Forum:Halo 5: Guardians (General): Difference between revisions
→Confirmed Weapons for Multiplayer Beta
| Line 499: | Line 499: | ||
:::You're right, I think that ''is'' the magazine on top; it's even more like a P90 now, a true MP7/P90 hybrid. Even the [[http://www.halopedia.org/images/9/95/Halo5_SMG.png details of the magazine] look very similar to the [http://www.imfdb.org/images/5/53/FNP90.jpg P90's], including the magazine release at the rear, and the SMG's front rail mount is very similar to the [http://www.imfdb.org/images/d/de/FN_P90_Triple_Rail_%28TR%29.jpg P90 TR's] as well. I bet that rail mount is an arch as opposed to being solid, so you could use the iron sights, as the front sight is under it. Redesigning it to have a top-mounted magazine with a charging handle on each side makes the gun completely ambidextrous, and given that the stock is collapsed in this picture, we may actually see dual-wielding. It's nice to see a weapon redesign that's actually something worth changing in-universe. Hmm, it's probably still an M7, even with this much of a change. I mean, not only is Halo 2's M6C somehow still an M6 when functionally it's a completely different design, but apparently it's even the same variant as the M6C SOCOM, which makes even less sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] ([[User talk:Alex T Snow|talk]]) 18:18, 20 August 2014 (EDT) | :::You're right, I think that ''is'' the magazine on top; it's even more like a P90 now, a true MP7/P90 hybrid. Even the [[http://www.halopedia.org/images/9/95/Halo5_SMG.png details of the magazine] look very similar to the [http://www.imfdb.org/images/5/53/FNP90.jpg P90's], including the magazine release at the rear, and the SMG's front rail mount is very similar to the [http://www.imfdb.org/images/d/de/FN_P90_Triple_Rail_%28TR%29.jpg P90 TR's] as well. I bet that rail mount is an arch as opposed to being solid, so you could use the iron sights, as the front sight is under it. Redesigning it to have a top-mounted magazine with a charging handle on each side makes the gun completely ambidextrous, and given that the stock is collapsed in this picture, we may actually see dual-wielding. It's nice to see a weapon redesign that's actually something worth changing in-universe. Hmm, it's probably still an M7, even with this much of a change. I mean, not only is Halo 2's M6C somehow still an M6 when functionally it's a completely different design, but apparently it's even the same variant as the M6C SOCOM, which makes even less sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] ([[User talk:Alex T Snow|talk]]) 18:18, 20 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
I guess I just automatically went with an SAW Type weapon. I guess it could be a Multi-Shot Railgun, or even Lock-On Micro Missle-firing weapon. I guess the magazine in top just confused me a lot. Its just so weird. Cheers, [[Special:Contributions/76.17.73.143|76.17.73.143]] 20:36, 22 August 2014 (EDT) | |||
==Fred-104 confirmed== | ==Fred-104 confirmed== | ||