Page history
May 21, 2016
May 2, 2016
March 23, 2016
February 3, 2016
November 7, 2015
July 29, 2015
April 15, 2015
January 21, 2015
January 13, 2015
January 8, 2015
November 21, 2014
October 26, 2014
October 12, 2014
September 14, 2014
August 20, 2014
July 4, 2014
June 24, 2014
June 9, 2014
May 4, 2014
May 3, 2014
February 22, 2014
December 11, 2013
October 22, 2013
September 19, 2013
June 9, 2013
May 19, 2013
December 5, 2012
October 20, 2012
June 9, 2012
April 12, 2012
October 25, 2011
→Halo Reach: brutes might have their own that we don't know about
−105
→Halo Reach
+1
→Halo Reach
+104
October 22, 2011
Undo revision 952688 by ArchedThunder (talk) Yes, and it's the same Encyclopedia that also mislabels the Brute Majors as Minors.
−9
Have you even seen the newest Encyclopedia?
+9
Undo revision 952673 by ArchedThunder (talk) 343 is only taking as canon for Anniversary, which is not the furtherest in the timeline. Halo 3 is, therefore it is the main image.
−9
Okay this is just getting rediculus, are you just going to ignore the fact that even 343 is taking the Reach apperance as Canon? Also why are the Brute Minor and Chieftain the only pages you guys are doing this to.
+9
Reverted edits by ArchedThunder (Talk) to last version by Subtank
m−9
All that was decided there was that Characters will be represented by their Halo 3 looks, All Enemies will still be represented by Reach because that is how they look in canon now.
+9
Revert; see http://www.halopedian.com/Talk:John-117#Top_image
m−9
if that were true then we would be using Halo 3 models for EVERY thing. We will use the Reach ones because it is the most current game.
+9