Editing Halo: Reach

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 787: Line 787:
''Halo: Reach'' was released to critical and commercial success. 1Up praised the campaign, calling it "''a grand re-telling of the Battle of Thermopylae, but portrayed from a gritty, ground-level perspective across multiple missions like Band of Brothers, and all done with typical Halo flourish.''<ref>[http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3181331 '''1Up''': ''Halo: Reach Review'']</ref> IGN noted that though the past games had repetitive landscapes and complicated plots, ''Reach'' was an altogether different matter.<ref>[http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/111/1117228p1.html '''IGN''': ''Halo: Reach Review'']</ref> Gamepro stated "''the only thing missing from this impressive entry is a number “4” in the title, because for all intents and purposes, Reach feels like the next big thing in the Halo franchise''".<ref>[http://review.techworld.com/games/3239674/halo-reach-review/?view=verdict&intcmp=rv-ia-tb-4 '''Gamepro''': ''Halo: Reach review'']</ref>
''Halo: Reach'' was released to critical and commercial success. 1Up praised the campaign, calling it "''a grand re-telling of the Battle of Thermopylae, but portrayed from a gritty, ground-level perspective across multiple missions like Band of Brothers, and all done with typical Halo flourish.''<ref>[http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3181331 '''1Up''': ''Halo: Reach Review'']</ref> IGN noted that though the past games had repetitive landscapes and complicated plots, ''Reach'' was an altogether different matter.<ref>[http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/111/1117228p1.html '''IGN''': ''Halo: Reach Review'']</ref> Gamepro stated "''the only thing missing from this impressive entry is a number “4” in the title, because for all intents and purposes, Reach feels like the next big thing in the Halo franchise''".<ref>[http://review.techworld.com/games/3239674/halo-reach-review/?view=verdict&intcmp=rv-ia-tb-4 '''Gamepro''': ''Halo: Reach review'']</ref>


Many reviewers praised the enhanced graphics and audio, calling them "top-notch". Some reviewers noted that large amounts of action on-screen occasionally resulted in frame rate slowdowns and that the friendly non-player character artificial intelligence was less advanced than that of enemies, especially while driving.
Many reviewers praised the enhanced graphics and audio, calling it "top-notch".  


However, the game was criticized by certain members of the online ''Halo'' community, namely that it conflicts with the previously established canon in the novel ''Halo: The Fall of Reach''. These members argued that since the game has too many inconsistencies with the novel, it should not be considered canon. Even though Bungie had already stated that "the game's events supersede anything else",<ref>[http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/2010/09/14/bungie-on-the-contradictions-between-halo-reach-and-halo-the-fall-of-reach-novel/ '''MTV Multiplayer''': ''Bungie On The Contradictions Between 'Halo: Reach' And 'Halo: The Fall Of Reach' Novel'']</ref> a website, named "Halo: Reach is not canon.net", dedicated to such criticism was launched, and the site became a source for debating across the internet.<ref>[http://haloreach.isNot canon.net '''HRINC''': ''Halo Reach Is Not Canon'']</ref> However, most of the inconsistencies are later explained in the ''[[Halo: The Essential Visual Guide]]'', Dr. Halsey's personal journal included in the game's limited edition, the 2011 edition of the ''[[Halo Encyclopedia (2009 edition)]]'', and the [[Data Drop]]s released on Halo Waypoint.
However, the game was criticized by certain members of the online ''Halo'' community, namely that it conflicts with the previously established canon in the novel ''Halo: The Fall of Reach''. These members argued that since the game has too many inconsistencies with the novel, it should not be considered canon. Even though Bungie had already stated that "the game's events supersede anything else",<ref>[http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/2010/09/14/bungie-on-the-contradictions-between-halo-reach-and-halo-the-fall-of-reach-novel/ '''MTV Multiplayer''': ''Bungie On The Contradictions Between 'Halo: Reach' And 'Halo: The Fall Of Reach' Novel'']</ref> a website, named "Halo: Reach is not canon.net", dedicated to such criticism was launched, and the site became a source for debating across the internet.<ref>[http://haloreach.isNot canon.net '''HRINC''': ''Halo Reach Is Not Canon'']</ref> However, most of the inconsistencies are later explained in the ''[[Halo: The Essential Visual Guide]]'', Dr. Halsey's personal journal included in the game's limited edition, the 2011 edition of the ''[[Halo Encyclopedia (2009 edition)]]'', and the [[Data Drop]]s released on Halo Waypoint.

Please note that all contributions to Halopedia are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see Halopedia:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

To view or search uploaded images go to the list of images. Uploads and deletions are also logged in the upload log. For help including images on a page see Help:Images. For a sound file, use this code: [[Media:File.ogg]].

Do not copy text from other websites without permission. It will be deleted.

Templates used on this page:

This page is a member of 2 meta categories: