Page history
November 19, 2010
October 30, 2010
September 30, 2010
This is NOT a direct allusion. If it was, it would have been mentioned as such. It never was.
−187
→Aftermath
m+1
Undo revision 1099850 by Oddsock (talk) It's not coincedental because it is a direct and intentional allusion. Keep it.
+187
September 29, 2010
Stop adding this, it's not coincidental enough.
−187
Undo revision 1099410 by Oddsock (talk)
+191
It is NOT relevant! The good guys are in the place of the bad guys and it's the few attacking the many! It hardly resembles the BoT.
−191
September 28, 2010
September 26, 2010
September 15, 2010
September 14, 2010
September 1, 2010
August 29, 2010
August 28, 2010
August 23, 2010
August 22, 2010
August 8, 2010
August 1, 2010
Reverted edits by 68.205.234.161 (Talk) to last version by General5 7
m−77
→July 3, 2545
+7
→History
+70
July 31, 2010
June 17, 2010
May 13, 2010
April 14, 2010
April 10, 2010
April 5, 2010
April 4, 2010
March 23, 2010
March 15, 2010
March 12, 2010
Undo revision 985196 by 97.119.160.173 (talk) He was not in Operation: TORPEDO, read the trivia or Noble six's article...
m−14
→Introduction
+14