Editing Halopedia talk:Requests for adminship/Devout Atheist

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 10: Line 10:
::Well I mean to edit them a long time ago, but the page was closed almost immediately as I answered the questions, so I couldn't really do anything about until now. And I admit, some my first answers weren't that good, people have every right to criticize them.[[User talk:Devout Atheist|Commander Devout Atheist]] 15:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
::Well I mean to edit them a long time ago, but the page was closed almost immediately as I answered the questions, so I couldn't really do anything about until now. And I admit, some my first answers weren't that good, people have every right to criticize them.[[User talk:Devout Atheist|Commander Devout Atheist]] 15:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC)


::"''Poor choice of words + bad answer for one question and everyone goes against him''" Did you seriously say that? I wouldn't call no more than 7 or so people "everyone." And he has the right to change his answers, all of them completely if he so chooses, that doesn't necessarily change opinions. Ghost sangheili
::"''Poor choice of words + bad answer for one question and everyone goes against him''" Did you seriously say that? I wouldn't call no more than 7 or so people "everyone." And he has the right to change his answers, all of them completely if he so chooses, that doesn't necessarily change opinions. {{Signature/Ghost sangheili}}


Many people here say we've got too many Admins if Devout gets that title, but I honestly think that [[User:Simon rjh|Simon rjh]] has been quite inactive for some time, at least compared to other Admins. Maybe one more might work as guarantee.. Spirit of Fire
Many people here say we've got too many Admins if Devout gets that title, but I honestly think that [[User:Simon rjh|Simon rjh]] has been quite inactive for some time, at least compared to other Admins. Maybe one more might work as guarantee.. Spirit of Fire


:I agree, the "too many admins" argument is relatively weak in my opinion. Ghost sangheili
:I agree, the "too many admins" argument is relatively weak in my opinion. {{Signature/Ghost sangheili}}


::Ghost sangheili, I didn't mean it literally! Maybe I'm the one that used a bad choice of words... And as per you and Spirit of Fire, the "too many admins" argument is weak. — [[User Talk:Kougermasters|<span style="color: DarkOliveGreen; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 120%;">Lt.</span>]] [[Special:Editcount/Kougermasters|<span style="color: SeaGreen; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 120%;">Commander</span>]] [[User:Kougermasters|<span style="color: CadetBlue; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 120%;">Kouger</span>]] 16:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
::Ghost sangheili, I didn't mean it literally! Maybe I'm the one that used a bad choice of words... And as per you and Spirit of Fire, the "too many admins" argument is weak. — [[User Talk:Kougermasters|<span style="color: DarkOliveGreen; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 120%;">Lt.</span>]] [[Special:Editcount/Kougermasters|<span style="color: SeaGreen; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 120%;">Commander</span>]] [[User:Kougermasters|<span style="color: CadetBlue; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 120%;">Kouger</span>]] 16:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)


:::Then next time please articulate your point in a clearer fashion so that it may be properly addressed. Ghost sangheili
:::Then next time please articulate your point in a clearer fashion so that it may be properly addressed. {{Signature/Ghost sangheili}}


:::Honestly, you think ''we'' have too many admins? I agree that too many admins is not an excuse. I've known wikis that have had so many, that there was at least 1 online any time you visited. But, too many admins... I mean, put it this way: More admins = less vandals. I think that Devout is good with anti-vandalism. If he spots it, he can just revert and ban. I do a lot of anti-vandalism, but I always have to report, as do all many rollbakers. Also, Simon has been kinda inactive lately. Exactly what is the harm of having a big bunch of admins? It would give a 24-hour protection of the site, wouldn't it? User:Nicmavr
:::Honestly, you think ''we'' have too many admins? I agree that too many admins is not an excuse. I've known wikis that have had so many, that there was at least 1 online any time you visited. But, too many admins... I mean, put it this way: More admins = less vandals. I think that Devout is good with anti-vandalism. If he spots it, he can just revert and ban. I do a lot of anti-vandalism, but I always have to report, as do all many rollbakers. Also, Simon has been kinda inactive lately. Exactly what is the harm of having a big bunch of admins? It would give a 24-hour protection of the site, wouldn't it? User:Nicmavr
Line 96: Line 96:
I'll tell you why. Because some people always give idiotic reasons on opposition, like: Poor response to question 7, etc. That get's everyone else started, and we end up arguing. '''That's why'''. User:Nicmavr}
I'll tell you why. Because some people always give idiotic reasons on opposition, like: Poor response to question 7, etc. That get's everyone else started, and we end up arguing. '''That's why'''. User:Nicmavr}


:You should have been more careful in how you worded that. If you want to call "Poor response to question 7" idiotic, keep that to yourself. To others, it's more significant. In saying that, you've basically insulted a few of the sites most influential, hardest worker, and longest standing users. Also, the reasons that are stated in one's vote aren't necessarily ''all'' of the reasons they oppose something. For example, while I stated my issue with the answer to one question, I could list about 5 questions who's answers I had issues with. In terms of all this drama that goes on is almost always the direct result of a single user's careless action or a simple misunderstanding that sets off a chain reaction. And I would really recommend you say something to take back that comment, becuase all you really did with it was add some fuel for the flames. Ghost sangheili
:You should have been more careful in how you worded that. If you want to call "Poor response to question 7" idiotic, keep that to yourself. To others, it's more significant. In saying that, you've basically insulted a few of the sites most influential, hardest worker, and longest standing users. Also, the reasons that are stated in one's vote aren't necessarily ''all'' of the reasons they oppose something. For example, while I stated my issue with the answer to one question, I could list about 5 questions who's answers I had issues with. In terms of all this drama that goes on is almost always the direct result of a single user's careless action or a simple misunderstanding that sets off a chain reaction. And I would really recommend you say something to take back that comment, becuase all you really did with it was add some fuel for the flames. {{Signature/Ghost sangheili}}


::Insulting? I'm not insulting anyone. I'm just saying(and a few others agree) that it's a bit silly a reason fort that. I mean, there's no right or wrong in choosing your answers. Maybe he just choose poor words, but so what? ''That'' is an oppose reason? I maen, come on, it's harsh... User:Nicmavr
::Insulting? I'm not insulting anyone. I'm just saying(and a few others agree) that it's a bit silly a reason fort that. I mean, there's no right or wrong in choosing your answers. Maybe he just choose poor words, but so what? ''That'' is an oppose reason? I maen, come on, it's harsh... User:Nicmavr


:::The initial comment is ''easily'' interpreted as offensive. Did you fully read my comment? I said that "...the reasons that are stated in one's vote aren't necessarily ''all'' of the reasons they oppose something." Who says that the answer to question 7 is the ''only'' reason I oppose this RfA? I have plenty of reasons, and I, like everyone else, have the right to keep them personal. Ghost sangheili
:::The initial comment is ''easily'' interpreted as offensive. Did you fully read my comment? I said that "...the reasons that are stated in one's vote aren't necessarily ''all'' of the reasons they oppose something." Who says that the answer to question 7 is the ''only'' reason I oppose this RfA? I have plenty of reasons, and I, like everyone else, have the right to keep them personal. {{Signature/Ghost sangheili}}
::::I agree with Ghost Sangheili, Nick. Plus, nobody mentioned this vote in the whole discussion. It can't be considered the reason of the argument. - [[User:JEA13|'''<span style="color:orange;">Μητσάρας</span>''']] [[User talk:JEA13|'''<span style="color:orange;">κι όποιος</span>''']] [[Special:Contributions/JEA13|'''<span style="color:orange;">αντέξει</span>''']] File:1229655910-Th_master.jpg|20px]] 15:22, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
::::I agree with Ghost Sangheili, Nick. Plus, nobody mentioned this vote in the whole discussion. It can't be considered the reason of the argument. - [[User:JEA13|'''<span style="color:orange;">Μητσάρας</span>''']] [[User talk:JEA13|'''<span style="color:orange;">κι όποιος</span>''']] [[Special:Contributions/JEA13|'''<span style="color:orange;">αντέξει</span>''']] File:1229655910-Th_master.jpg|20px]] 15:22, 13 January 2009 (UTC)


Line 164: Line 164:
:Yeah. In my opinion, the ''too many admins'' reasons should be discounted. And anyways, there's no such thing as ''too many admins''. [[User:Nicmavr|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:orange">Nic</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Nicmavr|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:gold">ma</span>]]<sub></sub>[[User talk:Nicmavr|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:silver">vr</span>]]  File:Energy sword.jpg|17px]] 14:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
:Yeah. In my opinion, the ''too many admins'' reasons should be discounted. And anyways, there's no such thing as ''too many admins''. [[User:Nicmavr|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:orange">Nic</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Nicmavr|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:gold">ma</span>]]<sub></sub>[[User talk:Nicmavr|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:silver">vr</span>]]  File:Energy sword.jpg|17px]] 14:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


::Stop attacking people's arguments. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. There are plenty of valid arguments against DA. If you want to go on a vendetta against people's arguments, then say so and start a new section. Ghost sangheili
::Stop attacking people's arguments. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. There are plenty of valid arguments against DA. If you want to go on a vendetta against people's arguments, then say so and start a new section. {{Signature/Ghost sangheili}}


:::I am '''not''' attacking peoples arguments! While some are valid, ''to many admins'' one is not. What excuse is that? [[User:Nicmavr|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:orange">Nic</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Nicmavr|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:gold">ma</span>]]<sub></sub>[[User talk:Nicmavr|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:silver">vr</span>]]  File:Energy sword.jpg|17px]] 13:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
:::I am '''not''' attacking peoples arguments! While some are valid, ''to many admins'' one is not. What excuse is that? [[User:Nicmavr|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:orange">Nic</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Nicmavr|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:gold">ma</span>]]<sub></sub>[[User talk:Nicmavr|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:silver">vr</span>]]  File:Energy sword.jpg|17px]] 13:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Please note that all contributions to Halopedia are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see Halopedia:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

To view or search uploaded images go to the list of images. Uploads and deletions are also logged in the upload log. For help including images on a page see Help:Images. For a sound file, use this code: [[Media:File.ogg]].

Do not copy text from other websites without permission. It will be deleted.

Template used on this page: