5,323
edits
Talk:Insurrectionist: Difference between revisions
m
→Support: removed: 28px
| (7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archived}}<!-- Do not remove --> | {{Archived}}<!-- Do not remove --> | ||
==Untitled== | |||
Who are the other two leaders? One of them is [[Colonel Watts]] right? | Who are the other two leaders? One of them is [[Colonel Watts]] right? | ||
:It isn't stated, so it's up to speculation at this point. --[[User:Dragonclaws|Dragonclaws]] 18:43, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | :It isn't stated, so it's up to speculation at this point. --[[User:Dragonclaws|Dragonclaws]] 18:43, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
== Still around? == | == Still around? == | ||
Got a question, is the URF still around during Halo 3? --[[User:UNSC Trooper|<font color="darkblue">UNSC Trooper</font>]] | Got a question, is the URF still around during Halo 3? --[[User:UNSC Trooper|<font color="darkblue">UNSC Trooper</font>]] File:unsctrooper_small.jpg|14px]] <sup>[[User talk:UNSC Trooper|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/UNSC Trooper|<font color="green">My Work</font>]]</sub> 19:22, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I'm pretty sure that the URF has been soundly defeated. In Halo: First Strike, there is a part that says "...symbols of a rebellion the UNSC no longer had to worry about". How come that isn't mentioned in any of the articles? [[User:Don113|Don113]] 01:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC) | :I'm pretty sure that the URF has been soundly defeated. In Halo: First Strike, there is a part that says "...symbols of a rebellion the UNSC no longer had to worry about". How come that isn't mentioned in any of the articles? [[User:Don113|Don113]] 01:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Nothing conclusive has been said of that faction's fate. --<b>[[User:ED|<font color="black">E</font>]][[User talk:ED|<font color="black">D</font>]] | ::Nothing conclusive has been said of that faction's fate. --<b>[[User:ED|<font color="black">E</font>]][[User talk:ED|<font color="black">D</font>]]File:ArmyROTC.gif|15px]]</b> 05:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Halsey narrates it as they walk past rebel flags. However, this may just be a general reference to the Covenant threat. Note that this is before they meet up with the rebels in the asteroid field, so this could just be foreshadowing. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#4D56B1">Dragon<font color="#F28500">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#4D56B1">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 00:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | :::Halsey narrates it as they walk past rebel flags. However, this may just be a general reference to the Covenant threat. Note that this is before they meet up with the rebels in the asteroid field, so this could just be foreshadowing. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#4D56B1">Dragon<font color="#F28500">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#4D56B1">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 00:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 59: | Line 61: | ||
===Support=== | ===Support=== | ||
*{{Support}} - As per the near-unanimous consensus above. Vegerot goes RAWR! | *{{Support}} - As per the near-unanimous consensus above. Vegerot goes RAWR! [[User:Vegerot|<span style="color:midnightblue; font-weight:bold">Vegerot</span>]] ([[User talk:Vegerot|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]]) 11:31, 18 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
*{{Support}} - --[[User talk:The All-knowing Sith'ari|The All-knowing Sith'ari]] 12:16, 18 September 2011 (EDT) | *{{Support}} - --[[User talk:The All-knowing Sith'ari|The All-knowing Sith'ari]] 12:16, 18 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
*{{Support}} - If the above discoveries are accurate. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 12:58, 18 September 2011 (EDT) | *{{Support}} - If the above discoveries are accurate. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 12:58, 18 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
*{{Support}} - Dragonclaws says yea. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#800080">Dragon<font color="#DE397E">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#6600D8">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 14:26, 18 September 2011 (EDT) | *{{Support}} - Dragonclaws says yea. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#800080">Dragon<font color="#DE397E">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#6600D8">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 14:26, 18 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
*{{Support}} - Yesh. - | *{{Support}} - Yesh. - [[User:Halo-343|<span style="color: purple; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 128%;">'''Halo-343'''</span>]] [[User talk:Halo-343|<font color="green">('''Talk''')</font>]] 07:50, 24 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
| Line 79: | Line 81: | ||
On another note: Congratulations on your newly acquired admin rights, guys. You'll make this community proud. --[[User talk:Braidenvl|Courage never dies.]] 00:25, 3 September 2012 (EDT) | On another note: Congratulations on your newly acquired admin rights, guys. You'll make this community proud. --[[User talk:Braidenvl|Courage never dies.]] 00:25, 3 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
:Can we assume that this "united rebel front" is a non-Insurrectionist term for a group of interconnected secessionists? A UNSC propaganda name, perhaps? I should re-read my copy of ''Ghosts of Onyx'' for the context, though. I remember during the last debate it was argued that it could not be a real name because a secessionist group wouldn't make themselves seem so militant (and, therefore, less appealing to the public).-- '''[[User:Forerunner|<font color="blue">Fore</font>]]''[[User talk:Forerunner|<font color="green">run</font>]]''[[Special:Contributions/Forerunner|<font color="red">ner</font>]]''''' 02:12, 3 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
::That is a possibility. ''Ghosts of Onyx'' didn't treat it as a proper name, but one could assume that the UNSC may use the term "United Rebel Front" in reference to the widely organized portion of the Insurrectionists, similar to how one might capitalize "the Resistance". In that case restoring the whole URF article wouldn't be necessary; we could just mention the usage of the "United Rebel Front" moniker in the introductory section of this article. The question is one of interpretation, really. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 11:08, 24 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
:Well, it's not the first time insurrectionist have used a "unified" name, such as with the Secessionist Union or the Freedom and Liberation Party. Note also that many say "viva la Resistance" or "viva la Revolucion", thus equating themselves with a rebellious name. With names like those, the name "United Rebel Front" sounds like something entirely plausible for them to choose. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 11:59, 24 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
So, we reached a consensus on this a while back. Anyone know where the URF's information was previously at so we can restore it? [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 03:41, 2 November 2012 (EDT) | |||
:Found where it was. About to restore the article. Would it be appropriate to note how it was originally mentioned in canon and how it's being mentioned in more recent canon?--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 12:07, 21 January 2013 (EST) | |||