Halopedia talk:Featured/Article: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
Shazamikaze (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I feel there should be a time limit on how long an article nomination should last (one week, two weeks, etc.?). It would certainly move things along a lot faster. Any thoughts on this?--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 00:54, 21 October 2013 (EDT) | I feel there should be a time limit on how long an article nomination should last (one week, two weeks, etc.?). It would certainly move things along a lot faster. Any thoughts on this?--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 00:54, 21 October 2013 (EDT) | ||
:Sure, but only as long as someone on the staff makes sure it is known to every user on the wiki. --'''''[[User:Xamikaze330|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Halo;">Xamikaze330</span>]]''''' <small>['''''[[User talk:Xamikaze330|<font color="Blue">Transmission</font>]]'''''|'''''[[Special:Contributions/Xamikaze330|<font color="Green">Commencing</font>]]''''']</small> 02:14, 21 October 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330 | :Sure, but only as long as someone on the staff makes sure it is known to every user on the wiki. --'''''[[User:Xamikaze330|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Halo;">Xamikaze330</span>]]''''' <small>['''''[[User talk:Xamikaze330|<font color="Blue">Transmission</font>]]'''''|'''''[[Special:Contributions/Xamikaze330|<font color="Green">Commencing</font>]]''''']</small> 02:14, 21 October 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330 | ||
The limit used to be a month, but judging from the page history, one-two weeks appears to be the amount of time it takes for a nomination to be featured, though partially because those get nominated at the end of the month. As articles are featured based on quality, I see no problem with having more than one featured article each month, as it would mean more articles are at their fullest potential. Plus, we don't have that many featured articles anyway. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 03:17, 21 October 2013 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 03:17, October 21, 2013
Randomisation?
Perhaps randomise the past featured articles so that we can have some variety in the Main Page? — subtank 07:56, 1 May 2011 (EDT)
- I'm not sure how we could do that but I'll look into it when I get time. - File:Major.png Nìcmávr (Tálk) 14:28, 9 May 2011 (EDT)
Change?
Should we change the featured article now. There has been an article nominated.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs
Addition to nomination requirements
I feel there should be a time limit on how long an article nomination should last (one week, two weeks, etc.?). It would certainly move things along a lot faster. Any thoughts on this?--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 00:54, 21 October 2013 (EDT)
- Sure, but only as long as someone on the staff makes sure it is known to every user on the wiki. --Xamikaze330 [Transmission|Commencing] 02:14, 21 October 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330
The limit used to be a month, but judging from the page history, one-two weeks appears to be the amount of time it takes for a nomination to be featured, though partially because those get nominated at the end of the month. As articles are featured based on quality, I see no problem with having more than one featured article each month, as it would mean more articles are at their fullest potential. Plus, we don't have that many featured articles anyway. Tuckerscreator(stalk) 03:17, 21 October 2013 (EDT)