is an attachment? Where in canon is it stated that any of the armor permutations are attachments for that matter? I think there is enough information and images to confirm that it's not only used by Spartans.--[[User talk:Darth Malice the Destroyer|Darth Malice the Destroyer]] 21:16, October 10, 2009 (UTC) |
| : I may be posting VERY late for this, but it us called an attachment because, like all the rest of the variants, it is not an entirely new model, but a new piece ATTACHED to the original chest model. Look at it closely from the side, you'll see. [[User talk:Infernal-Blaze|Infernal-Blaze]] 15:26, 27 October 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Time Shift ==
| |
|
| |
| I think that is what it's called...
| |
| Anyway, I heard the CQB is based on the helmet in that game.
| |
| I mean like, Bungie said it was.
| |
|
| |
| We should write that. -[[User talk:Sangheili Commando 021: Fluffball Gato|Sangheili Commando 021: Fluffball Gato]] 23:29, October 15, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ==Change name==
| |
| Shouldn't we change the name to MJOLNIR Powered Assault Armor/C variant since a Mark IV version of it appears in Halo Legends, also the EVA page doesn't have the Mark VI in the title in it anymore too.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:ODST Crest.png|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 23:18, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :What do you mean, "anymore"?--[[User talk:Sangheili Commando 021: Fluffball Gato|Fluffball Gato]] 23:20, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::Let's hold off the renaming first until the episode is out.- <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Subtank|<font color="gold"><font color="#FF4F00">5</font>əb<font color="#FF4F00">'7</font>aŋk</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Subtank|<font color="#FF4F00">7alk</font>]])</sup></font> 23:22, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::That's an intelligent thing to do. --[[User talk:Sangheili Commando 021: Fluffball Gato|Fluffball Gato]] 23:27, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::::KK.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:ODST Crest.png|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 23:55, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ==CQB in Halo: The Fall of Reach==
| |
|
| |
| The recent trailer for [https://youtu.be/2SGy1W4Vsjg?t=1m12s Halo: The Fall of Reach] featured CQB on Mark IV. This is either another [[Homecoming]] situation where artistic license has been taken or 343 Industries are retconning the original fluff for certain MJOLNIR armour variants, such as EVA and CQB. [[User talk:Isinfier|Isinfier]] 16:40, 08 October 2015 (GMT)
| |