| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==Variant==
| |
| I know I could've just changed it(and I will), but just to clear it up to some people who got it wrong, this is ''not'' a variant, but more of an "upgrade". This is a ''new'', and ''different'' weapon, whereas the all the M90s are just one weapon with different variants. This is a completely new weapon in the BR55 series, like the M6 and the MA5. The M90 Mk I and Mk II as well as the M90A are all classified as one weapon but with different variants, similar to the M16 and its variants, and this is similar to how the M16 is different from the M4 Carbine. This isn't exactly another argument for merging, since we've all decided not to merge it, but just something to put up a few clarifications. --[[User:PX173|'''''PX''''']][[User_talk:PX173|''1'']]''7''[[Special:Contributions/PX173|''3'']] 04:18, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ==Perhaps you guys would be more open about this now?== | | ==Perhaps you guys would be more open about this now?== |
|
| |
|
| Line 12: |
Line 9: |
| Where the heck is the name of the Halo 3 weapon the BR55HB SR? Are there any sources for this, or is it fanon? [[User:Specops306|Kora 'Morhekee]] 01:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC) | | Where the heck is the name of the Halo 3 weapon the BR55HB SR? Are there any sources for this, or is it fanon? [[User:Specops306|Kora 'Morhekee]] 01:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| It appears on Halo3.com [[User:Clavix2|Clavix2]] | | It appears on Halo3.com [User:Clavix2|Clavix2]] |
|
| |
|
| ==Grenade Launcher== | | ==Grenade Launcher== |
| Why did someone add that the BR had a grenade launcher? None of the weapons in Halo have grenade launchers, excluding mods. | | Why did someone add that the BR had a grenade launcher? None of the weapons in Halo have grenade launchers, excluding mods. |
|
| |
| Reply: Have you played Halo: Custom Edition? No, I thought not, seeing as you don't know about the grenade launcher. Anyway, CMT thought it would be amusing to instant-kill Elites with the Battle Rifle grenade launcher. When you wield it, you cannot throw grenades, but you can carry up to 24 short-radius launch grenades. Very handy.
| |
|
| |
| Reply:It is a mod, so it should not be there. [[User:Grunt Crossing|Grunt Crossing]]
| |
|
| |
| Mods are non canon it probably has already been deleted. Don't put it back. An Admin will see that as vandalism [[User:Galacticdominator|<span style="color: black; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 128%;">'''~ '''</span>]]UserWiki:Galacticdominator|<span style="color: black; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 128%;">'''~ '''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Galacticdominator|<span style="color: black; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 128%;">'''~ '''</span>]][[Special:Editcount/Galacticdominator|<span style="color: black; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 128%;">'''~ '''</span>]]21:42, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| It would be good if the Assault rifle had a grenade launcher which you activated on the D-pad like on COD6[[User talk:Jay96|Jay96]] 10:58, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Designated marksman rifle== | | ==Designated marksman rifle== |
| to me it sounds like a DMR man's gun | | to me it sounds like a DMR man's gun |
|
| |
| Well, yes and no- it seems standard issue along with the Ma5c. However in terms of weapon specs, both the MA5C and the Battle Rifle have large caliburs more appropriate for the DMR man. But it preforms more like an M16 in-game.
| |
|
| |
|
| == SR=Short Range??? == | | == SR=Short Range??? == |
| Line 40: |
Line 27: |
|
| |
|
| Actually, it could mean "Scoped Rifle", which makes a lot of sense, just like the .50 M82A2 sniper rifle is known in the Marine Corp as the SASR (Special Application Scoped Rifle). "Heavy Barrelled, Scoped Rifle" 18:15, 27 December 2007 (UTC) | | Actually, it could mean "Scoped Rifle", which makes a lot of sense, just like the .50 M82A2 sniper rifle is known in the Marine Corp as the SASR (Special Application Scoped Rifle). "Heavy Barrelled, Scoped Rifle" 18:15, 27 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| It concerns me that the BR55 (halo 2) is labled as a "combat rifle" while the BR55HB SR is labled as a "battle rifle" can some one fix this [[Special:Contributions/97.77.37.10|97.77.37.10]] 16:57, May 7, 2010 (UTC) anonymous
| |
|
| |
| The Halo 2 BR55 is a combat rifle. There is no MA5B/MA5C to serve as a combat rifle. That would make the BR55 the main combat rifle at the time.--[[User talk:Caboose's Brother|Caboose's Brother]] 13:05, 26 February 2011 (EST)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Does this weapon need its own article? == | | == Does this weapon need its own article? == |
| Line 74: |
Line 55: |
|
| |
|
| No, because those are only loosely related. This is just a small variant of the BR55, not whole whole seperate rifle or configuration of a rifle. And please stop taking the suggested merge tag off these pages, it has been suggested, so it should be discussed. It should be removed when most users come to an agreement about what to do. [[User:Justin Time|Justin Time]] 19:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC) | | No, because those are only loosely related. This is just a small variant of the BR55, not whole whole seperate rifle or configuration of a rifle. And please stop taking the suggested merge tag off these pages, it has been suggested, so it should be discussed. It should be removed when most users come to an agreement about what to do. [[User:Justin Time|Justin Time]] 19:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| |
| ====Gunnery-Seargent Maiar's veiw====
| |
|
| |
| Merge. They look very simaler and - from what i have read - perform almost exactly the same. by comparison the MA5B and C assault rifles have different magazine capactitys, damage per hit, accuracy, range, fire rate and appearence. all rather significantly exept appearence.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| So you will merge them based on appearence, the reason they separated these two rifles is because there were enough changes to the behavior, and function to make a new page. The BR55 and the BR55HB SR have different damages but only slightly different. The reason for merging is because both rifles have the same tactics attached to them it is for function not appearence [[Special:Contributions/97.77.37.10|97.77.37.10]] 16:30, May 7, 2010 (UTC) concerned cite visitor
| |
|
| |
|
| == Wait == | | == Wait == |
|
| |
|
| Why were there two different articles in the first place? Why not describe all the different Battle Rifles in the same page?--File:USERICON.png]] [[User:Digipatd|<font color="Black">digipatd</font>]] [[User talk:Digipatd|<font color="Black">talk</font>]] [[User:Digipatd/Contacts|<font color="Black">contact</font>]] 21:46, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | | Why were there two different articles in the first place? Why not describe all the different Battle Rifles in the same page?--[[Image:USERICON.png]] [[User:Digipatd|<font color="Black">digipatd</font>]] [[User talk:Digipatd|<font color="Black">talk</font>]] [[User:Digipatd/Contacts|<font color="Black">contact</font>]] 21:46, 1 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| **Well thats what we are discussing, and thats what I was saying. --[[User:Justin Time|Justin Time]] 22:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | | **Well thats what we are discussing, and thats what I was saying. --[[User:Justin Time|Justin Time]] 22:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC) |
| Line 106: |
Line 78: |
| Cheers, | | Cheers, |
|
| |
|
| [[user:RelentlessRecusant|<span style="color: #6262FF; font-family: Bradley Hand ITC; font-size: 12pt;">'''RelentlessRecusant'''</span>]] 'o the [[halowikia:Halopedia:Administrators|Halopedia Team]] <small><sup>[[user talk:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="#A9A9A9">TALK</font>]]</sup> • <sub>[http://{{SERVERNAME}}/index.php?title=User_talk:RelentlessRecusant&action=edit§ion=new <font color="A9A9A9">MESSAGE</font>]</sub></small> 23:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | | [[user:RelentlessRecusant|<span style="color: #6262FF; font-family: Bradley Hand ITC; font-size: 12pt;">'''RelentlessRecusant'''</span>]] 'o the [[w:c:halo:Halopedia:Administrators|Halopedia Team]] http://images.wikia.com/rainbowsix/images/7/73/GDI2.jpg <small><sup>[[user talk:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="#A9A9A9">TALK</font>]]</sup> • <sub>[http://{{SERVERNAME}}/index.php?title=User_talk:RelentlessRecusant&action=edit§ion=new <font color="A9A9A9">MESSAGE</font>]</sub></small> 23:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC) |
| | |
| They are almost exactly the same, rec.[[User talk:Maiar|Maiar]] 08:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| They are not "almost exactly the same" the rifles are seprated by distinctions such as shape, size, and durability of the rifles. if the rifles were the same then you could modify a BR55 into a BR55HB SR by replacing internal components. Although it is difficult to see the two rifles are different [[Special:Contributions/97.77.37.10|97.77.37.10]] 16:54, May 7, 2010 (UTC) anonymous
| |
|
| |
|
| ==semi automatic?== | | ==semi automatic?== |
| Line 121: |
Line 87: |
| The battle rifle is a select-fire weapon, capable of 1 and 3 shot bursts, along with full automatic. The three round burst is the only mode illustrated in gameplay. EDIT: Forgot to sign. | | The battle rifle is a select-fire weapon, capable of 1 and 3 shot bursts, along with full automatic. The three round burst is the only mode illustrated in gameplay. EDIT: Forgot to sign. |
| [[User:Sgt. Raynor|Sgt. Raynor]] 13:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC) | | [[User:Sgt. Raynor|Sgt. Raynor]] 13:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| |
| == All That Data... ==
| |
| Many of you noticed''(but i'm sure didn't read, wusses)'' that ginormous block of BR networking statistics Bungie had in front of the 6/20 WWU. Should we include a paraphrased version in "Advantages/Disadvantages" or what, cause i would hate to see all that good data go to waste.
| |
|
| |
| Anyone? <b><i>[[User:K4|<font color="black">k4karnage</font>]]</i></b> File:MA5C ICWS Assault Rifle.jpg|50px]] <sup>[[User talk:K4|<font color="gray">Talk Channel</font>]]</sup> <sup><b>|</b></sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/K4|<font color="brown">Achivements</font>]]</sup> 15:43, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == BXR in the 'Changes' Section ==
| |
|
| |
| I'm going to remove it because it wasn't a change to the gun, but a change to the game. Also, the glitch could be preformed with any weapon, it was not limited to that one.
| |
| [[User:71.243.215.62|71.243.215.62]] 21:58, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Famas picture for the BR55 ==
| |
|
| |
| I think that a photo of the Famas is better than the photo of the X-M8 because in their look, BR and Famas look the same... more than the xm8.
| |
| :They look nothing like the same. --''[[User:Blemo|<span style="color: gray; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10pt;">'''Blemo'''</span>]] File:Progress Wheel.gif]] <small><sup>[[user talk:Blemo|<font color="#A9A9A9">'''TALK'''</font>]]</sup></small> • <sub><small> [[Special:Contributions/Blemo|<font color="#A9A9A9">'''CONTRIBUTIONS'''</font>]]</small></sub> • <sub><small>[[Special:Emailuser/Blemo|<font color="#A9A9A9">'''EMAIL'''</font>]]</small></sub> • <sub><small><font color="#A9A9A9"><span style="font-weight: light;" title="''Idiot''. (Noun) -- Anyone that is dumb enough to waste his/her time by staring at a pointless message on someone's signature for no apparent reason. By the time you are done reading this, it is already too late; you an idiot now. ^_^">'''MESSAGE'''</span></font></small></sub>'' 19:31, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| I think the artists stated that any similarities to the FAMAS were coincidental. You could also argue it looks like an M16.[[User:24.15.64.119|24.15.64.119]] 21:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)jake
| |
|
| |
| Yes, the similarities to the Famas were purely coincidental. I actually think there may have been some legal issues over it. [[User:Grunt Crossing|Grunt Crossing]]
| |
|
| |
| FAMAS is an acronym ppl remember to do it in caps.[[User talk:Maiar|Maiar]] 08:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Tactics Changes ==
| |
| Well, I'm not sure if it's just me, but I figure and I do usually use the "BR" for even close range use in Halo 3 multiplayer, and it is quite effective, does anyone disagree? I'm just asking cause I thought that people might disgaree with some of the changes such as it(BR) being able to used as a close quarters combat weapon.
| |
|
| |
| -Point-
| |
| Heads shots are effective and experienced and great marksmen in Halo 3 are able to obtain headshots in close quarters, thus taking the shield down at a much quicker rate of fire.[[User:Oy0sh1o|Oy0sh1o]] 18:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| Great Marksmen? My Ass! Im 11 And I frickin Kick Ass With the BR And I suck Compare to My Brother and his Mates you dont really need to be a "Great Marksmen" you just need to know how to use it[[User talk:Gunnery Sargeant Stacker|Gunnery Sargeant Stacker]] 21:14, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :Protip: Spray and pray doesn't work, even in video games. You actually do need to aim the rifle to hit something. <b>[[User:Smoke.|<span style="color:#404040; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Smoke</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Smoke.|<span style="color:#404040; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Sound off!</span>]]</sup></b> 09:24, January 18, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| A good tactic for brutes is to meele them, run back a bit then BAM headshot! and if the the first meele doesnt strip off their power armor then circle round as he meeles back at you and BAM assassination![[User talk:Gunnery Sargeant Stacker|Gunnery Sargeant Stacker]] 09:12, January 18, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| That's wonderful if you happen to be playing on easy.--[[User talk:Caboose's Brother|Caboose's Brother]] 13:12, 26 February 2011 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Major Marine weapon question regarding BR ==
| |
|
| |
| In the UNSC Marine wikia page, it says that the BR55 is actually the standard issue rifle of the UNSC Marine corps from Halo 2 onward, and that the Assault Rifle MA5C is actually a naval ship weapon designed for close quarters battle on ships. Is this true or only fan speculation?[[User:24.15.64.119|24.15.64.119]] 04:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)jake\
| |
|
| |
| Dunno last time I checked the UNSC Marine standard issue rifle was actually the MA5C ( I mean well you see like 10,000 of them in the game and uncommonly armed with a BR.) I think its speculation. Futhermore the MA5C ( note its called an ASSAULT Rifle) seems like a future variant of the Thompson or the m4a1 due to its somewhat smaller size. I think its rather a tactical speculation yet not a true one. Oh and did you find the source for it? Cause I really doubt that the player manual would even state that. [[User:Oy0sh1o|Oy0sh1o]] 17:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| The BR55 WAS the standard issue rifle in Halo 2 but then the MA5C Succeded it because it was over powered, still it is the best gun in the halo universe no doubt.[[User talk:Gunnery Sargeant Stacker|Gunnery Sargeant Stacker]] 20:55, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| Yeah I agree with you, this is just what somebody wrote on the UNSC Marine Corps page, saying the Halo 3 BR is the Marine's main weapon and the MA5C is only a naval trooper weapon for use on ships in close quarters. However, Bungie kinda proves him wrong in their "profile" of the MA5C where they "interviewed" Marines using it on the front lines. It's a marine weapon no doubt. But someone should fix that page.[[User:IamSecretSanta|IamSecretSanta]] 18:00, 13 August 2008 (UTC)jake
| |
|
| |
| Yes, it has been prooved that the MA5C is the standard issue weapon of the UNSC Marines. The BR is a sharpshooter's weapon, assuming they don't have a Sniper Rifle around to shoot
| |
|
| |
| NO accually because the halo encyclopedia says this about the BR55 series:'' When nothing else gets the job done, the BR55 will do. As the standard gun for all UNSC forces, the BR55 is the easiest gun to pick up and use. Almost al soldeirs have trained with it, making its slight defects less noticable, while accentuating its high rate of fire and accuracy. With both semi-automatic and burst-fire modes, the BR55 is the backbone of all UNSC armed forces.''
| |
|
| |
| ... and this about the MA5 series:'' The inaccuracy of the Assault rifle has rendered it obsolete on most battlefields, and its weakend attack against energy shields makes it a liabillity against the Covenant. However, due to its large clip and high rate of fire, the MA5 is ideal for expeditionary forces, where accuracy is often secondary to firepower.''
| |
|
| |
| This proves that the Battle rifle is the standard weapon for the UNSC armed forces.[[User talk:Gunnery Sargeant Stacker|Gunnery Sargeant Stacker]] 09:26, January 18, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| While I understand that that is what the Encyclopedia says it also makes several errors, such as stating that the MA5C has a 24 round clip. Also, you will notice that while that is what the Encyclopedia says, if you look at gameplay the MA5C is used far more by the UNSC Marine Corps. Also please check your spelling when you quote something. When you put something in quotation marks you are pretty much saying that you are writing it EXACTLY as the book says. If you think about it really hard, you will notice that it is a designated marksman's rifle, not a standard infantry weapon. The Halo Encyclopedia says on the same page that the MA5C has a 24 round clip and then has a 60 round clip. Personally, I find that Bungie doesn't know shit about firearms. Thanks for understanding--[[User talk:Caboose's Brother|Caboose's Brother]] 13:29, 26 February 2011 (EST)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| :Look at it like a Thompson vs a M1 Garand from WW2. <font color="lime">'''Teh lolz!'''</font> [[User:Bioniclepluslotr|<span style="color: lime; font-family: Halo3,Papyrus; font-size: 12pt;">'''Bionicle+Lotr'''</span>]] 15:44, October 17, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == FAMAS/XM8 Inspiration ==
| |
|
| |
| It was confirmed that the similarities to the FAMAS were coincidental. Where is the proof that the XM8 partially inspired it?
| |
|
| |
| == nice page ==
| |
|
| |
| Nice page I got a lot from it.
| |
|
| |
| == Great gun! ==
| |
|
| |
| This Weapon is one of my alltime favorite Weapons.Its,when right used,the second powerfulest Sniperweapon after the Sniperrifle and the Laserbeam.Just my opinion.
| |
|
| |
| Laserbeam? i take it you mean the particle beam rifle? When i use the BR in multi-player its hit-damage is pathetic. maybe i have a handi-cap on without knowing it. ppl kill me with like 3 bursts to the chest. i give em four to the head and theyer fine.[[User talk:Maiar|Maiar]] 08:50, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| IN halo 2 when you first get it it sucks because you aim up, fire, and it shoots this pathetic 3 round burst and your like,Dude, is this really the replacement for the good ole MA5B? it sucks? And then you lean to use it and your like, DUDE this Gun PWNS ASS! Wooh! die covie B***hs and then in HAlo 3 your like were is my BR? ooo yay i have a AR, Wait this gun Sucks Haard! So the MA5B kicks ass so do the BR55 AND the BR55HB SR, But the MA5C? It Sucks Its pathetic.[[User talk:Gunnery Sargeant Stacker|Gunnery Sargeant Stacker]] 21:05, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| This gun kicks ass! I love playing team BR's on social slayer. I kick ass with it. I used to think it sucked, but it's a lot better now.--[[User talk:Canadian Reject|Canadian Reject]] 16:03, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == The BR is laem ==
| |
|
| |
| Srsly, it's unbalanced as hell.
| |
| Tone down it's power.
| |
| Or treat it as the power weapon it currently is.
| |
| No spawns, and 1-2 on map.[[Special:Contributions/24.1.34.230|24.1.34.230]] 22:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| OMG you know nothing about a wiki!Or a talk page in general![[User talk:Sith Venator|Sith Venator]] 17:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| And you know nothing of containment![[Special:Contributions/24.1.34.230|24.1.34.230]] 22:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| Lol Nice one Haha[[User talk:Gunnery Sargeant Stacker|Gunnery Sargeant Stacker]] 21:17, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| Haha. Good one.--[[User talk:Canadian Reject|Canadian Reject]] 16:08, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :This coming from the reject?[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Surpreme Commander Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Holonet</span>]]) 15:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ==Crosshair==
| |
| I've made a custom crosshair for the Battle Rifle.
| |
| Picture:
| |
| <math>
| |
| \setlength{\unitlength}{.5in}
| |
| \begin{picture}(10,10)(-5,5)
| |
| \linethickness{1pt}
| |
| \put(-0.75, 0){\vector(1,0){0.50}}
| |
| \put(0,-0.75){\vector(0,1){0.50}}
| |
| \put(0.75, 0){\vector(-1,0){0.50}}
| |
| \put(0,0.75){\vector(0,-1){0.50}}
| |
| \put(0,0){\circle{2}}
| |
| \end{picture}
| |
| </math> [[User talk:Dreaddraco2|Dreaddraco2]] 21:37, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| How to do it:
| |
|
| |
| *math
| |
| *\setlength{\unitlength}{.5in}
| |
| *\begin{picture}(10,10)(-5,5)
| |
| *\linethickness{1pt}
| |
| *\put(-0.75, 0){\vector(1,0){0.50}}
| |
| *\put(0,-0.75){\vector(0,1){0.50}}
| |
| *\put(0.75, 0){\vector(-1,0){0.50}}
| |
| *\put(0,0.75){\vector(0,-1){0.50}}
| |
| *\put(0,0){\circle{2}}
| |
| *\end{picture}
| |
| */math
| |
|
| |
| Before and after the "Math" and "/math" add to triangular brackets. (">")
| |
| [[User talk:Dreaddraco2|Dreaddraco2]] 21:37, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ==Counterweapon==
| |
| Actually the Assault rifle even at close range get killed by the BR,people in matchmaking do it all the time.I suggest to remove it unless you add melee to the assault rifle.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] File:Red Team.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Holonet</span>]]) 14:56, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :Then the players with the Assault Rifle suck. An MA5C wielder can kill someone with a Battle Rifle, provided they don't make themselves an easy target. <div style="font-variant:small-caps"><b>[[User:Smoke.|<font color="#666666">Smoke</font>]]</b></div> 15:10, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ::No they go for headshots killing them quicker no matter what the range.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] File:Red Team.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Holonet</span>]]) 15:13, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :::As I said, if they don't make themselves an easy target, then they can score a kill. Battle Rifles are very accurate. This can be turned against the wielder - keep moving and disrupting their aim by shooting them. Of course, most players run in a straight line, making it easy to pick them off. <div style="font-variant:small-caps"><b>[[User:Smoke.|<font color="#666666">Smoke</font>]]</b></div> 15:18, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Under-rated? ==
| |
|
| |
| I think in some aspects of this article the BR is slightly underated. I say this because the article makes it seem like the weapon is totally inaffective at close range. Yes I understand that it's not designed for close range, but with some skill it can acually be an moderately effective short range weapon. If you play matchmaking then you know what I'm talking about. Either you or someone else is charging an enemy with a close range automatic weapon and they get killed with the BR in fairly close range.
| |
|
| |
| == Name Again ==
| |
|
| |
| Let's break it down.
| |
|
| |
| The article title is "BR55HB SR Battle Rifle", though the ''Halo 3'' manual identifies the weapon as simply "BR55HB SR".
| |
|
| |
| "BR" clearly stands for "Battle Rifle" -- the ''Halo 2'' battle rifle was just the "BR55", so what else would it stand for?
| |
|
| |
| "Battle Rifle 55HB SR Battle Rifle."
| |
|
| |
| We have a problem: the repetition of the weapon's name. So we could truncate it to:
| |
|
| |
| "Battle Rifle 55HB SR."
| |
|
| |
| That, however, begs the question of what "HB" and "SR" really stand for. "B" may refer to "Barrel", as in the lengthened barrel compared to the BR55; if that's the case, then "H" describes either another trait of the weapon or is some adjective or modifier on the word "barrel". The Trivia speculates that "HB" is "Heavy Barrel"; I didn't see where in the article it mentioned any added weight on the barrel, but I know the barrel was changed (lengthened) from that of the BR55, so "Barrel" is probably accurate. The Trivia also speculates that "SR" is "Scoped Rifle".
| |
|
| |
| So now we have "Battle Rifle 55 [Heavy Barrel[?]] [Scoped Rifle[?]]."
| |
|
| |
| Another redundancy, one that I haven't noticed in ''any'' other fully-canonical weapon names. I think that "R", and possibly also "S", stand for something else. The point is, "''BR''55HB SR ''Battle Rifle''" is redundant. On a related note, "BR55 Battle Rifle" has the same problem. <span style="background:#AADDAA;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><b>File:DavidJCobb_Emblem.svg|16px]] [[User:DavidJCobb|<span style="color:#000;position:relative;top:.15em">DavidJCobb </span>]]</b></span> 01:22, 29
| |
| August 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| Are you Guys Stupid or what? Its the "Battle rifle Type-55 Heavy Barrel Scoped Rifle" In halo 3 and in halo 2 its the
| |
| "Battle rifle Type-55" Duuuuh[[User talk:Gunnery Sargeant Stacker|Gunnery Sargeant Stacker]] 21:10, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| Please specify where it says Type? Please stop acting like an obnoxious 10 year old. sorry to be a dick but grow up. PS you spelt Sergeant wrong.--[[User talk:Caboose's Brother|Caboose's Brother]] 13:36, 26 February 2011 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Pic? ==
| |
|
| |
| You think we should take off the pic of the marine "firing full automatic with the BR"? I mean, we can't really show that through pictures, since we could just put up a picture of someone firing, and you can just edit a GIF to loop. I'm not saying that it can't fire full auto, since I know it can, it's just that we can't prove it with pictures. We can with videos, as long as it isn't just somebody firing full auto for its entirety, but such a video wouldn't be worth it to put on the article, and the only one we have is Landfall, anyway. [[User:PX173|'''''PX''''']][[User_talk:PX173|''1'']]''7''[[Special:Contributions/PX173|''3'']] 15:10, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Downgraded? ==
| |
|
| |
| Why does this gun seem downgraded from the Halo 2 version? It has slower rate of fire, less accuracy, etc. Wouldn't a newer version have the opposite changes? Or were these changes just for gameplay balance and not actually canon changes? <font color="lime">'''Teh lolz!'''</font> [[User:Bioniclepluslotr|<span style="color: lime; font-family: Halo3,Papyrus; font-size: 12pt;">'''Bionicle+Lotr'''</span>]] 15:22, October 17, 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :Because the BR is not the Single Automatic Rifle in the game like in Halo 2. <span style="background:Crimson">[[User:Werewolfhell|<span style="color:Maroon ;">'''The Daddy'''</span>]] http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/fallout11ty/images/5/51/Banhammer.gif</span> 15:24, October 17, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :Gameplay balance. <b>[[User:Smoke.|<span style="color:Gray; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Smoke</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Smoke.|<span style="color:Gray; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Sound off!</span>]]</sup></b> 15:26, October 17, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == ODST? ==
| |
|
| |
| How is this in ODST? <font color="lime">'''Teh lolz!'''</font> [[User:Bioniclepluslotr|<span style="color: lime; font-family: Halo3,Papyrus; font-size: 12pt;">'''Bionicle+Lotr'''</span>]] 15:27, October 17, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :As far as I know, it isn't. <b>[[User:Smoke.|<span style="color:Gray; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Smoke</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Smoke.|<span style="color:Gray; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Sound off!</span>]]</sup></b> 15:27, October 17, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ::Then what's the Halo 3 ODST tag on there? <font color="lime">'''Teh lolz!'''</font> [[User:Bioniclepluslotr|<span style="color: lime; font-family: Halo3,Papyrus; font-size: 12pt;">'''Bionicle+Lotr'''</span>]] 15:39, October 17, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :::I removed it. <b>[[User:Smoke.|<span style="color:Gray; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Smoke</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Smoke.|<span style="color:Gray; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Sound off!</span>]]</sup></b> 15:54, October 17, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ::::It is in a cutscene.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:ODST Crest.png|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 21:26, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Halo 2 Version Not spreading? ==
| |
|
| |
| In the changes section it says that the Halo 2 version does not spread...Does it mean spreading while stationary (not moving, nor a moving target) or spreading while moving? If the latter, If you look at one spot and shoot while turning, it will leave 3 seperate bullet holes in the wall you shoot.
| |
|
| |
| == Range error ==
| |
|
| |
| I noticed something weird. the Halo Encyclopedia says the BR's effective range is 200 meters and yet the page states it's 950 meters. Which is it?--[[User talk:Zervziel|Zervziel]] 22:50, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :I assume Halo Encyclopaedia's entry was ignored and that Halo: Contact Harvest's entry is far more accurate.- <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Subtank|<font color="gold"><font color="#FF4F00">5</font>əb<font color="#FF4F00">'7</font>aŋk</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Subtank|<font color="#FF4F00">7alk</font>]])</sup></font> 23:02, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :
| |
| :The BR55 and BR55HB SR both have an effective range of 200 meters while the XBR55 has an effective range of 950 which was indeed in contact harvest [[Special:Contributions/97.77.37.10|97.77.37.10]] 16:42, May 7, 2010 (UTC) anonymous
| |
|
| |
| The Halo Encyclopedia makes several errors when they talk about firearms.--[[User talk:Caboose's Brother|Caboose's Brother]] 13:37, 26 February 2011 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Pathfinder11 ==
| |
|
| |
| First of all, you have no sources to back this up. Secondly, the rounds involved use two different casings, are most likely loaded to different pressures, and cannot be interchanged unless the firearm itself is extensively modified to accept the other round (in this case, 7.62 NATO); modifications including lengthening the magazine well to accept a magazine that takes 7.62 NATO rounds, as the projectile is 51 millimeters long as opposed to 40 millimeters; a 7.62 NATO chamber and bore, and a new bolt to enable extracting and ejecting the spent casing. There may be more but that's the minimum; it's hard to talk specifics when one of the cartridges in question is fictional.
| |
|
| |
| "Ypu can use two different rounds if you swap out the bolt and barrel. Example of this would be the Bushmaster ACR that can fire 5.56mm and 6.8mm."
| |
|
| |
| 5.56 NATO and 6.8 SPC rounds are similar in length (45mm and 43mm), and 6.8 SPC weapons are often modified from 5.56 weapons systems (the AR-15, for instance). Thus, this is why you only have to change the bolt and barrel assembly, as well as the magazine, as 6.8 SPC rounds may not feed from 5.56 magazines. 7.62 NATO is much longer than the 9.5mm round used in the BR55 (51mm as opposed to 40mm). As noted above, the weapon requires extensive modification. Think AR-15 and AR-10.
| |
|
| |
| Unless you have a credible source, do not re-add the information. <b>[[User:Smoke.|<span style="color:Gray; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Smoke</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Smoke.|<span style="color:Gray; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Sound off!</span>]]</sup></b> 15:12, 2 March 2011 (EST)
| |
| :The infobox still says that it fires "9.5x40mm KURZ/.374 caliber rounds". I'd recommend fixing it.--[[User talk:The All-knowing Sith'ari|The All-knowing Sith'ari]] 15:25, 2 March 2011 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ::He was saying that you could use 7.62x51mm rounds in this weapon, provided you change out the barrel and bolt. Not true. The Infobox said that to begin with. <b>[[User:Smoke.|<span style="color:Gray; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Smoke</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Smoke.|<span style="color:Gray; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Sound off!</span>]]</sup></b> 15:28, 2 March 2011 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Source for BR55 Heavy Barrel Service Rifle confirmed in Halo 4? ==
| |
| [[File:BR in H4.jpg|right|thumb|]]
| |
| [[File:H4 chief.png|right|thumb|Jugus uploaded this "fake" image.]]
| |
| I see that the Battle Rifle variant that will be in Halo 4 is the BR55 Heavy Barrel Service Rifle variant from Halo 3, according to this wiki, but I don't remember reading any sources that confirmed this, but I may have missed it. So is it possible for the source to be sighted please? Thanks. - Guest 15:28, 8 March 2012 (EST)
| |
| :Super-zoom.[[User:Hacame|<span class="plainlinks" style="color:#483C32; font-family:lucida console; font-size:18px;">HA</span>]][[User talk:Hacame|<span class="plainlinks" style="color:#483C32; font-family:lucida console; font-size:15px;">came</span>]] 16:38, 8 March 2012 (EST)
| |
| ::The reason your edits were reverted was because you provided no source and it will continue until a source is added. How do I know that picture is not a fake?--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}}
| |
| :::Did you even try zooming in on other images? Guess not. Stop removing legitimate edits unless you can prove otherwise.[[User:Hacame|<span class="plainlinks" style="color:#483C32; font-family:lucida console; font-size:18px;">HA</span>]][[User talk:Hacame|<span class="plainlinks" style="color:#483C32; font-family:lucida console; font-size:15px;">came</span>]] 17:01, 8 March 2012 (EST)
| |
| ::::Jugus is an admin and I doubt he'd upload fake images. Don't accuse him of uploading fake images.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}}
| |
| :::::I was not saying he is uploading fake images. The quotation around the word '''fake''' should give you the hint that I was making a sarcastic remark....... funny how you didn't detect it. Or that you still ignoring my direction on zooming in other images which support my claim.[[User:Hacame|<span class="plainlinks" style="color:#483C32; font-family:lucida console; font-size:18px;">HA</span>]][[User talk:Hacame|<span class="plainlinks" style="color:#483C32; font-family:lucida console; font-size:15px;">came</span>]] 17:13, 8 March 2012 (EST)
| |
| :::::::Fix your attitude. One thing here is that you don't ever do something like that, even if it's sarcastic.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}}
| |
| ::::::::Thank you, Jugus, for uploading the pictures. I now see that it is the same variant, but perhaps it's a different version or model or something along those lines since it's appearance is very different. Thanks again! :) - Guest 21:11, 8 March 2012 (EST)
| |
| :::::::::Well according to the newest Bulletin 343 is continuing Bungie's tradition of having the wrong name on the weapon. It's the BR85HB SR[[User talk:ArchedThunder|ArchedThunder]] 21:32, 15 March 2012 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::::I Know, I'm creating an Article. [[User talk:DefeatingLine|DefeatingLine]] 21:39, 15 March 2012 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::::Yea, I saw that. That means that it is a new model and not a different variant. The name is probably a placeholder. - Guest 21:35, 15 March 2012 (EST)
| |
| ::::::::::::Did feel like we were jumping the gun a little. But I can't really blame you based on the evidence. Nice work with the restoration DefeatingLine! -[[User:TheLostJedi|'''<span style="color:maroon">TheLostJedi</span>''']] 23:29, 17 March 2012 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::::::Thank you! There was probably a simpler way to do it than the way I did, but it wouldn't let me undo the specific edit, and I wasn't sure which image was used as the main image, so I didn't want to edit it. - [[User talk:DefeatingLine|DefeatingLine]] 12:02, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Chinese Assault Rifle ==
| |
|
| |
| The other day I was playing Modern Warfare 3's Survival Mode. I was armed with a Chinese QBZ 95 with ACOG scope. When I fired it, I was shocked, because I was hearing the Battle Rifle sound clip. Futhermore, the first-person view of the QBZ 95 ACOG looks almost exactly like the BR55HB. I was wondering if Bungie used the QBZ 95 for the Battle Rifle's sound file, and whether or not the first person view is a coincidence? --[[User talk:Sierra 109|Sierra 109]] 14:33, 6 April 2012 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ==The infobox data is not showing==
| |
|
| |
| Hey, I don't know if this was intended or not, but I couldn't but notice that some (or perhaps most) of the information that is supposed to show in the weapon infobox, yet for some odd reason, it is not showing up like it's supposed to. Could somebody fix this? I tried, but I think something is missing that would allow the information to show when the changes are saved. A little help here would be most welcome. --[[User talk:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] 19:05, 13 October 2012 (EDT)Xamikaze330
| |