You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with
other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Judging by how high it's population is, Bounty should be an Inner Colony. Does anybody agree? - EpicZealot1239 | | Judging by how high it's population is, Bounty should be an Inner Colony. Does anybody agree? - EpicZealot1239 |
| :India would have been considered an "outer colony" of the British Empire, yet it's population at any one time probably consisted of anywhere between a fourth to a third of its total global population. Australia had some two million inhabitants when it gained autonomy from Westminster in the early 1900s. Both were far from their ultimate governing bodies and both had large populations. There's nothing to indicate where Bounty lies in Humanity's cosmic empire. Nothing can indicate her position in the stars other than a clear mention of her being an Inner or Outer colony. Conjecture is fine so long as you have nearly irrefutable evidence. However, we really only know so little about the UEG, CAA, NCA, etc. that we can't accurately suggest much at all. {{User:Helianthus/Sig}}
| |
| ::Actually I'm not even sure that it's the planet's population... For Reach, it's not the correct number at all... And if you look closely, the numbers always increase. I have no idea what the numbers mean, but it doesn't look like they represent the population for each planet. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 15:36, 7 January 2015 (EST)
| |