Editing Talk:AV-19 SkyHawk
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
Some Halopedians have concluded that the ship that attacks John in the comic is not the proper depiction of a SkyHawk but instead of a [[AV-22 Sparrowhawk]]. However, I disagree with that because in the issue the fighter lacks the "Tail" of a Sparrowhawk and the tips of the wings are actually bent backwards and NOT forward as we would see on Sparrowhawk. [[User talk:Forgotten Helljumper|Forgotten Helljumper]] 16:55, 28 July 2012 (EDT) | Some Halopedians have concluded that the ship that attacks John in the comic is not the proper depiction of a SkyHawk but instead of a [[AV-22 Sparrowhawk]]. However, I disagree with that because in the issue the fighter lacks the "Tail" of a Sparrowhawk and the tips of the wings are actually bent backwards and NOT forward as we would see on Sparrowhawk. [[User talk:Forgotten Helljumper|Forgotten Helljumper]] 16:55, 28 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
:You won't be able to see the tail of a Sparrowhawk from such angle as the tail is swept down and not up. And the shadowing of the tips of the wings are stylised in such way that they are bent forward. Unless you have another image that shows otherwise...— <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 17:18, 28 July 2012 (EDT) | :You won't be able to see the tail of a Sparrowhawk from such angle as the tail is swept down and not up. And the shadowing of the tips of the wings are stylised in such way that they are bent forward. Unless you have another image that shows otherwise...— <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 17:18, 28 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
File:Skyhawk 2..jpg|150px|thumb|right|Truster instead of a tail? | [[File:Skyhawk 2..jpg|150px|thumb|right|Truster instead of a tail?]] | ||
File:Skyhawk 1..jpg|150px|thumb|right|wing tips are bent backward. | File:Skyhawk 1..jpg|150px|thumb|right|wing tips are bent backward. | ||
That wasn't a very good pic. I'll upload a different one. [[User talk:Forgotten Helljumper|Forgotten Helljumper]] 17:31, 28 July 2012 (EDT) | That wasn't a very good pic. I'll upload a different one. [[User talk:Forgotten Helljumper|Forgotten Helljumper]] 17:31, 28 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
Thank you for your time :} [[User talk:Forgotten Helljumper|Forgotten Helljumper]] 17:41, 28 July 2012 (EDT) | Thank you for your time :} [[User talk:Forgotten Helljumper|Forgotten Helljumper]] 17:41, 28 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
::Amended article. Looks like it lacks the twin tail that the Sparrowhawk has.— <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 09:46, 29 July 2012 (EDT) | ::Amended article. Looks like it lacks the twin tail that the Sparrowhawk has.— <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 09:46, 29 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
==50mm?== | ==50mm?== | ||
I'm pretty sure 50mm was a typo and the author meant to write 50 caliber. The [http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab60/Rama88_photo/50mm_zps02fe6d21.jpg showings] in TFoR are far closer to a .50 caliber machinegun than a 50mm autocannon( for reference, [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy9VPTWyLh0 this] is a real life 20mm autocannon. [[User:Geomax|Geomax]] ([[User talk:Geomax|talk]]) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (EDT) | I'm pretty sure 50mm was a typo and the author meant to write 50 caliber. The [http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab60/Rama88_photo/50mm_zps02fe6d21.jpg showings] in TFoR are far closer to a .50 caliber machinegun than a 50mm autocannon( for reference, [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy9VPTWyLh0 this] is a real life 20mm autocannon. [[User:Geomax|Geomax]] ([[User talk:Geomax|talk]]) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (EDT) |